-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mention other platforms in 'pytest/pytest-cov not found' warning #337
Mention other platforms in 'pytest/pytest-cov not found' warning #337
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
"The Python module 'pytest' was not found, pytests cannot be run. " | ||
"On Ubuntu/Debian, install the 'python3-pytest' package. " | ||
"On other platforms, install 'pytest' using pip.") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it makes more sense to just point to the generic installation docs instead. That is, something like:
"The Python module 'pytest' was not found, pytests cannot be run. "
"See https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/Installation.html to install pytest for your platform.")
This has the downside that we are embedding a rolling URL in the code, but it avoids duplicating the install instructions. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would make sense for pytest
because it is part of a normal ROS 2 installation (however, pytest-cov
isn't), but besides embedding rolling
in the URL, I kind of prefer the current warning messages because they tell you exactly what you need to do (install ___ package) instead of pointing you to the generic installation docs just to install a Python package or two.
In any case, I can switch to that for pytest
if you prefer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another thing: should ament
really link to ROS 2 like that? As opposed to the other way around, ROS 2 linking to ament
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kind of prefer the current warning messages because they tell you exactly what you need to do (install ___ package) instead of pointing you to the generic installation docs just to install a Python package or two.
Yeah, that's true.
another thing: should
ament
really link to ROS 2 like that? As opposed to the other way around, ROS 2 linking toament
.
In theory, no. In practice, it seems unlikely that anyone outside the ROS 2 ecosystem is using ament (at least, I don't know of any). It would be nice to be proven wrong, though :).
Overall, I agree with you about keeping the current message. The one thing I would say is let's change the message to say "On Linux, install the 'python3-pytest' package", since that will also cover RHEL/Fedora.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In theory, no. In practice, it seems unlikely that anyone outside the ROS 2 ecosystem is using ament (at least, I don't know of any). It would be nice to be proven wrong, though :).
maybe one day! 😄
Overall, I agree with you about keeping the current message. The one thing I would say is let's change the message to say "On Linux, install the 'python3-pytest' package", since that will also cover RHEL/Fedora.
done: 0752f31
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Looks good, going ahead and merging. Thanks for the contribution! |
Relates to #274
Signed-off-by: Christophe Bedard [email protected]