Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed redundant lines for calculating statistical inefficiency #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2020
Merged

Removed redundant lines for calculating statistical inefficiency #97

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2020

Conversation

wehs7661
Copy link
Contributor

Removed redundant lines for calculating statistical inefficiency.
For more information, please see Issue #96. Thank you.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #97 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #97      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.27%   97.26%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         696      695       -1     
  Branches      141      141              
==========================================
- Hits          677      676       -1     
  Misses          5        5              
  Partials       14       14
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/alchemlyb/preprocessing/subsampling.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed6cb72...bcaeaa9. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@dotsdl dotsdl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be good! Thank you for spotting this @wehs7661!

@dotsdl dotsdl merged commit 7fcdf7a into alchemistry:master Jan 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants