Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Casting a DATE literal without time part to TIME datatype fails #1657
base: BABEL_3_X_DEV
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Casting a DATE literal without time part to TIME datatype fails #1657
Changes from 18 commits
3113bd6
94c338e
15364ef
63994c6
5970208
5abb533
ef3b0a5
aeaaf58
425667a
45d14ee
8d0cead
5256372
2b52253
165e5bf
8438f2a
d129287
95f935e
83c5c9b
9d9e3bc
a545dee
1be81a1
4e77880
897c4fa
a317305
f7c6a26
aa54d49
ae5430d
e9457a6
b5f22b9
a59fa96
3ce386a
edf89fb
c143d3f
58061ea
a222981
71aa6b5
9201ca5
4e9b59b
4c1c577
1f342f3
47150ec
35617aa
eae2cc4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we not overwriting temp_field again without freeing earlier memory?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, because when tried to pfree resulting in crash.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we always have ftype/fields allocated irrespective of number of fields (nfs)? Here we have nf =1 but we are assuming that f*[1] is also available
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we are initializing the
fields/ftype
with max count at initialization. Later when we go deep into the code thefield/ftype
values are checked based on thenf
count.