-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Ike's reaction in the PR if the state changes #145
Comments
isn't this more apropriately done by a new comment + update via status api ? |
@maxandersen I'd prefer to update the existing comment instead of adding new comments as this can confuse someone when reviewing the PR (specially if it has a lot of comments) |
then I would say better to use status api updates rather than comments. ie. like a failed build or linting check. Could also make the icon slightly smaller so it does not take up that amount of visual space :) |
It would be nice to display it in the newest Checks tab: https://help.github.com/articles/about-status-checks/#checks |
Hi guys, I finally got to this issue - sorry for the delay.
as for the update of the message hint - we have thee options here:
we do use it and we add also details link there to a page that explains what is going on, but nobody has noticed it obviously :-). There are two reasons why we add the comment there.
It is still possible to customize the message in every project separately by using a config file, so you can define your own message, that will be shorter and without any images.
First of all, we would have to make the Ike plugins a GH app, then we can use the checks tab. There is an issue for it: #59 |
So, my proposal is:
And yeah, the comment will be added only when the PR is submitted/updated by a commit that doesn't contain any test. |
…ed when status is changed
…ed when status is changed
About the plug-in that checks for tests in a PR, it would be nice if Ike's reaction (in the PR comment) were updated when the PR is updated.
Even though that the PR status changes accordingly, updating the comment with Ike's feedback would be a nice visual indicator for PR reviewers ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: