Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port dialogs/popups to AdwDialog counterparts #628

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

sungsphinx
Copy link
Contributor

This replaces #623, hopefully the log is cleaner, as well as the weird git rebase -i shenanigans being gone :D.

@andyholmes
Copy link
Owner

commitlint needs to be fixed, just needs to be lower-case, e.g. feat: port dialogs/popups.... abidiff will fail because of the symbol changes, that's fine.

Basically just the Flatpak (Unstable) needs to pass right now, then I'll figure out what to do. It might be time to start branching when the run-time branches 🤔

@sungsphinx sungsphinx force-pushed the adw-dialog-2nd-attempt branch 3 times, most recently from 97e481a to 73f2566 Compare March 4, 2024 15:43
@sungsphinx sungsphinx changed the title feat: Port dialogs/popups to AdwDialog counterparts Port dialogs/popups to AdwDialog counterparts Mar 4, 2024
@sungsphinx
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I know why the "stable" Flatpak CI is failing, but the unstable CI I am not quite sure about, maybe you could have a look? https://github.com/andyholmes/valent/actions/runs/8142976430/job/22274123454?pr=628#step:4:5624

Copy link
Owner

@andyholmes andyholmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would first look at those uncleared AdwDialog pointers, and if that doesn't fix it, have a look in test-window.c where test_window_dialogs is failing.

I have a suspicion it's failing on the about dialog, since all the previous tests pass. You can just comment stuff out until it passes to get that.

Oh, and the stable is failing because flatter doesn't have a beta/rc image.

You can open an MR for one if you like, but it's not necessary to if you just want to wait.

src/libvalent/ui/valent-device-page.c Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libvalent/ui/valent-preferences-dialog.ui Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libvalent/ui/valent-window.c Show resolved Hide resolved
sungsphinx added a commit to sungsphinx/valent that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
@sungsphinx
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andyholmes Flatpak Unstable CI finally passed 🎉, is there any other changes you would like made?

@andyholmes
Copy link
Owner

@andyholmes Flatpak Unstable CI finally passed 🎉, is there any other changes you would like made?

Nope, this looks great! I will figure out branching scheme, because I don't like waiting either :) Might take a few days though, thanks for sticking with this!

Copy link
Owner

@andyholmes andyholmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, we are good to go :)

If you want to bump those two dependencies, we can merge ASAP 🚀

build-aux/flatpak/ca.andyholmes.Valent.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
meson.build Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
andyholmes pushed a commit to sungsphinx/valent that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
@andyholmes andyholmes force-pushed the adw-dialog-2nd-attempt branch from 699a693 to 06e680d Compare March 21, 2024 06:52
@andyholmes andyholmes marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2024 06:52
sungsphinx and others added 6 commits March 21, 2024 00:00
@andyholmes andyholmes force-pushed the adw-dialog-2nd-attempt branch from 06e680d to d395a84 Compare March 21, 2024 07:00
@andyholmes andyholmes merged commit 199b608 into andyholmes:main Mar 21, 2024
16 of 20 checks passed
andyholmes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
@andyholmes
Copy link
Owner

Here we gooo!

@sungsphinx sungsphinx deleted the adw-dialog-2nd-attempt branch April 10, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants