Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kogito-8116 Sonarcloud - Addressing code smells related to unmerged collapsible if statements, empty statements, and various "bug fixes" #2555

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

kbowers-ibm
Copy link
Contributor

@kbowers-ibm kbowers-ibm commented Oct 13, 2022

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/KOGITO-8116

Goal here is to reduce the number of code smells and bugs in Kogito-runtimes.

Addressed in this PR are the following code smells and bugs:

(Java) Empty statements should be removed (8): https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS1116&types=CODE_SMELL&id=org.kie.kogito%3Akogito-runtimes
I have addressed this by removing empty statements, i.e. random semicolons

(Java) Collapsible "if" statements should be merged (9): https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS1066&types=CODE_SMELL&id=org.kie.kogito%3Akogito-runtimes
I have addressed this by merging if statements where appropriate.

Various "bug fixes" https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&types=BUG&id=org.kie.kogito%3Akogito-runtimes
including:

  • "ThreadLocal" variables should be cleaned up when no longer used

  • Null pointers should not be dereferenced

  • Math operands should be cast before assignment

  • You have read the contributors guide

  • Your code is properly formatted according to this configuration

  • Pull Request title is properly formatted: KOGITO-XYZ Subject

  • Pull Request title contains the target branch if not targeting main: [0.9.x] KOGITO-XYZ Subject

  • Pull Request contains link to the JIRA issue

  • Pull Request contains link to any dependent or related Pull Request

  • Pull Request contains description of the issue

  • Pull Request does not include fixes for issues other than the main ticket

How to replicate CI configuration locally?

Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.

build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.

How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
  • for pull request checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins retest this

  • for a specific pull request check
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests

  • for quarkus branch checks
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch

  • for a quarkus branch specific check
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch

  • for quarkus main checks
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main

  • for a specific quarkus main check
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main

  • for quarkus lts checks
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts

  • for a specific quarkus lts check
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts

  • for native checks
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native

  • for a specific native check
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native

  • for mandrel checks
    Run native checks against Mandrel image
    Please add comment: Jenkins run mandrel

  • for a specific mandrel check
    Run native checks against Mandrel image
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] mandrel

  • for mandrel lts checks
    Run native checks against Mandrel image and quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run mandrel-lts

  • for a specific mandrel lts check
    Run native checks against Mandrel image and quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] mandrel-lts

  • Full Kogito testing (with cloud images and operator BDD testing)
    Please add comment: Jenkins run BDD
    This check should be used only if a big change is done as it takes time to run, need resources and one full BDD tests check can be done at a time ...

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 3 Code Smells

72.2% 72.2% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@kbowers-ibm kbowers-ibm marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2022 06:44
@baldimir
Copy link
Contributor

baldimir commented Oct 4, 2023

Hi @kbowers-ibm, @elguardian, is this still relevant please? If yes, could you please rebase with the latest changes from main?

@kbowers-ibm kbowers-ibm removed the request for review from elguardian January 2, 2024 14:55
# Conflicts:
#	jbpm/jbpm-flow-builder/src/main/java/org/jbpm/compiler/xml/processes/RuleSetNodeHandler.java
@kbowers-ibm kbowers-ibm closed this Jan 3, 2024
@kbowers-ibm kbowers-ibm deleted the KOGITO-8116 branch August 15, 2024 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants