Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support custom struct field names with new scalar function named_struct #9743

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions datafusion/functions/src/core/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
mod arrow_cast;
mod arrowtypeof;
mod getfield;
mod named_struct;
mod nullif;
mod nvl;
mod nvl2;
Expand All @@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ make_udf_function!(nvl::NVLFunc, NVL, nvl);
make_udf_function!(nvl2::NVL2Func, NVL2, nvl2);
make_udf_function!(arrowtypeof::ArrowTypeOfFunc, ARROWTYPEOF, arrow_typeof);
make_udf_function!(r#struct::StructFunc, STRUCT, r#struct);
make_udf_function!(named_struct::NamedStructFunc, NAMED_STRUCT, named_struct);
make_udf_function!(getfield::GetFieldFunc, GET_FIELD, get_field);

// Export the functions out of this package, both as expr_fn as well as a list of functions
Expand All @@ -42,5 +44,6 @@ export_functions!(
(nvl2, arg_1 arg_2 arg_3, "Returns value2 if value1 is not NULL; otherwise, it returns value3."),
(arrow_typeof, arg_1, "Returns the Arrow type of the input expression."),
(r#struct, args, "Returns a struct with the given arguments"),
(named_struct, args, "Returns a struct with the given names and arguments pairs"),
(get_field, arg_1 arg_2, "Returns the value of the field with the given name from the struct")
);
148 changes: 148 additions & 0 deletions datafusion/functions/src/core/named_struct.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
// distributed with this work for additional information
// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
// specific language governing permissions and limitations
// under the License.

use arrow::array::StructArray;
use arrow::datatypes::{DataType, Field, Fields};
use datafusion_common::{exec_err, internal_err, Result, ScalarValue};
use datafusion_expr::{ColumnarValue, Expr, ExprSchemable};
use datafusion_expr::{ScalarUDFImpl, Signature, Volatility};
use std::any::Any;
use std::sync::Arc;

/// put values in a struct array.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than adding a new function, I think we could instead change the existing struct UDF to support explicit named fields.

Perhaps we can do that as a follow on PR?

fn named_struct_expr(args: &[ColumnarValue]) -> Result<ColumnarValue> {
// do not accept 0 arguments.
if args.is_empty() {
return exec_err!(
"named_struct requires at least one pair of arguments, got 0 instead"
);
}

if args.len() % 2 != 0 {
return exec_err!(
"named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got {} instead",
args.len()
);
}

let (names, values): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = args
.chunks_exact(2)
.enumerate()
.map(|(i, chunk)| {

let name_column = &chunk[0];

let name = match name_column {
ColumnarValue::Scalar(ScalarValue::Utf8(Some(name_scalar))) => name_scalar,
_ => return exec_err!("named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got {name_column:?} instead at position {}", i * 2)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

};

Ok((name, chunk[1].clone()))
})
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?
.into_iter()
.unzip();

let arrays = ColumnarValue::values_to_arrays(&values)?;

let fields = names
.into_iter()
.zip(arrays)
.map(|(name, value)| {
(
Arc::new(Field::new(name, value.data_type().clone(), true)),
value,
)
})
.collect::<Vec<_>>();

Ok(ColumnarValue::Array(Arc::new(StructArray::from(fields))))
}

#[derive(Debug)]
pub(super) struct NamedStructFunc {
signature: Signature,
}

impl NamedStructFunc {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
signature: Signature::variadic_any(Volatility::Immutable),
}
}
}

impl ScalarUDFImpl for NamedStructFunc {
fn as_any(&self) -> &dyn Any {
self
}

fn name(&self) -> &str {
"named_struct"
}

fn signature(&self) -> &Signature {
&self.signature
}

fn return_type(&self, _arg_types: &[DataType]) -> Result<DataType> {
internal_err!(
"named_struct: return_type called instead of return_type_from_exprs"
)
}

fn return_type_from_exprs(
&self,
args: &[datafusion_expr::Expr],
schema: &dyn datafusion_common::ExprSchema,
_arg_types: &[DataType],
) -> Result<DataType> {
// do not accept 0 arguments.
if args.is_empty() {
return exec_err!(
"named_struct requires at least one pair of arguments, got 0 instead"
);
}

if args.len() % 2 != 0 {
return exec_err!(
"named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got {} instead",
args.len()
);
}

let return_fields = args
.chunks_exact(2)
.enumerate()
.map(|(i, chunk)| {
let name = &chunk[0];
let value = &chunk[1];

if let Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::Utf8(Some(name))) = name {
Ok(Field::new(name, value.get_type(schema)?, true))
} else {
exec_err!("named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got {name} instead at position {}", i * 2)
}
})
.collect::<Result<Vec<Field>>>()?;
Ok(DataType::Struct(Fields::from(return_fields)))
}

fn invoke(&self, args: &[ColumnarValue]) -> Result<ColumnarValue> {
named_struct_expr(args)
}
}
45 changes: 36 additions & 9 deletions datafusion/sql/src/expr/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ use datafusion_expr::expr::InList;
use datafusion_expr::expr::ScalarFunction;
use datafusion_expr::{
col, expr, lit, AggregateFunction, Between, BinaryExpr, BuiltinScalarFunction, Cast,
Expr, ExprSchemable, GetFieldAccess, GetIndexedField, Like, Operator, TryCast,
Expr, ExprSchemable, GetFieldAccess, GetIndexedField, Like, Literal, Operator,
TryCast,
};

use crate::planner::{ContextProvider, PlannerContext, SqlToRel};
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -604,18 +605,44 @@ impl<'a, S: ContextProvider> SqlToRel<'a, S> {
}
let args = values
.into_iter()
.map(|value| {
self.sql_expr_to_logical_expr(value, input_schema, planner_context)
.enumerate()
.map(|(i, value)| {
let args = if let SQLExpr::Named { expr, name } = value {
[
name.value.lit(),
self.sql_expr_to_logical_expr(
*expr,
input_schema,
planner_context,
)?,
]
} else {
[
format!("c{i}").lit(),
self.sql_expr_to_logical_expr(
value,
input_schema,
planner_context,
)?,
]
};

Ok(args)
})
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
let struct_func = self
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?
.into_iter()
.flatten()
.collect();

let named_struct_func = self
.context_provider
.get_function_meta("struct")
.get_function_meta("named_struct")
.ok_or_else(|| {
internal_datafusion_err!("Unable to find expected 'struct' function")
})?;
internal_datafusion_err!("Unable to find expected 'named_struct' function")
})?;

Ok(Expr::ScalarFunction(ScalarFunction::new_udf(
struct_func,
named_struct_func,
args,
)))
}
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/explain.slt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -390,8 +390,8 @@ query TT
explain select struct(1, 2.3, 'abc');
----
logical_plan
Projection: Struct({c0:1,c1:2.3,c2:abc}) AS struct(Int64(1),Float64(2.3),Utf8("abc"))
Projection: Struct({c0:1,c1:2.3,c2:abc}) AS named_struct(Utf8("c0"),Int64(1),Utf8("c1"),Float64(2.3),Utf8("c2"),Utf8("abc"))
--EmptyRelation
physical_plan
ProjectionExec: expr=[{c0:1,c1:2.3,c2:abc} as struct(Int64(1),Float64(2.3),Utf8("abc"))]
ProjectionExec: expr=[{c0:1,c1:2.3,c2:abc} as named_struct(Utf8("c0"),Int64(1),Utf8("c1"),Float64(2.3),Utf8("c2"),Utf8("abc"))]
--PlaceholderRowExec
112 changes: 106 additions & 6 deletions datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/struct.slt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,11 +23,12 @@ statement ok
CREATE TABLE values(
a INT,
b FLOAT,
c VARCHAR
c VARCHAR,
n VARCHAR,
) AS VALUES
(1, 1.1, 'a'),
(2, 2.2, 'b'),
(3, 3.3, 'c')
(1, 1.1, 'a', NULL),
(2, 2.2, 'b', NULL),
(3, 3.3, 'c', NULL)
;

# struct[i]
Expand All @@ -50,6 +51,18 @@ select struct(1, 3.14, 'e');
----
{c0: 1, c1: 3.14, c2: e}

# struct scalar function with named values
query ?
select struct(1 as "name0", 3.14 as name1, 'e', true as 'name3');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is very cool -- I didn't realize we supported this syntax

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haha, i thought it's a generic syntax supported basically anywhere, only after your comment i realized it's specific to struct(...)

