Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AWS Config proactive evaluation hook #261

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

tschia
Copy link
Contributor

@tschia tschia commented Jan 29, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Add hook that works with AWS Config proactive evaluations

Unit tests

[INFO] Running com.awssamples.configproactiveeval.hook.PreUpdateHookHandlerTest
[INFO] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 13.915 s - in com.awssamples.configproactiveeval.hook.PreUpdateHookHandlerTest
[INFO] Running com.awssamples.configproactiveeval.hook.PreCreateHookHandlerTest
[INFO] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.113 s - in com.awssamples.configproactiveeval.hook.PreCreateHookHandlerTest
[INFO] 
[INFO] Results:
[INFO] 
[INFO] Tests run: 18, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Contract tests exerpt

5 passed, 2 skipped, 17 deselected

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
# AWSSamples::ConfigProactiveEval::Hook
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be AwsCommunity::Config::ProactiveEval

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@ericzbeard ericzbeard merged commit 197eb94 into aws-cloudformation:main Feb 21, 2024
113 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants