feat(eks): add kubernetesGroups to AccessEntries

[markussiebert]

Issue # (if applicable)

Closes #30604

Reason for this change

Right now, it was not possible to set kubernetesGroups on AccessEntries and it was required to set AccessPolicies. Both were artificial limitiations, as Cloudformation nor the EKS Api behave like this.

With allowing kubernetesGroups, it's possible to define custom mappings of IAM Roles to (Cluster)RoleBindings.

Description of changes

No decisions, straight forward code

Description of how you validated changes

Created UnitTests

Checklist

• My code adheres to the CONTRIBUTING GUIDE and DESIGN GUIDELINES

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

[markussiebert]

Exemption Request

[valentin-vasile]

This is very much needed 🙏

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.64%. Comparing base (0e1854d) to head (7a6e50f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32074   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.64%   80.64%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines        6996     6996           
  Branches     1290     1290           
=======================================
  Hits         5642     5642           
  Misses       1175     1175           
  Partials      179      179           

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	80.64% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	80.64% <ø> (ø)

[markussiebert]

No on cares? So obvious feature ... ok will use escape hatches. I know how they work.

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 7a6e50f
• Result: FAILED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[gracelu0]

Hi @markussiebert , please add an integration test if possible. Let us know if you have any issues.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

[aws-cdk-automation]

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

[github-actions]

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Features must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.

PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review.

If you would like to request an exemption from the status checks or clarification on feedback, please leave a comment on this PR containing Exemption Request and/or Clarification Request.

✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.