----
{name0: 1, name1: 3.14, c2: e, name3: true}

# struct scalar function with mixed named and unnamed values
query ?
select struct(1, 3.14 as name1, 'e', true);
----
{c0: 1, name1: 3.14, c2: e, c3: true}

# struct scalar function with columns #1
query ?
select struct(a, b, c) from values;
Expand All @@ -72,11 +85,98 @@ query TT
explain select struct(a, b, c) from values;
----
logical_plan
Projection: struct(values.a, values.b, values.c)
Projection: named_struct(Utf8("c0"), values.a, Utf8("c1"), values.b, Utf8("c2"), values.c)
--TableScan: values projection=[a, b, c]
physical_plan
ProjectionExec: expr=[struct(a@0, b@1, c@2) as struct(values.a,values.b,values.c)]
ProjectionExec: expr=[named_struct(c0, a@0, c1, b@1, c2, c@2) as named_struct(Utf8("c0"),values.a,Utf8("c1"),values.b,Utf8("c2"),values.c)]
Copy link
Contributor

@yyy1000 yyy1000 Mar 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I also have the same concern as @alamb said in #9743 (comment). It seems that from here, the current struct UDF will never be called because calling struct will rewrite into named_struct UDF 👀

We can also leave this and probably add it as a follow-up

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed #9839 for follow up

--MemoryExec: partitions=1, partition_sizes=[1]

# error on 0 arguments
query error DataFusion error: Error during planning: No function matches the given name and argument types 'named_struct\(\)'. You might need to add explicit type casts.
select named_struct();

# error on odd number of arguments #1
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead
select named_struct('a');

# error on odd number of arguments #2
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead
select named_struct(1);

# error on odd number of arguments #3
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 1 instead
select named_struct(values.a) from values;

# error on odd number of arguments #4
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct requires an even number of arguments, got 3 instead
select named_struct('a', 1, 'b');

# error on even argument not a string literal #1
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got Int64\(1\) instead at position 0
select named_struct(1, 'a');

# error on even argument not a string literal #2
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got Int64\(0\) instead at position 2
select named_struct('corret', 1, 0, 'wrong');

# error on even argument not a string literal #3
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got values\.a instead at position 0
select named_struct(values.a, 'a') from values;

# error on even argument not a string literal #4
query error DataFusion error: Execution error: named_struct even arguments must be string literals, got values\.c instead at position 0
select named_struct(values.c, 'c') from values;

# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #1
query ?
select named_struct('scalar', 27, 'array', values.a, 'null', NULL) from values;
----
{scalar: 27, array: 1, null: }
{scalar: 27, array: 2, null: }
{scalar: 27, array: 3, null: }

# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #2
query ?
select named_struct('array', values.a, 'scalar', 27, 'null', NULL) from values;
----
{array: 1, scalar: 27, null: }
{array: 2, scalar: 27, null: }
{array: 3, scalar: 27, null: }

# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #3
query ?
select named_struct('null', NULL, 'array', values.a, 'scalar', 27) from values;
----
{null: , array: 1, scalar: 27}
{null: , array: 2, scalar: 27}
{null: , array: 3, scalar: 27}

# named_struct with mixed scalar and array values #4
query ?
select named_struct('null_array', values.n, 'array', values.a, 'scalar', 27, 'null', NULL) from values;
----
{null_array: , array: 1, scalar: 27, null: }
{null_array: , array: 2, scalar: 27, null: }
{null_array: , array: 3, scalar: 27, null: }

# named_struct arrays only
query ?
select named_struct('field_a', a, 'field_b', b) from values;
----
{field_a: 1, field_b: 1.1}
{field_a: 2, field_b: 2.2}
{field_a: 3, field_b: 3.3}

# named_struct scalars only
query ?
select named_struct('field_a', 1, 'field_b', 2);
----
{field_a: 1, field_b: 2}

statement ok
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we please add a few more tests:

  1. Error case: named_struct with 0 arguments
  2. Error case: named_struct wth an odd number of arguments
  3. Error case: named_struct with an even number of arguments
  4. A test where the arguments are both columns and arrays (example below)

Here is an example (I expect it to panic in this PR at first -- see #9775 for how to fix it)

❯ create table t(x int) as values (1), (2), (3);
0 rows in set. Query took 0.014 seconds.

❯ select named_struct(x as 'col_x', 25 as scalar) from t;

Copy link
Contributor

@yyy1000 yyy1000 Mar 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, also a basic test case like the document you added.
select named_struct('field_a', a, 'field_b', b) from t;

Edit: or maybe you can add the test cases to a new test file?

drop table values;

query T
select arrow_typeof(named_struct('first', 1, 'second', 2, 'third', 3));
----
Struct([Field { name: "first", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }, Field { name: "second", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }, Field { name: "third", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }])
Loading
Loading