Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 20XOC-80USDC to pool allowlist: gnosis #3773

Conversation

0xdcota
Copy link

@0xdcota 0xdcota commented Jul 21, 2023

Description

Following described procedure here, I am adding 20XOC-80USDC pool on gnosis to the allowlist.

For cross-check the Pool_Id is on gnosis chain; 0xbc130c4989e10941142b34f054eb38d69fdce9df000200000000000000000049
The Pool token address is here

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [x ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Dependency changes
  • Code refactor / cleanup
  • Documentation or wording changes
  • Other

How should this be tested?

n/a

Please provide instructions so we can test. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration.

  • Test A
  • Test B

Visual context

Please provide any relevant visual context for UI changes or additions. This could be static screenshots or a loom screencast.

Checklist:

  • [x ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have requested at least 1 review (If the PR is significant enough, use best judgement here)
  • [x ] I have commented my code where relevant, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ x] If package-lock.json has changes, it was intentional.
  • [ x] The base of this PR is master if hotfix, develop if not

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 21, 2023

@daigarocota is attempting to deploy a commit to the Balancer Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@agualis agualis mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2023
14 tasks
@agualis
Copy link
Collaborator

agualis commented Jul 21, 2023

Replaced by #3774

@agualis agualis closed this Jul 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants