WIP[HIVE-28601]: Please do not review #5539
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e memory footprint in HS2
armitage420
force-pushed
the
HIVE-28601
branch
from
0f06bdf
to
9863caf
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Leverage configurable getPartitionsWithSpecs API in HMS to decrease memory footprint in HS2
Why are the changes needed?
The primary motivation behind these changes is to optimize the performance of certain API calls within HS2. These calls often require specific elements, such as say location, without needing the complete storage descriptor in partition object. Transmitting the full object in these cases results in unnecessary overhead and resource consumption. By leveraging the getPartitionsWithSpecs API, we can fetch only the necessary Partition's sub-objects, thereby reducing the memory footprint and hence reducing unnecessary network usage.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
Is the change a dependency upgrade?
No
How was this patch tested?
Local machine