Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Chore](runtime-filter) refactor of runtime filter void type data usage #43957

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

refactor of runtime filter void type data usage

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

be/src/exprs/runtime_filter_convertor.h Show resolved Hide resolved
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

4 similar comments
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@@ -569,6 +553,14 @@ class StringSet : public HybridSetBase {

ContainerType* get_inner_set() { return &_set; }

void set_pb(PInFilter* filter, auto f) {
for (auto v : _set) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

better use reference in std::string

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

1 similar comment
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

yiguolei
yiguolei previously approved these changes Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@yiguolei yiguolei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 25, 2024
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt merged commit 137ed95 into apache:master Nov 26, 2024
26 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants