-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add sort and remove duplication to statistical_inefficiency #119
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #119 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.34% 97.39% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 16 16
Lines 942 961 +19
Branches 206 211 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 917 936 +19
Misses 5 5
Partials 20 20
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this looks sensible to me. Maybe @dotsdl wants to have a quick look.
I mainly have comments on the tests.
Also add an entry to CHANGELOG, please.
@orbeckst Thank you for the review. I have updated the PR. |
@xiki-tempula , this looks good to me. But do you know why the coverage is so low? I see that two |
@orbeckst Thank you for the review. The two if checks if the |
Then these should be simple tests: just as before, just don't give the series. It seems a bit over the top but could you please add tests for this case, too? Then this PR will be done. |
@orbeckst Thanks for the suggestions, I have bumped the test. |
Fix #118