Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update stringio again... #139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024
Merged

Update stringio again... #139

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

o7n
Copy link
Contributor

@o7n o7n commented Jun 25, 2024

Ok so 5 minutes after my previous PR another update to stringio was released to core tests-passed 😱

@angusmcleod
Copy link
Owner

I wonder why we're specifying this independently...

@angusmcleod
Copy link
Owner

More of a question to myself than you.

@angusmcleod
Copy link
Owner

@o7n Handled in dd64214

@o7n
Copy link
Contributor Author

o7n commented Jun 25, 2024

More of a question to myself than you.

But I do have the answer, actually it was in the previous PR because I asked myself the same this morning

Stringio is now part of Rails 7.1 but on stable it's still necessary to explicitly include the stringio gem so it cannot be removed yet until we arrive at 3.3 stable

@angusmcleod
Copy link
Owner

Oh! Do we need to do anything more here then?

@o7n
Copy link
Contributor Author

o7n commented Jun 25, 2024

I think you need to revert your commit dd64214 since stable won't have the stringio gem now and that would be a problem.

I'm not sure what code depends on it so it's hard to test and know for sure.

@angusmcleod
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, you're right. I've reverted that commit and merging this.

@angusmcleod angusmcleod reopened this Jun 25, 2024
@angusmcleod angusmcleod merged commit 9249032 into main Jun 25, 2024
4 of 8 checks passed
@angusmcleod angusmcleod deleted the update-stringio-311 branch June 25, 2024 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants