Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it possible to time out after a deadline #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

sbarral
Copy link
Member

@sbarral sbarral commented May 15, 2024

No description provided.

@sbarral sbarral force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 867f51a to 972dfd0 Compare May 15, 2024 11:58
@sbarral sbarral force-pushed the feature/wait-until-or-timeout branch from 75d214e to 7cde07e Compare May 15, 2024 12:08
@sbarral sbarral merged commit 84ea682 into main May 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@Urgau
Copy link

Urgau commented May 24, 2024

Heads up, with the release of rust-lang/cargo#13913 (in nightly-2024-05-19), Cargo has now gain the ability to declare --check-cfg args directly inside the [lints] table with [lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg]1:

Cargo.toml:

[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo)'] }

Note that the diagnostic output of the lint has been updated to suggest the [lints] approach first. You can use it to guide you through the --check-cfg arguments that may need to be added.

Footnotes

  1. take effect on Rust 1.80 (current nightly), is ignored on Rust 1.79 (current beta), and produce an unused warning below

@sbarral
Copy link
Member Author

sbarral commented May 24, 2024

Heads up, with the release of rust-lang/cargo#13913 (in nightly-2024-05-19), Cargo has now gain the ability to declare --check-cfg args directly inside the [lints] table with [lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg]1:

HUGE thanks!

@sbarral sbarral deleted the feature/wait-until-or-timeout branch September 8, 2024 20:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants