Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

branch-3.0: [opt](auto-inc) Allow to miss auto-increment column and other value columns in partial update #44528 #44800

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #44528

…olumns in partial update (#44528)

Previously, if a partial update misses auto-increment key columns and
other value columns, the load will fail with error `distributed column
not found, column=xxx`. Considering the uniqueness of the generated
value of auto-increment column, this PR converts the partial update load
to upsert in this situation to make it llegal.

### Release note

Allow to miss auto-increment key column and other value columns in
partial update load
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Nov 29, 2024
@doris-robot
Copy link

run buildall

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit bef24e3 into branch-3.0 Dec 3, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-44528-branch-3.0 branch December 3, 2024 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants