-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Podman to Platforms #856
Conversation
Podman should work as a drop-in replacement for Docker for 99 (if not 100) percent of software in the list (Cloud Seeder seems to be the exception, in the opposite way). In fact I have moved all my docker-based services to Podman without any problems. The "correct" platform name would be As for adding the Other opinions welcome. |
I see, I see. yeah that'd be a massive burden to just add the podman tag everywhere, and just for a single software, this change needs to be warranted for multiple software projects. I'll wait for raben and Kier's opinions on this, and of course others. |
I don't have much to add since I haven't personally used Podman and wasn't aware of the whole OCI concept. However, I fully agree with nodiscc's point; changing the platform name from Also, adding Podman as a tag and then applying it to all Docker projects seems unnecessary. If nodiscc’s statement about compatibility is true, it would just be redundant information. We could add it as a tag to indicate that specific install instructions for Podman are available, but I'm not a fan of this either, as it's not really the purpose of a platform tag either. |
Agreed. Closing for now. |
Thank you guys for your input :) 💯 |
This adds podman to the platforms list, so we can add Podman support without it erroring out, ref, #836 I think the description from docker works, I just added from Red Hat to distingush it from Docker. Feel free to suggest a better description!