fix:Simplify error handling in build-dashboard.js(#3305) #3309
Conversation
lakshaydewan
requested review from
derberg,
akshatnema,
magicmatatjahu,
anshgoyalevil,
Mayaleeeee and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve two main modifications. The Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
We require all PRs to follow Conventional Commits specification. |
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3309--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/ |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (2)
Line range hint
48-52: Improved error loggingThe error message now provides more context, which is beneficial for debugging. Good improvement!
Consider adding the error object to the log for even more detailed debugging information:
console.error( `There were some issues while parsing this item: ${JSON.stringify( discussion )}`, e );
155-172: LGTM: Improved error handling and code structureThe changes in this segment enhance the overall code quality:
- Added newlines improve code readability.
- Awaiting
writeToFileensures proper asynchronous execution.- Updated error handling in the
startfunction provides more context.- The newline at the end of the file follows best practices.
These changes improve the code structure and error handling, making it more robust and maintainable.
Consider adding more specific error messages to distinguish between different types of errors that might occur in the
startfunction. For example:try { // ... existing code ... } catch (e) { if (e.message.includes('API rate limit exceeded')) { console.error('GitHub API rate limit exceeded. Please try again later.'); } else if (e.message.includes('Network error')) { console.error('Network error occurred while fetching data from GitHub.'); } else { console.error('Unexpected error occurred while processing GitHub data:', e.message); } throw e; }This would provide even more detailed error information for debugging and user feedback.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- config/edit-page-config.json (1 hunks)
- scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (6 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- config/edit-page-config.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (5)
26-30: LGTM: Improved code formattingThe changes in this segment improve the readability of the code without altering its functionality. This is a good practice for maintaining clean and easily understandable code.
94-95: LGTM: Improved clarity and precisionThe added comment explains the calculation, enhancing code readability. Using
Math.floorensures we get a whole number of months, which is more appropriate for this context. These are good improvements.
Line range hint
115-129: LGTM: Improved error handling and code formattingThe changes in this segment enhance both the readability and the error handling of the code:
- The added newline after the console.log statement improves code formatting.
- The updated error handling in the catch block now provides more context by logging the error message before re-throwing it.
These changes will make debugging easier and improve the overall code quality.
132-147: LGTM: Enhanced error handling in getDiscussionByIDThe changes in the
getDiscussionByIDfunction improve error handling and code readability:
- The error message now includes the discussion ID, providing more context for debugging.
- The error is properly re-thrown after logging, ensuring that the error propagates correctly.
- The added newline at the end of the function improves code formatting.
These changes will make it easier to diagnose issues related to fetching specific discussions.
Line range hint
1-172: Overall assessment: Good improvements with room for further enhancementsThe changes in this file generally improve code quality, readability, and error handling. Key improvements include:
- Enhanced error messages providing more context for debugging.
- Better code formatting with added newlines.
- More precise calculations (e.g., using
Math.floorfor month calculations).Areas for potential further improvement:
- Consider using asynchronous file writing to prevent blocking the event loop.
- Implement more granular error handling in the
startfunction.- Ensure consistent use of async/await throughout the file.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of simplifying and improving error handling. Good job on enhancing the maintainability and robustness of the code!
|
|
||
| async function writeToFile(content) { | ||
| writeFileSync( | ||
| resolve(__dirname, '..', '..', 'dashboard.json'), | ||
| JSON.stringify(content, null, ' ') | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using asynchronous file writing
The newline addition improves code readability. However, the change from fs.writeFile to writeFileSync makes the operation synchronous, which could potentially block the Node.js event loop, especially for large files.
Consider using the asynchronous fs.promises.writeFile instead:
const { promises: fsPromises } = require('fs');
async function writeToFile(content) {
await fsPromises.writeFile(
resolve(__dirname, '..', '..', 'dashboard.json'),
JSON.stringify(content, null, ' ')
);
}This change would maintain the asynchronous nature of the operation and prevent potential blocking of the event loop.
|
Will fix these issues and raise the final PR soon on this issue .. |
This PR improves the error handling in the build-dashboard.js script by directly throwing errors instead of using Promise.reject(e). This makes the asynchronous functions more idiomatic and easier to maintain.
Key changes:
Replaced instances of Promise.reject(e) with throw e to ensure consistent error handling.
Cleaned up the error logging to provide clearer and more actionable error messages.
These changes improve the readability and robustness of the code, especially in cases where asynchronous functions need better error propagation.
Feel free to provide feedback or suggest any additional improvements!
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores
Documentation