Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PipeConsensus: complete consensus prodedure and pipe components with new thrift service #12355

Merged
merged 121 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

Pengzna
Copy link
Collaborator

@Pengzna Pengzna commented Apr 16, 2024

@Pengzna Pengzna changed the title PipeConsensus: initialize thrift service PipeConsensus: initialize thrift service & connector and receiver logic Apr 16, 2024
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-requested a review April 16, 2024 15:07
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-assigned this Apr 16, 2024
Pengzna added 4 commits May 30, 2024 21:59
…sensus

# Conflicts:
#	iotdb-core/datanode/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-datanode.properties
…sensus

# Conflicts:
#	iotdb-core/node-commons/src/assembly/resources/conf/iotdb-system.properties
Copy link
Contributor

@OneSizeFitsQuorum OneSizeFitsQuorum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should add two more consensus class in line82
image

Copy link
Contributor

@OneSizeFitsQuorum OneSizeFitsQuorum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@OneSizeFitsQuorum OneSizeFitsQuorum merged commit 9000bad into apache:master May 31, 2024
36 of 38 checks passed
SzyWilliam pushed a commit to SzyWilliam/iotdb that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
…new thrift service (apache#12355)

Co-authored-by: yschengzi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Caideyipi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Steve Yurong Su <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: OneSizeFitQuorum <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants