Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(rxjs) update rxjs to be a peerDependency (v6 or v7) #120

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

krisdages
Copy link

Allows consuming projects to upgrade to rxjs 7 without a version
resolution override for aurelia-store.
Without this change, build systems would bundle both versions
and warn of the duplication.
Modifications:

  • Install RXJS 7 as a devDependency for the local build
  • Update TypeScript to 4.3 for compatibility with RXJS 7
  • Update other build devDependencies to fix build errors with new versions

Possible breaking changes:
rxjs would have to be installed in the consuming project, which might not be
automatic with older versions of npm. Anyone using the plugin would
likely already be using RXJS to interact with the store, though.

Allows consuming projects to upgrade to rxjs 7 without a version
resolution override for aurelia-store.
Without this change, build systems would bundle both versions
 and warn of the duplication.
Modifications:
- Install RXJS 7 as a devDependency for the local build
- Update TypeScript to 4.3 for compatibility with RXJS 7
- Update other build devDependencies to fix build errors with new versions

Possible breaking changes:
`rxjs` would have to be installed in the consuming project, which might not be
automatic with older versions of npm. Anyone using the plugin would
likely already be using RXJS to interact with the store, though.
@krisdages
Copy link
Author

krisdages commented May 28, 2021

I signed the CLA a few years ago for an update to the logging library. Hopefully it's still valid, but I can do it again if I need to.

Is the CI error below something I can resolve? The tests themselves passed, and the uncovered lines were already there in master.

@zewa666
Copy link
Member

zewa666 commented May 28, 2021

Thanks for the contrib @krisdages. The CLA is no longer needed so all good. Updating TS will certainly result in a breaking change so I'll give your PR a proper look next week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants