Addition of PR Template to Improve Contribution Process #15
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closing #10
Description:
This pull request introduces a new PR template for the project. The primary goal of this template is to streamline the evaluation process of pull requests submitted by contributors.
Key improvements with this PR template include:
Structure: The template provides a structured format for contributors to detail their changes and the rationale behind them. This standardization not only helps the contributors in framing their contributions but also assists reviewers in understanding the context of the changes.
Traceability: The template prompts contributors to link their PRs to the issues they resolve or the features they add. This traceability is crucial for project management and tracking progress.
Clarity for Reviewers: The template sections guide contributors to provide all necessary information, making it easier for reviewers to understand what has changed, where, and why.
This PR template is expected to significantly enhance the efficiency of the review process and the overall contribution workflow. It will ensure that all necessary details are provided upfront, reducing the need for extensive back-and-forths during reviews.