Fixes refactoring #34
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on transitioning from Jest to Vitest for testing, updating ESLint configurations, and modifying TypeScript settings. Key updates include the addition of a new ESLint rule to disable Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
asmyshlyaev177
force-pushed
the
fixes_refactoring
branch
from
b9eb45a to
f13b2e2
Compare
asmyshlyaev177
force-pushed
the
fixes_refactoring
branch
from
f13b2e2 to
3b7ac4f
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
packages/shared/components/Refresh.tsx (2)
5-6: Consider optimizing the memoization implementationWhile using
React.memois a good practice for performance optimization, the current implementation could be improved. The onClick handler and className composition are recreated on every render, potentially negating the benefits of memoization.Consider this optimization:
+const handleReload = () => { + window.location.reload(); +}; -export const RefreshButton = React.memo( - ({ className }: { className?: string }) => { +export const RefreshButton = React.memo(({ className }: { className?: string }) => { + const buttonClassName = clsx( + `transition font-extrabold bg-orange-700 text-lg text-white`, + className, + ); return ( <Button - onClick={() => { - window.location.reload(); - }} - className={clsx( - `transition font-extrabold bg-orange-700 text-lg text-white`, - className, - )} + onClick={handleReload} + className={buttonClassName} name="Reload page" > Reload page </Button> ); - }, );
8-19: Consider enhancing user experience and accessibilityThe button implementation could benefit from additional UX considerations:
- Add a confirmation dialog before reloading to prevent accidental clicks
- Provide visual feedback during the reload process
- Enhance accessibility with additional ARIA attributes
Consider this enhancement:
<Button - onClick={() => { - window.location.reload(); - }} + onClick={() => { + if (window.confirm('Are you sure you want to reload the page?')) { + window.location.reload(); + } + }} className={clsx( `transition font-extrabold bg-orange-700 text-lg text-white`, className, )} name="Reload page" + aria-label="Reload page" + role="button" > Reload page </Button>vitest.config.ts (2)
8-8: Consider expanding test file patternsThe current pattern might miss some test files. Consider adding support for
.specfiles which are commonly used in the ecosystem.- include: ["**/*.test.?(c|m)[jt]s?(x)"], + include: ["**/*.{test,spec}.?(c|m)[jt]s?(x)"],
18-21: Consider enhancing type checking configurationWhile the current setup with
dts: trueis good, consider adding explicit type checking options for better IDE support.AutoImport({ imports: ["vitest"], dts: true, // generate TypeScript declaration + // Add type checking options + typeCheck: true, + dtsDir: './types', }),packages/urlstate/parseSPObj.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
23-35: Consider adding more error test cases.While the migration to Vitest is correct, consider adding more error test cases to improve coverage:
- Test with malformed JSON structures
- Test with unexpected data types
- Test with missing required fields
Would you like me to help generate additional test cases?
packages/urlstate/subscribers.ts (2)
30-31: Consider improving type safety of the get methodThe current implementation uses type casting which could mask potential type errors. Consider a more type-safe approach.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- get: function <T extends JSONCompatible | undefined>(objKey: T): T | undefined { - return _stateMap.get(objKey as JSONCompatible) as T; + get: function <T extends JSONCompatible>(objKey: T): T | undefined { + return _stateMap.get(objKey) as T | undefined;This change:
- Narrows the input type to just
JSONCompatible- Makes the undefined return type explicit
- Reduces unnecessary type casting
Line range hint
6-8: Consider documenting the subscription lifecycle managementThe TODO comment raises valid concerns about clarity. While keeping React 17 compatibility is important, consider:
- Adding documentation about the subscription lifecycle
- Implementing safeguards against potential memory leaks
- Creating a migration plan for future React 18+ support
Would you like me to help create:
- Documentation explaining the current subscription model
- A proof-of-concept using useSyncExternalStore for future reference
packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint
24-31: Review HTML structure and meta tags placement.The current structure mixes
<link>,<meta>, and<script>tags in a non-standard order. Consider reorganizing the head section for better maintainability:<html lang="en"> + <head> + <meta name="google-site-verification" content="NKunqTB4Sd_Bp6zoIbzKvw_WoGB-v2-MXxC5mbKJKJw" /> + {isVercel && <link rel="canonical" href={vercelUrl}></link>} <link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com" /> <link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossOrigin="" /> - {/* {!isProd && <script src="https://unpkg.com/react-scan/dist/auto.global.js" async /> } */} - {isVercel && <link rel="canonical" href={vercelUrl}></link>} - <meta name="google-site-verification" content="NKunqTB4Sd_Bp6zoIbzKvw_WoGB-v2-MXxC5mbKJKJw" /> + </head> <body className={`${roboto.className}`}>
Line range hint
30-31: Consider combining analytics conditions.The separate conditional renders for Google Analytics and Vercel Analytics could be combined for better readability:
- {isProd ? <GoogleAnalytics gaId="G-5N8Y565DXK" /> : null } - {isProd && isVercel ? <Analytics /> : null} + {isProd && ( + <> + <GoogleAnalytics gaId="G-5N8Y565DXK" /> + {isVercel && <Analytics />} + </> + )}packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/Status.tsx (1)
Line range hint
8-52: Consider adding error handling and prop validationA few suggestions to improve robustness:
- Add prop validation for the urlState object to handle potential undefined values
- Consider wrapping the JSON.stringify calls in try-catch blocks
- The pre element has a hardcoded height which might cause content truncation
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const Status = React.memo(({ className, sp, ghLink }: { className?: string; sp?: object; ghLink: string; }) => { const { urlState } = useUrlState(form, { searchParams: sp, replace: false, }); + + const safeStringify = (value: unknown) => { + try { + return JSON.stringify(value); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to stringify value:', error); + return '""'; + } + }; + + if (!urlState) { + return <div>Loading...</div>; + } return ( <div className={`flex relative shadow-md hover:shadow-lg ${className} `}> <div className="font-semibold mb-2 "> Other client component </div> <h3>Types and structure of data are presered</h3> <div className="flex-none"> <pre className="max-h-[330px] text-sm overflow-y-auto text-gray-600 bg-white p-4 rounded-md shadow-inner break-all whitespace-pre-wrap" data-testid="parsed" > <div>{'{'}</div> <div className="ml-4"> - <div><b>name:</b> {urlState.name}</div> - <div><b>age:</b> {urlState.age}</div> - <div><b>agree:</b> {JSON.stringify(urlState.agree_to_terms)}</div> - <div><b>tags:</b> {JSON.stringify(urlState.tags, null, 2)}</div> + <div><b>name:</b> {urlState.name ?? ''}</div> + <div><b>age:</b> {urlState.age ?? ''}</div> + <div><b>agree:</b> {safeStringify(urlState.agree_to_terms)}</div> + <div><b>tags:</b> {safeStringify(urlState.tags)}</div> </div> <div>{'}'}</div> </pre> </div>packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.ts (1)
55-58: Consider enhancing type safety in setState implementationThe current implementation is functionally correct, but there's room for improvement in type safety:
Consider this alternative implementation for better type inference and runtime safety:
- const newVal = isFunc ? value(curr as T) : { ...curr, ...value }; - if (isEqual(curr, newVal)) return void 0; - stateMap.set(stateShape.current, newVal); - subscribers.get(stateShape.current).forEach((sub) => sub()); + const currentState = curr as T; + if (!currentState) { + console.warn('State unexpectedly undefined'); + return; + } + const newVal = isFunc + ? value(currentState) + : { ...currentState, ...value }; + if (isEqual(currentState, newVal)) return; + stateMap.set(stateShape.current, newVal); + subscribers.get(stateShape.current).forEach((sub) => sub());This refactor:
- Moves type assertion earlier for better type inference
- Adds runtime validation for unexpected undefined state
- Improves readability by breaking down the ternary operation
- Removes redundant void 0
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.ts (1)
34-34: Consider adding tests for deeply nested structures.The recursive handling of nested objects and arrays looks correct, but it would be beneficial to add test cases that verify:
- Deep object nesting (>5 levels)
- Mixed array/object structures
- Edge cases with empty objects/arrays
Would you like me to help generate comprehensive test cases for these scenarios?
Also applies to: 40-40
packages/urlstate/utils.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
133-190: LGTM with suggestions for additional test casesThe test coverage for
filterUnknownandfilterUnknownParamsClientis comprehensive and well-structured. Consider adding these edge cases:
- For
filterUnknownParamsClient:
- URL with malformed parameters
- Unicode characters in parameters
- For
filterUnknown:
- Nested shape objects
- Array values in entries
Also applies to: 195-234
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts (2)
9-10: LGTM! Consider consolidating mock setup.The migration to Vitest mocking is implemented correctly. However, since both mocks use the same options, consider consolidating them:
-vi.mock('../utils', { spy: true }); -vi.mock('../subscribers', { spy: true }) +const mockModules = ['../utils', '../subscribers'] as const; +mockModules.forEach(module => vi.mock(module, { spy: true }));
29-29: Enhance test descriptions for better clarity.While the test implementation is solid, some test descriptions could be more descriptive. Consider using the "it should" pattern to make the test's purpose clearer:
-test('always use getInitial', () => { +test('should always use getInitial value when running on server', () => { -test('when value empty return value from _getInitial', () => { +test('should return value from getInitial when stateMap is empty', () => { -test('should get value from stateMap without getInitial', () => { +test('should retrieve existing value from stateMap without calling getInitial', () => { -test('should set value if not in stateMap', () => { +test('should initialize stateMap with default value when empty', () => { -test('should return state', () => { +test('should return current state through both state and getState()', () => { -test('should set stateMap and subscribers', async () => { +test('should properly initialize stateMap and setup subscribers', async () => {Also applies to: 42-42, 57-57, 77-77, 100-100, 108-108
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts (4)
24-24: Consider usingstructuredCloneinstead of spread operatorThe spread operator performs a shallow clone, which might not be sufficient for nested objects. For consistency with other tests in this file and to ensure deep cloning, consider using
structuredClone.-const obj = { ...obj1 } +const obj = structuredClone(obj1)
Line range hint
267-273: Remove console.log and consider proper benchmarkingConsole.log statements should be removed from test files. For performance testing, consider using Vitest's built-in benchmarking capabilities or a dedicated benchmarking library.
test('encode/decode', () => { - const a1 = performance.now(); const result = decode(encode(bigObj)); - const a2 = performance.now(); - console.log('encode time', a2 - a1 + ' milliseconds'); expect(result).toStrictEqual(bigObj); });
277-277: Fix typo in test descriptionThe test description contains a typo: "specia" should be "special".
- test('should encode with specia symbols', () => { + test('should encode with special symbols', () => {
Line range hint
286-294: Consider organizing primitive type tests into separate test casesThe current test combines multiple unrelated primitive types into a single test. Consider splitting these into separate, focused test cases for better readability and maintenance.
describe('primitive type handling', () => { test('should handle null and undefined', () => { expect(decodePrimitive(null as unknown as string)).toStrictEqual(null); }); test('should handle boolean values', () => { expect(decodePrimitive(false as unknown as string)).toStrictEqual(false); expect(decodePrimitive(true as unknown as string)).toStrictEqual(true); }); // ... similar groupings for numbers, arrays, objects, strings });package.json (1)
354-354: Review coverage reporting strategyThe addition of both
@vitest/coverage-istanbulandnycseems redundant as they serve similar purposes. Consider using only one coverage reporting tool to avoid confusion and potential conflicts.Additionally, consider pinning exact versions (
^allows minor updates) to ensure consistent builds:- "@vitest/coverage-istanbul": "^2.1.5", - "happy-dom": "^15.11.6", - "nyc": "^17.1.0", - "unplugin-auto-import": "^0.18.5", - "vitest": "^2.1.5", + "@vitest/coverage-istanbul": "2.1.5", + "happy-dom": "15.11.6", + "nyc": "17.1.0", + "unplugin-auto-import": "0.18.5", + "vitest": "2.1.5",Also applies to: 368-368, 371-371, 385-386
packages/urlstate/useUrlStateBase/useUrlStateBase.test.ts (2)
3-3: Remove commented out import statementThe commented import from testUtils appears to be unused and should be removed to maintain clean code.
-// import { advanceTimersByTime } from '../../../tests/testUtils';
45-52: Consider grouping related cleanup operationsThe afterEach block contains a good mix of cleanup operations. Consider grouping them by functionality for better readability:
afterEach(() => { // Reset mocks router.push.mockReset(); router.replace.mockReset(); + // Reset Vitest state vi.resetModules() vi.restoreAllMocks() + // Reset timers and globals vi.useRealTimers() vi.unstubAllGlobals(); })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.eslintrc.cjs(1 hunks).vscode/launch.json(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)auto-imports.d.ts(1 hunks)jest.config.ts(0 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json(1 hunks)packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/Status.tsx(2 hunks)packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/shared/components/Refresh.tsx(1 hunks)packages/urlstate/encodeState/encodeState.test.ts(8 hunks)packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts(7 hunks)packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/parseSPObj.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/subscribers.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/testUtils.ts(0 hunks)packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts(11 hunks)packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.ts(1 hunks)packages/urlstate/useUrlEncode/useUrlEncode.test.tsx(4 hunks)packages/urlstate/useUrlStateBase/useUrlStateBase.test.ts(19 hunks)packages/urlstate/utils.test.ts(7 hunks)setup-tests.ts(1 hunks)tests/testUtils.ts(0 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)vitest.config.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- jest.config.ts
- packages/urlstate/testUtils.ts
- tests/testUtils.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- .vscode/launch.json
- README.md
- auto-imports.d.ts
- packages/urlstate/encodeState/encodeState.test.ts
- packages/urlstate/useUrlEncode/useUrlEncode.test.tsx
- setup-tests.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts
[error] 25-26: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 325-325: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts
[error] 58-58: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
[error] 78-78: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
[error] 110-110: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Verify monorepo structure.
Setting root: true is appropriate for preventing ESLint config inheritance in a monorepo structure.
✅ Verification successful
Setting root: true is correct and properly configured
The root: true setting in packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json is correctly configured as:
- The repository follows a monorepo structure with multiple packages
- The root
.eslintrc.cjsexplicitly ignores the nextjs14 package - The package uses Next.js specific ESLint configuration which should be isolated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify monorepo structure and ESLint configurations
# Expected: Multiple package directories and consistent ESLint configurations
# Check for package.json files to confirm monorepo structure
fd package.json packages/
# Check for other ESLint configs to ensure consistency
fd .eslintrc packages/
Length of output: 270
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for all ESLint config files including .eslintrc.* variations
fd -e json -e js -e cjs -e yaml -e yml '\.eslintrc' .
# Also check root level ESLint config
ls -la .eslintrc* 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of root ESLint config to understand the inheritance structure
cat .eslintrc.cjs
# And check the content of the package under review
cat packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json
Length of output: 1098
4-6: Please document the rationale for disabling react/display-name.
While disabling this rule is sometimes necessary (e.g., when using HOCs or dynamic components extensively), it can impact component debugging. Could you explain the specific use case that requires this change?
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that there are several React components using React.memo() and anonymous components, particularly in the codebase. The most notable examples are:
RefreshButtoninpackages/shared/components/Refresh.tsxStatuscomponent inpackages/example-nextjs14/src/app/Status.tsx
These components use React.memo() with anonymous function components, which would trigger ESLint's react/display-name rule. Disabling this rule makes sense in this context because:
- The components are already named through their export declarations
- The components are wrapped in
React.memo()for performance optimization - The debugging experience isn't significantly impacted as the component names are clear from their exports
The ESLint rule disable is justified for this codebase's architecture and component patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for anonymous component definitions that might justify disabling display-name
# Expected: Find instances where display-name would cause issues
# Look for potential HOCs or dynamic component definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export default React.memo($_)'
# Look for dynamic component definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function($_) {
return React.createElement($$$)
}'
# Look for forwardRef usage
ast-grep --pattern 'React.forwardRef'
Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for anonymous components and HOC patterns
# Search for anonymous arrow function components
rg "export\s+default\s+\([^)]*\)\s*=>" -g "*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}" -A 2
# Search for memo usage
rg "memo\(" -g "*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}" -A 2
# Search for forwardRef usage
rg "forwardRef\(" -g "*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}" -A 2
# Look for dynamic component creation patterns
rg "createElement|jsx" -g "*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js}" -A 2
# Check for files that might contain React components
fd -e tsx -e jsx -e js -e ts --exec head -n 20
Length of output: 65153
vitest.config.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are correctly structured.
The necessary dependencies are properly imported, following standard import ordering practices.
6-6: Verify the existence and content of setup-tests.ts
The configuration references a setup file that needs to be verified.
✅ Verification successful
Setup file exists and contains valid timezone configuration
The setup file exists and contains a proper global setup function that sets the timezone to "Asia/Tbilisi" for consistent date/time handling during tests.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if setup file exists and examine its content
if [ -f "setup-tests.ts" ]; then
echo "Setup file exists"
cat setup-tests.ts
else
echo "Setup file is missing"
fi
Length of output: 160
9-14: Verify coverage directory configuration
The coverage configuration looks comprehensive, but let's ensure the directory is properly gitignored and consistent with project standards.
✅ Verification successful
Coverage directory is properly configured in .gitignore
The verification confirms that both coverage-reports and nyc_coverage directories are properly listed in the .gitignore file, which aligns with the project standards and prevents coverage reports from being committed to the repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if coverage directory is in .gitignore
if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then
echo "Checking .gitignore for coverage directories..."
grep -E "coverage|coverage-reports" .gitignore
fi
# Check for existing coverage directories to avoid conflicts
ls -la | grep -E "coverage|coverage-reports"
Length of output: 254
4-23: Verify Jest to Vitest migration completeness
While the Vitest configuration looks good, let's ensure all Jest-specific code has been properly migrated.
.eslintrc.cjs (1)
25-25: Consider the implications of disabling react/display-name.
While this change aligns with the configuration in packages/example-nextjs14, disabling this rule could impact component debugging and React DevTools experience. Could you clarify the motivation behind this change?
Let's verify the consistency of this rule across the codebase:
If this change is necessary, consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why the rule is disabled
- Limiting the scope to specific files/patterns using
overridesif possible
✅ Verification successful
Disabling react/display-name is consistent with existing configurations
The change is consistent with the configuration in packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json where the same rule is disabled. Additionally, the root configuration explicitly ignores the Next.js example packages, so this change maintains consistency across the non-example parts of the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other ESLint configurations and react/display-name rule usage
# Expected: Find all ESLint configs and verify rule consistency
# Find all ESLint config files
echo "Searching for ESLint config files..."
fd -e .eslintrc.js -e .eslintrc.cjs -e .eslintrc.json
# Search for any explicit usage of display-name rule
echo "Checking for display-name rule usage..."
rg -l "display-name" -g '.eslintrc.*'
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of both ESLint configs to verify the rule consistency
echo "Content of root .eslintrc.cjs:"
cat .eslintrc.cjs
echo -e "\nContent of packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json:"
cat packages/example-nextjs14/.eslintrc.json
Length of output: 1290
packages/urlstate/parseSPObj.test.ts (1)
Line range hint 4-22: LGTM! Test migration looks good.
The test case has been successfully migrated from Jest to Vitest while maintaining the same functionality and assertions.
packages/urlstate/subscribers.ts (1)
3-3: Verify the impact of allowing undefined values in _stateMap
The type change from JSONCompatible to JSONCompatible | undefined is a breaking change that could affect consumers expecting non-undefined values.
Let's check for direct usage of _stateMap and potential affected code:
packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint 30-31: Verify analytics configuration across the application.
Let's ensure the Google Analytics ID is consistently used across the application and that there are no conflicting analytics configurations.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual analytics configurations to ensure there are no conflicts.
Analytics configuration is properly implemented with complementary services
The analytics setup is correctly configured with both Google Analytics and Vercel Analytics working complementarily:
- Google Analytics (via
@next/third-parties) is configured with a unique ID and only runs in production - Vercel Analytics is properly configured to run only on Vercel deployments
- Both packages are correctly listed in dependencies
- No conflicting configurations found between Next.js 14 and 15 examples
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Google Analytics ID usage
echo "Checking Google Analytics ID usage:"
rg -l "G-5N8Y565DXK"
# Search for other potential analytics configurations
echo "Checking for other analytics configurations:"
rg -l "GoogleAnalytics|@vercel/analytics"
Length of output: 436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of analytics configurations in both Next.js apps
echo "Content of example-nextjs14/src/app/layout.tsx:"
cat packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/layout.tsx
echo -e "\nContent of example-nextjs15/src/app/layout.tsx:"
cat packages/example-nextjs15/src/app/layout.tsx
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for analytics dependencies:"
cat packages/example-nextjs14/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "analytics"
Length of output: 3527
packages/example-nextjs14/src/app/Status.tsx (2)
8-8: Good use of React.memo for performance optimization!
The memoization is well-applied here since the component renders primarily based on props and contains expensive operations like JSON.stringify.
Line range hint 8-52: Verify the impact of memoization
Let's verify if this component is being rendered frequently enough to benefit from memoization.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results from the previous scripts, I can make a determination about the memoization:
Memoization is justified in this case
The evidence shows that:
- The Status component is used within Suspense boundaries and ErrorBoundaries in multiple places
- It's rendered alongside a Form component that likely triggers updates
- It receives URL search params (
sp) and className props that could change - There are test cases specifically for remounting the component (Status-for-test.tsx files)
- It's used in a data display context where preserving render performance is important
The memoization helps prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent components update or when sibling Form components trigger state changes, making it a worthwhile optimization in this case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for parent components that might trigger re-renders
rg -l "Status.*" --type tsx
# Check for potential prop changes in parent components
ast-grep --pattern 'const [^=]+ = useState($$$)'
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for parent components that might trigger re-renders, adjusting file pattern
rg -l "Status" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
# Look for the component's usage and state changes in parent components
rg -B 5 -A 5 "<Status"
# Check for potential prop changes by looking for useState hooks
rg "useState.*" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx
Length of output: 11307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the useUrlState hook implementation and its usage
rg -A 5 "useUrlState" --type ts --type typescript
# Look for form updates that might trigger re-renders
rg "form\." --type ts --type typescript
# Check the implementation of the Status component for any internal state or effects
rg -A 10 "export const Status" --type ts --type typescript
Length of output: 257
tsconfig.base.json (1)
20-20: LGTM! Vitest types integration looks correct.
The addition of "vitest/globals" aligns with the migration from Jest to Vitest and will provide the necessary type definitions for test files.
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-85: Overall implementation looks solid
The hook implementation follows React best practices with proper:
- Memoization using useCallback
- Cleanup in useInsertionEffect
- Type safety considerations
- Clear documentation
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM! Good defensive programming practice.
Early return for non-serializable types (function and symbol) prevents potential JSON.stringify errors and improves code robustness.
19-19: Verify browser compatibility for structuredClone.
While using structuredClone is good for preventing mutations, please consider:
- Browser compatibility - ensure your target browsers support it
- Performance impact for large objects - consider adding size limits or fallback mechanisms
✅ Verification successful
Browser compatibility for structuredClone is sufficient for the target browsers
The package's browserslist configuration in package.json targets modern browsers:
- Last 5 versions of Chrome and Firefox
- Firefox ESR
- Last 2 major versions of Safari and iOS
structuredClone is well-supported in these target browsers, being available since:
- Chrome 98+
- Firefox 94+
- Safari 15.4+
The implementation is also used consistently across the codebase for deep cloning objects, particularly in tests and encoding logic, indicating it's a deliberate choice for the library's functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's any polyfill or fallback mechanism for structuredClone
rg -l "structuredClone|polyfill" package.json
Length of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json files in all packages for browser targets and polyfills
fd package.json --exec cat {}
# Also check for any browser compatibility configurations
fd -e json -e js -e ts --exec rg -l "browserslist|targets|engines|compatibility"
# Check if structuredClone is used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "structuredClone" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 18558
packages/urlstate/utils.test.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Test function migrations look good!
The migration from it to test is consistent throughout the file and aligns with Vitest's preferred syntax while maintaining clear and descriptive test cases.
Also applies to: 11-11, 16-16, 22-22, 27-27, 31-31, 35-35, 40-40, 44-44, 48-48, 52-52, 56-56, 62-62, 66-66, 73-73, 82-82
105-106: LGTM: Good use of structuredClone!
The replacement of a custom clone function with the native structuredClone is a good improvement:
- More reliable deep cloning
- Better standardization
- Improved maintainability
Also applies to: 119-120, 123-124
129-131:
Verify mock reset behavior after migration
The change from jest.resetAllMocks() to vi.resetModules() might not provide equivalent functionality:
jest.resetAllMocks()resets mock statevi.resetModules()resets the modules registry
Consider using vi.resetAllMocks() instead to maintain the same behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Mock reset implementation is consistent with other test files
Looking at the codebase, the use of vi.resetModules() is consistent with other test files in the project. In fact, other test files like useSharedState.test.ts and useUrlStateBase.test.ts use vi.resetModules() along with vi.restoreAllMocks() for a complete reset of both modules and mocks. The current implementation follows the project's established patterns for Vitest.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other mock reset patterns in test files
rg "vi\.reset" -A 2 -B 2 "*.test.ts" "*.test.tsx"
Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files first
fd "\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 595
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mock reset patterns in test files using full paths
rg "vi\.reset|jest\.reset" packages/ -t ts -t tsx --glob "*test*" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mock reset patterns in test files using individual file paths
for file in $(fd "\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx)$"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "vi\.reset|jest\.reset" "$file" -A 2 -B 2 || true
done
Length of output: 3652
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts (4)
38-52: LGTM! Well-structured test with proper date handling
The test correctly handles nested date objects and uses appropriate methods for deep cloning and comparison.
25-26: Regarding delete operator usage in tests
While static analysis flags the use of the delete operator for performance reasons, this is test code where performance is not critical. The current implementation is clear and maintainable. If performance becomes a concern, consider using undefined assignment instead.
Also applies to: 325-325
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 25-26: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
310-328: LGTM! Comprehensive JSON parsing tests
The tests cover important scenarios including standard JSON, encoded values, and error handling cases.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 325-325: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
Line range hint 337-348: LGTM! Well-structured parameter parsing tests
The tests thoroughly cover parameter parsing scenarios including type conversion and null/undefined handling.
package.json (1)
148-148: Verify Vitest configuration setup
The transition from Jest to Vitest looks good. However, ensure that a vitest.config.ts file is properly configured with the necessary settings for your testing environment.
✅ Verification successful
Vitest configuration is properly set up
The vitest.config.ts file is present and correctly configured with:
- Test environment using
happy-dom - Code coverage reporting enabled with Istanbul
- Global test setup file referenced
- Auto-import plugin configured for TypeScript support
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Vitest configuration file and its content
if [ -f "vitest.config.ts" ]; then
echo "Vitest config found. Checking content..."
cat vitest.config.ts
else
echo "Warning: vitest.config.ts not found"
# Check for potential alternative locations
fd -e ts -e js -e mjs "vitest.config"
fi
Length of output: 701
packages/urlstate/useUrlStateBase/useUrlStateBase.test.ts (1)
Line range hint 54-548: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage
The test suite is well-organized with:
- Clear test descriptions and grouping
- Proper setup and teardown
- Specific assertions
- Good coverage of error cases and edge scenarios
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more Footnotes
|
asmyshlyaev177
force-pushed
the
fixes_refactoring
branch
from
3b7ac4f to
68576fb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts (4)
19-20: Optimize cleanup sequence in afterEachConsider reversing the order of cleanup operations for better reliability:
afterEach(() => { - vi.resetModules() - vi.restoreAllMocks() + vi.restoreAllMocks() + vi.resetModules() })This ensures that mocks are properly restored before module state is reset.
Line range hint
35-37: Enhance readability of spy assertionsConsider using
not.toHaveBeenCalled()instead oftoHaveBeenCalledTimes(0)for better readability:- expect(stateSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); - expect(stateSpySet).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(0); + expect(stateSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(stateSpySet).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
Line range hint
184-195: Enhance subscriber notification test coverageConsider expanding the test to verify:
- The actual value passed to the subscriber
- Multiple state updates
- The order of notifications
Example:
test('should notify subscribers when state changes', () => { const defaultState = { count: 0 }; const { result } = renderHook(() => useSharedState(defaultState)); const mockSubscriber = vi.fn(); subscribers.subscribers.add(defaultState, mockSubscriber); act(() => { result.current.setState({ count: 5 }); }); expect(mockSubscriber).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ count: 5 }); act(() => { result.current.setState({ count: 10 }); }); expect(mockSubscriber).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); expect(mockSubscriber).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith({ count: 10 }); });
Line range hint
262-269: Consider serialization implications and add type documentation
- The
Dateobject in thetagsarray might cause serialization issues when the state is shared or persisted. Consider using ISO string or timestamp instead.- Add JSDoc comments to document the purpose and constraints of each field.
Example:
/** Represents user form data with personal information and preferences */ type Form = { /** User's full name */ name: string; /** User's age (optional) */ age?: number; /** Whether user has agreed to terms and conditions */ agree_to_terms: boolean; /** List of user-selected tags with timestamps */ tags: { id: string; value: { text: string; // Consider using string | number instead of Date time: Date; } }[]; };packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts (4)
14-30: Consider making date tests timezone-independentThe test might fail in different timezones because it uses
new Date(2024, 10, 1)which is timezone-dependent. Consider usingnew Date('2024-11-01T00:00:00.000Z')for consistent results across different environments.-const obj1 = { num: 123, float: 1.55, bool1: false, und: undefined, date: new Date(2024, 10, 1) }; +const obj1 = { num: 123, float: 1.55, bool1: false, und: undefined, date: new Date('2024-11-01T00:00:00.000Z') };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 25-26: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
38-52: LGTM on structuredClone usage, but dates need timezone independenceThe use of
structuredCloneis a good practice for deep copying. However, the same timezone issue exists withnew Date(2019, 1, 1)andnew Date(2021, 1, 1).-dateObj: new Date(2019, 1, 1), +dateObj: new Date('2019-02-01T00:00:00.000Z'), ... -dateObj: new Date(2021, 1, 1), +dateObj: new Date('2021-02-01T00:00:00.000Z'),
Line range hint
267-273: Remove console.log and consider moving performance testThe console.log statement should be removed from the test. Consider moving the performance measurement to a separate benchmark suite or using proper performance testing tools.
-const a1 = performance.now(); const result = decode(encode(bigObj)); -const a2 = performance.now(); -console.log('encode time', a2 - a1 + ' milliseconds'); expect(result).toStrictEqual(bigObj);
Line range hint
277-294: Improve test descriptions and type handlingThe test descriptions could be more descriptive, and the type casting approach could be improved:
- "should encode with specia symbols" has a typo and unclear purpose
- "should value for other types" is grammatically incorrect
- Type casting with
as unknown as stringcould be replaced with proper typing-test('should encode with specia symbols', () => { +test('should handle special symbols for undefined and dates', () => { -test('should value for other types', () => { +test('should preserve values for various primitive types', () => { -expect(decodePrimitive(null as unknown as string)).toStrictEqual(null); +expect(decodePrimitive('null')).toStrictEqual(null);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
.vscode/launch.json(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)auto-imports.d.ts(1 hunks)jest.config.ts(0 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)packages/urlstate/encodeState/encodeState.test.ts(8 hunks)packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts(7 hunks)packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/parseSPObj.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/subscribers.ts(2 hunks)packages/urlstate/testUtils.ts(0 hunks)packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts(11 hunks)packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.ts(1 hunks)packages/urlstate/useUrlEncode/useUrlEncode.test.tsx(4 hunks)packages/urlstate/useUrlStateBase/useUrlStateBase.test.ts(19 hunks)packages/urlstate/utils.test.ts(7 hunks)setup-tests.ts(1 hunks)tests/testUtils.ts(0 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)vitest.config.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- jest.config.ts
- packages/urlstate/testUtils.ts
- tests/testUtils.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- .vscode/launch.json
- README.md
- auto-imports.d.ts
- packages/urlstate/encodeState/encodeState.test.ts
- packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.ts
- packages/urlstate/parseSPObj.test.ts
- packages/urlstate/subscribers.ts
- packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.ts
- packages/urlstate/useUrlEncode/useUrlEncode.test.tsx
- packages/urlstate/useUrlStateBase/useUrlStateBase.test.ts
- packages/urlstate/utils.test.ts
- setup-tests.ts
- tsconfig.base.json
- vitest.config.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts
[error] 25-26: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 325-325: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts
[error] 58-58: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
[error] 78-78: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
[error] 110-110: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/urlstate/useSharedState/useSharedState.test.ts (1)
58-58: Previous comment about void type assertions is still valid
The incorrect usage of void type in mock functions was previously identified and should be addressed.
Also applies to: 78-78, 110-110
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 58-58: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter.
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
packages/urlstate/encoder/encoder.test.ts (2)
310-331: LGTM! Comprehensive JSON parsing tests
The tests cover all important scenarios including standard JSON, encoded values, and error handling with fallbacks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 325-325: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
Line range hint 337-349: LGTM! Well-structured parameter parsing tests
The tests thoroughly cover parameter parsing, including edge cases with null/undefined values and type coercion.
package.json (2)
Line range hint 1-420: Ensure test coverage configuration is updated
The migration from Jest to Vitest requires updating the test coverage configuration. Please verify that a Vitest configuration file exists with appropriate coverage settings.
Let's check for the configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage configuration is properly set up
The Vitest configuration file (vitest.config.ts) already includes comprehensive coverage settings using Istanbul provider, with appropriate reporting formats (lcov, json, html) and output directory configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Vitest configuration exists and includes coverage settings
# Look for Vitest config files
fd -g "vitest.config.*"
# Check if coverage is configured in any other config files
rg -l "coverage|vitest" -g "*.config.*"
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of vitest.config.ts for coverage configuration
cat vitest.config.ts
Length of output: 580
354-354: Verify version compatibility of new testing dependencies
The new testing dependencies have been added to support the Vitest migration:
- @vitest/coverage-istanbul v2.1.5 for code coverage
- happy-dom v15.11.6 for DOM environment
- nyc v17.1.0 for additional coverage reporting
- unplugin-auto-import v0.18.5 for auto-importing Vitest functions
- vitest v2.1.5 as the core testing framework
Let's verify the compatibility between these versions:
Also applies to: 368-368, 371-371, 385-386
✅ Verification successful
Version compatibility verified for Vitest testing dependencies
The verification shows that:
- Vitest v2.1.5 and @vitest/coverage-istanbul v2.1.5 are correctly paired versions
- The vitest.config.ts properly configures happy-dom as the test environment
- unplugin-auto-import is correctly set up to import Vitest functions
- Istanbul coverage provider is properly configured with nyc integration
- All dependencies are properly integrated without any conflicting configurations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any peer dependency warnings or version conflicts
# Check for peer dependency issues
npm ls @vitest/coverage-istanbul happy-dom nyc unplugin-auto-import vitest
# Look for any package.json files in workspaces that might need updates
fd -g "package.json" -x grep -l "jest|vitest" {}
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check version compatibility
# Check direct dependencies in package.json
echo "=== Checking direct dependencies ==="
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
# Search for any vitest configuration files
echo -e "\n=== Searching for vitest config files ==="
fd -g "vitest.config.*"
# Look for any test files using vitest
echo -e "\n=== Searching for test files using vitest ==="
rg -l "import.*vitest|from.*vitest"
# Check if there are any remaining Jest configurations
echo -e "\n=== Checking for Jest configurations ==="
fd -g "jest.config.*"
rg -l "jest.config"
Length of output: 2561
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the vitest configuration and test setup
# Check vitest config content
echo "=== Checking vitest configuration ==="
cat vitest.config.ts
# Check for any potential version conflicts in test files
echo -e "\n=== Checking test file imports ==="
rg -A 5 "import.*vitest|from.*vitest"
# Check auto-imports configuration
echo -e "\n=== Checking auto-imports configuration ==="
cat auto-imports.d.ts
# Look for any remaining Jest usage
echo -e "\n=== Checking for remaining Jest usage ==="
rg -l "@testing-library/jest-dom|jest\." --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 3301
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
rollup.config.mjs (1)
2-2: Good choice switching to esbuild!The transition from terser to esbuild and the addition of JSON import assertions are solid improvements:
- esbuild provides significantly faster builds compared to terser
- The JSON module assertion follows the latest ECMAScript standards and improves type safety
Consider adding the following to maximize esbuild's benefits:
- Add a
treeShaking: trueoption to further optimize bundle size- Consider using esbuild for TypeScript transpilation instead of @rollup/plugin-typescript for even faster builds
Also applies to: 7-7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.eslintignore(1 hunks)package.json(5 hunks)rollup.config.mjs(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .eslintignore
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rollup.config.mjs (1)
28-32: Verify browser compatibility with ES2023 target
The esbuild configuration looks good, but the ES2023 target might be too aggressive depending on your browser support requirements.
Let's check the project's browser support requirements:
✅ Verification successful
Browser compatibility target aligns with project requirements
The project has explicit browserslist configuration targeting modern browsers:
- Last 5 versions of Chrome and Firefox (desktop & Android)
- Firefox ESR
- Last 2 major versions of Safari (desktop & iOS)
These modern browser targets fully support ES2023 features, making the current esbuild configuration appropriate for the project's requirements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check browser targets configuration and package.json for browserslist
# Check for browserslist config
echo "Checking for browserslist configuration..."
rg -l "browserslist"
# Check package.json for browser/engines fields
echo "Checking package.json for browser support..."
fd -t f "package.json" -x jq -r '.browserslist, .engines, .browser'
# Look for any explicit browser support documentation
echo "Checking for browser support documentation..."
rg -i "browser.*support" -g "!node_modules"
Length of output: 1148
package.json (4)
Line range hint 353-386: Clean up remaining Jest dependencies in workspace packages
While the root package.json has been updated with Vitest dependencies, workspace packages might still contain Jest-related dependencies that should be removed.
148-148: Verify test files compatibility with Vitest
The test command has been updated to use Vitest, which is good. However, based on previous reviews, there might still be Jest-style assertions in the test files that need to be updated.
Let's verify the test files migration status:
165-165: Verify Rollup configuration migration completeness
The Rollup configuration has been updated to use .mjs extension, supporting ES modules. Ensure this change is consistent across the workspace packages.
Also applies to: 290-290
✅ Verification successful
Rollup configuration migration is complete and consistent
The codebase has been fully migrated to use the .mjs extension for Rollup configuration. There is only one Rollup config file (rollup.config.mjs) and all references to it are consistent, using the .mjs extension in the package.json scripts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining .js Rollup configs
# Find any Rollup config files still using .js extension
fd -g "rollup.config.js"
# Check for any imports of Rollup config files
rg "rollup.config.js" -g "!package.json"
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any rollup configuration files and references more broadly
# Search for rollup config files with any extension
fd -e js -e mjs -g "*rollup.config*"
# Search for rollup config references in all files
rg -i "rollup.config"
# Also check package.json scripts for rollup references
rg "rollup" package.json
Length of output: 624
367-367: Review testing-related dependency versions
The new testing dependencies have been added, but we should verify if these are the latest stable versions compatible with the project's Node.js version:
Also applies to: 370-370, 378-378, 385-386
✅ Verification successful
All testing dependencies are at their latest stable versions
The verification confirms that all the specified testing dependencies in package.json are using the latest stable versions available on npm:
- happy-dom: 15.11.6
- nyc: 17.1.0
- rollup-plugin-esbuild: 6.1.1
- unplugin-auto-import: 0.18.5
- vitest: 2.1.5
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest stable versions of testing dependencies
# Check latest versions on npm
echo "Checking latest versions:"
npm view happy-dom version
npm view nyc version
npm view rollup-plugin-esbuild version
npm view unplugin-auto-import version
npm view vitest version
# Check Node.js compatibility
node -p "process.version"
Length of output: 287
Please follow contributing guidelines
PR title
Proposed Changes
Breaking Changes