-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add barebones benchmark #177
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #177 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 56.37% 56.37%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1247 1247
=======================================
Hits 703 703
Misses 496 496
Partials 48 48 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
…ag in case its' neccesary
Following is the benchmark results with 3 different scenarios and scaling of contract tx infos (a higher amount of contract tx info might mean a different matter, such as an inneficient smart contract that requires multiple queries and calls):
P.D: Alot of contract tx info were placed in order to have extensive amount of points to graph |
This benchmark should be reworked on after #202 |
This will run a benchmark of
N Dapps with up to X contract racking infos
Ideally we can remove logs from the context logger and iterate with a testingtable and different weights in a single run rather than have to run each benchmark individually.