-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve regexp kernels performance by avoiding cloning Regex #5235
Conversation
arrow-string/src/regexp.rs
Outdated
None => { | ||
let re = Regex::new(pattern.as_str()).map_err(|e| { | ||
ArrowError::ComputeError(format!( | ||
"Regular expression did not compile: {e:?}" | ||
)) | ||
})?; | ||
patterns.insert(pattern, re.clone()); | ||
re | ||
patterns.insert(pattern.clone(), re); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps you could use https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/hash_map/enum.Entry.html#method.or_insert
let existing_pattern = patterns.get(&pattern); | ||
let re = match existing_pattern { | ||
Some(re) => re.clone(), | ||
Some(re) => re, | ||
None => { | ||
let re = Regex::new(pattern.as_str()).map_err(|e| { | ||
ArrowError::ComputeError(format!( | ||
"Regular expression did not compile: {e:?}" | ||
)) | ||
})?; | ||
patterns.insert(pattern, re.clone()); | ||
re | ||
patterns.entry(pattern).or_insert(re) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you replaced the get
above with this entry call, it might improve the performance further by eliminating a branch perhaps??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, then we need to use or_insert_with
like
let re = patterns.entry(pattern).or_insert_with(|| {
Regex::new(pattern.as_str()).map_err(|e| {
ArrowError::ComputeError(format!(
"Regular expression did not compile: {e:?}"
))
}?)
});
But or_insert_with
cannot propagate the error out of the function.
Tried with Result<Regex, ArrowError>
as value type with the patterns
HashMap, but then it doesn't work because the ? operator cannot be applied to type &mut Result<regex::Regex, arrow_schema::ArrowError>
too.
So just keep it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Entry is an enumeration you can match on, you don't have to use or_insert_with and friends, they're just utilities like on Option
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, the branch to eliminate is the one inside or_insert
? Do you mean something like:
let entry = patterns.entry(pattern.clone());
let re = match entry {
Entry::Occupied(entry) => entry.into_mut(),
Entry::Vacant(entry) => {
let re = Regex::new(pattern.as_str()).map_err(|e| {
ArrowError::ComputeError(format!(
"Regular expression did not compile: {e:?}"
))
})?;
entry.insert(re)
}
};
Hmm, it actually gets regression a little. 🤔
regexp time: [7.6891 ms 7.7210 ms 7.7511 ms]
change: [+14.792% +15.570% +16.321%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has regressed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is what I meant, perhaps the regression is because of the added clone (which i think can be removed)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clone
? You mean let entry = patterns.entry(pattern.clone());
? It cannot be removed.
216 | (Some(value), Some(pattern)) => {
| ------- move occurs because `pattern` has type `String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
217 | let entry = patterns.entry(pattern);
| ------- value moved here
...
221 | let re = Regex::new(pattern.as_str()).map_err(|e| {
| ^^^^^^^ value borrowed here after move
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
217 | let entry = patterns.entry(pattern.clone());
| ++++++++
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh because of the unfortunate way flags are handled... Yeah this kernel would probably do with redesigning 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As an aside it occurs to me we should probably have a version of this that takes Datum
Yea, I did a local version and tested it with DataFusion. It turns out the performance bottleneck is on cloning Regex mostly. But it is per query benchmark and I didn't run this kernel benchmark in it. I will run this benchmark against the Datum version and probably submit it later. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I double checked that all the clone()
s in arrow-string/src/regexp.rs
are removed 👍
Thanks @viirya this is amazing
Thank you @viirya ! |
Thank you @alamb @Dandandan @tustvold for review |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
The
regexp_match
scalar expression in DataFusion is quite slow. As looking for the cause, it is found that the bad performance is due to cloningRegex
per row.Regex
has aCachePool
. CloningRegex
will create a freshCachePool
and it is somehow expensive to re-creating cache space per row instead of reusing the cache.What changes are included in this PR?
This patch removes cloning on
Regex
in regexp kernels.Are there any user-facing changes?