Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

branch-3.0: [opt](mtmv) Optimize plan generate when create mtmv and use mtmv cache when collect table of mtmv #44786 #45022

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Cherry-picked from #44786

…e when collect table of mtmv (#44786)

Optimize plan generate when create mtmv and use mtmv cache when collect
table of mtmv
1. Reuse plans when creating materialized views to minimize plan
generation overhead.
2. During recursive base table resolution for MTMVs, prioritize MTMV
cache lookup. Fall back to real-time generation only when cache miss
occurs.
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring closed this Dec 5, 2024
@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Dec 5, 2024
@doris-robot
Copy link

run buildall

@morrySnow morrySnow closed this Dec 9, 2024
@morrySnow morrySnow deleted the auto-pick-44786-branch-3.0 branch December 9, 2024 16:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants