-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-18278] [Scheduler] Spark on Kubernetes - Basic Scheduler Backend #19468
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
29 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f6fdd6a
Spark on Kubernetes - basic scheduler backend
foxish 75e31a9
Adding to modules.py and SparkBuild.scala
foxish cf82b21
Exclude from unidoc, update travis
foxish 488c535
Address a bunch of style and other comments
foxish 82b79a7
Fix some style concerns
foxish c052212
Clean up YARN constants, unit test updates
foxish c565c9f
Couple of more style comments
foxish 2fb596d
Address CR comments.
mccheah 992acbe
Extract initial executor count to utils class
mccheah b0a5839
Fix scalastyle
mccheah a4f9797
Fix more scalastyle
mccheah 2b5dcac
Pin down app ID in tests. Fix test style.
mccheah 018f4d8
Address comments.
mccheah 4b32134
Various fixes to the scheduler
mccheah 6cf4ed7
Address comments
mccheah 1f271be
Update fabric8 client version to 3.0.0
foxish 71a971f
Addressed more comments
liyinan926 0ab9ca7
One more round of comments
liyinan926 7f14b71
Added a comment regarding how failed executor pods are handled
liyinan926 7afce3f
Addressed more comments
liyinan926 b75b413
Fixed Scala style error
liyinan926 3b587b4
Removed unused parameter in parsePrefixedKeyValuePairs
liyinan926 cb12fec
Another round of comments
liyinan926 ae396cf
Addressed latest comments
liyinan926 f8e3249
Addressed comments around licensing on new dependencies
liyinan926 a44c29e
Fixed unit tests and made maximum executor lost reason checks configu…
liyinan926 4bed817
Removed default value for executor Docker image
liyinan926 c386186
Close the executor pod watcher before deleting the executor pods
liyinan926 b85cfc4
Addressed more comments
liyinan926 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wasn't this not 10 earlier ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but I think 5 is a more sensible default than 10. @mccheah @foxish WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably keep it the same as before, as it's what we've been running with already.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, changed back to 10.