You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi - would it be possible to add an option to the duplicate marking function to only mark optical duplicates? Most PCR-free applications, including most WGS workflows, would benefit from this. Note that ideally there would also be a means to control the distance - other tools e.g. Picard typically use 100 for unpatterned flow cells and 2500 for patterned flow cells by default (although in the latter case this may be too low and marking by tile may be better).
Related: UMI-aware duplicate marking would also be appreciated, although I realize that this might be more complicated to implement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For PCR-free libraries, similar to Novosort, ideally there would be both an --opticalOnly option with a distance threshold for true optical duplicates on unpatterned flow cells, as well as a --pcrFree option to mark ExAmp duplicates on patterned flow cells, which would mark duplicates within the same flow cell lane or tile, since ExAmp duplicates travel much farther than optical duplicates.
Hi - would it be possible to add an option to the duplicate marking function to only mark optical duplicates? Most PCR-free applications, including most WGS workflows, would benefit from this. Note that ideally there would also be a means to control the distance - other tools e.g. Picard typically use 100 for unpatterned flow cells and 2500 for patterned flow cells by default (although in the latter case this may be too low and marking by tile may be better).
Related: UMI-aware duplicate marking would also be appreciated, although I realize that this might be more complicated to implement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: