[SPARK-50642][CONNECT][SS]Fix the state schema for FlatMapGroupsWithState in spark connect when there is no initial state #49260
+92
−36
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In spark connect, when there is no initial state, we derived the state schema from the input:
create the initialDs from the original input: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/connect/server/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connect/planner/SparkConnectPlanner.scala#L679-L689
derived the state expression encoder from this
initialDs
which is incorrect: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/connect/server/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connect/planner/SparkConnectPlanner.scala#L729Our unit tests fail to cover this case because it doesn't do the state update: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/connector/connect/client/jvm/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FlatMapGroupsWithStateStreamingSuite.scala#L55-L59
after changing the
stateFunc
to the followingthe test is actually failing with
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
state_schema
proto fieldWhy are the changes needed?
fix the broken behavior for flatMapGroupsWithState on spark connect
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes
How was this patch tested?
modified the existing unit tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no