Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New serverless pattern - IoT rule to SNS topic to SQS queue (Terraform) #1447

Conversation

MakendranG
Copy link
Contributor

@MakendranG MakendranG commented Jul 1, 2023

Issue #1448, if available:

Description of changes:
This pattern contains a sample AWS CFN stack to create an IoT Rule with a SNS action, a SNS Topic and a SQS standard Queue subscribed to the SNS topic.

When a message is published to the IoT topic defined in the IoT Rule, this message will be published to the SNS topic and finally the message will be delivered to the SQS queue subscribed to the SNS topic

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2023

@MakendranG your 'example-pattern.json' is missing some key fields, please review below and address any errors you have

  1. language: language is not one of enum values: TypeScript,Node.js,Python,Java,Go,Rust,.NET,OpenAPI,YAML
  2. framework: framework is not one of enum values: CDK,SAM,Terraform,Serverless Framework,Terraform (with modules),Pulumi

If you need any help, take a look at the example-pattern file.

Make the changes, and push your changes back to this pull request. When all automated checks are successful, the Serverless DA team will process your pull request.

@julianwood julianwood merged commit 1bcea7a into aws-samples:main Jul 4, 2023
0 of 2 checks passed
@MakendranG
Copy link
Contributor Author

@julianwood

Unable to edit the file as the PR is merged. Do I need to still make changes in example.json file ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants