Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[StepSecurity] Apply security best practices #91

Conversation

step-security-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This pull request is created by StepSecurity at the request of @james-d-elliott. Please merge the Pull Request to incorporate the requested changes. Please tag @james-d-elliott on your message if you have any questions related to the PR.

Security Fixes

Least Privileged GitHub Actions Token Permissions

The GITHUB_TOKEN is an automatically generated secret to make authenticated calls to the GitHub API. GitHub recommends setting minimum token permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Pinned Dependencies

GitHub Action tags and Docker tags are mutable. This poses a security risk. GitHub's Security Hardening guide recommends pinning actions to full length commit.

Harden Runner

Harden-Runner is an open-source security agent for the GitHub-hosted runner to prevent software supply chain attacks. It prevents exfiltration of credentials, detects tampering of source code during build, and enables running jobs without sudo access.

Harden runner usage

You can find link to view insights and policy recommendation in the build log

Please refer to documentation to find more details.

Keeping your actions up to date with Dependabot

With Dependabot version updates, when Dependabot identifies an outdated dependency, it raises a pull request to update the manifest to the latest version of the dependency. This is recommended by GitHub as well as The Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Detect Vulnerabilities with SAST Workflow

Static Code Analysis (also known as Source Code Analysis) is usually performed as part of a Code Review (also known as clear-box testing) and is carried out at the Implementation phase of a Security Development Lifecycle (SDL). Static Code Analysis commonly refers to the running of Static Code Analysis tools that attempt to highlight possible vulnerabilities within ‘static’ (non-running) source code by using techniques such as Taint Analysis and Data Flow Analysis.

Add Dependency Review Workflow

The Dependency Review Workflow enforces dependency reviews on your pull requests. The action scans for vulnerable versions of dependencies introduced by package version changes in pull requests, and warns you about the associated security vulnerabilities. This gives you better visibility of what's changing in a pull request, and helps prevent vulnerabilities being added to your repository.

Add OpenSSF Scorecard Workflow

OpenSSF Scorecard is an automated tool that assesses a number of important heuristics ("checks") associated with software security and assigns each check a score of 0-10. You can use these scores to understand specific areas to improve in order to strengthen the security posture of your project.

Scorecard workflow also allows maintainers to display a Scorecard badge on their repository to show off their hard work.

Maintain Code Quality with Pre-Commit

Pre-commit is a framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks. Hooks can be any scripts, code, or binaries that run at any stage of the git workflow. Pre-commit hooks are useful for enforcing code quality, code formatting, and detecting security vulnerabilities.

Feedback

For bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback; please email [email protected]. To create such PRs, please visit https://app.stepsecurity.io/securerepo.

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot [email protected]

@step-security-bot step-security-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2024 10:59
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the automation and security of the development workflow through the introduction of multiple GitHub Actions workflows and a pre-commit configuration. Key changes include automated dependency updates via Dependabot, security analysis using CodeQL and Scorecard, and improved permission settings. Additionally, the incorporation of pre-commit hooks for code quality checks ensures that best practices are maintained throughout the development process.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/dependabot.yml Introduced configuration for Dependabot to automate dependency updates for GitHub Actions, Go modules, and npm with a daily check schedule.
.github/workflows/*.yml Added several workflows including CodeQL analysis, dependency review, and Scorecard for security assessment, with enhanced security measures and permission settings.
.pre-commit-config.yaml Configured new pre-commit hooks for Gitleaks, GolangCI-Lint, and shell script checks to improve code quality and security before commits.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GitHub
    participant Dependabot
    participant CodeQL
    participant Scorecard

    Developer->>GitHub: Push code
    GitHub->>Dependabot: Check for dependency updates
    Dependabot->>GitHub: Create PR for updates
    GitHub->>CodeQL: Trigger security analysis
    CodeQL->>GitHub: Report vulnerabilities
    GitHub->>Scorecard: Run supply-chain security checks
    Scorecard->>GitHub: Provide security metrics
    Developer->>GitHub: Review PR and merge
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d3bf80 and d8dffb5.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/format.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/generate.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scorecards.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/dependabot.yml
Additional comments not posted (29)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (4)

2-5: Approved: Gitleaks pre-commit hook configuration.

The gitleaks repository URL, version pinning, and hook configuration are correct.


6-9: Approved: Golangci-lint pre-commit hook configuration.

The golangci-lint repository URL, version pinning, and hook configuration are correct.


10-13: Approved: Shellcheck pre-commit hook configuration.

The shellcheck repository URL, version pinning, and hook configuration are correct.


14-18: Approved: Pre-commit hooks configuration.

The pre-commit-hooks repository URL, version pinning, and hooks configuration are correct.

.github/workflows/test.yml (4)

11-13: Approved: Permissions configuration.

The permissions section correctly specifies read access to repository contents, adhering to the principle of least privilege.


18-22: Approved: Harden Runner configuration.

The Harden Runner step is correctly configured with the step-security/harden-runner action and an egress-policy set to audit, enhancing security monitoring.


23-23: Approved: Actions checkout version update.

The actions/checkout step is correctly updated to a specific commit version, enhancing security and stability.


24-26: Approved: Actions setup-go version update.

The actions/setup-go step is correctly updated to a specific commit version, enhancing security and stability.

.github/workflows/format.yml (4)

11-13: Approved: Permissions configuration.

The permissions section correctly specifies read access to repository contents, adhering to the principle of least privilege.


18-22: Approved: Harden Runner configuration.

The Harden Runner step is correctly configured with the step-security/harden-runner action and an egress-policy set to audit, enhancing security monitoring.


23-23: Approved: Actions checkout version update.

The actions/checkout step is correctly updated to a specific commit version, enhancing security and stability.


24-26: Approved: Actions setup-go version update.

The actions/setup-go step is correctly updated to a specific commit version, enhancing security and stability.

.github/workflows/generate.yml (4)

11-13: Least Privileged Permissions Applied

The addition of the permissions section with contents: read aligns with the principle of least privilege, enhancing security.


18-22: Harden Runner Step Added

The "Harden Runner" step enhances security by monitoring outbound traffic, which helps prevent supply chain attacks.


23-23: Pinned actions/checkout Version

Pinning the actions/checkout action to a specific commit hash ensures stability and security by using a known version.


24-24: Pinned actions/setup-go Version

Pinning the actions/setup-go action to a specific commit hash ensures stability and security by using a known version.

.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (3)

1-9: Clear Header Comments

The header comments provide a clear overview of the workflow's purpose and source, aiding in understanding and maintenance.


12-14: Least Privileged Permissions Applied

The permissions section with contents: read aligns with the principle of least privilege, enhancing security.


15-27: Secure Job Steps

The job steps, including hardening the runner, checking out the repository, and performing a dependency review, align with security best practices.

.github/workflows/codeql.yml (5)

1-12: Clear Header Comments

The header comments provide a clear overview of the workflow's purpose and instructions for customization, aiding in understanding and maintenance.


14-22: Appropriate Trigger Events

The workflow is triggered on push and pull request events to the master branch and on a schedule, ensuring regular and event-driven analysis.


23-25: Least Privileged Permissions Applied

The permissions section with contents: read and security-events: write aligns with the principle of least privilege, enhancing security.


35-41: Appropriate Job Strategy and Matrix

The job strategy includes a fail-fast setting and a matrix for the Go language, ensuring efficient and comprehensive analysis.


42-78: Secure Job Steps

The job steps, including hardening the runner, checking out the repository, initializing CodeQL, autobuilding, and performing CodeQL analysis, align with security best practices.

.github/workflows/scorecards.yml (5)

1-5: LGTM! Informative header and correctly defined workflow name.

The header provides necessary information about third-party actions, and the workflow name is appropriately set.


6-15: LGTM! Well-defined triggers for the workflow.

The triggers include branch protection rules, a schedule for regular updates, and push events, which align with the security objectives.


17-31: LGTM! Appropriate permissions set for the workflow.

Default permissions are set to read-only, with necessary write permissions for security events and id-token, adhering to security best practices.


20-76: LGTM! Well-structured job for security analysis.

The jobs section includes steps for hardening the runner, checking out the code, running the analysis, and uploading results. Pinned dependencies are used, enhancing security.


63-76: LGTM! Final steps ensure visibility and traceability of security analysis.

Uploading the SARIF results as artifacts and to the code scanning dashboard is a best practice for maintaining security visibility.

.github/dependabot.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: James Elliott <[email protected]>
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott self-requested a review July 29, 2024 11:04
@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott merged commit 1e3445e into authelia:master Jul 29, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants