Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[kie-issues-249] Data Index Events changes for allowing historical data #3231

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

elguardian
Copy link
Contributor

@elguardian elguardian changed the title [kie-issues-249] Data index improvements [kie-issues-249] Data Index Events changes for allowing historical data Sep 19, 2023
Copy link
Member

@porcelli porcelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

file headers should be updated to Apache

assertThat(body.getNodeInstances()).extractingResultOf("getTriggerTime").allMatch(v -> v != null);
assertThat(body.getNodeInstances()).extractingResultOf("getLeaveTime").allMatch(v -> v != null);

assertProcessInstanceEvent(events.get(3), "UserTasksProcess", "UserTasksProcess", 2);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@elguardian this test is failing here... I can fix it with this:

Suggested change
assertProcessInstanceEvent(events.get(3), "UserTasksProcess", "UserTasksProcess", 2);
assertNodeInstanceEvent(events.get(3), processInstance.id(), "End Event 1", 1);

Copy link
Contributor

@pefernan pefernan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 as soon as we have some greens :D

@elguardian
Copy link
Contributor Author

build now

@elguardian
Copy link
Contributor Author

build now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants