[NestedMultisigBuilder] Don't override signerSafe owner #105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Heimdall Review Status
|
jackchuma
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#97 introduced a small bug where the outer safe owner was unnecessarily overridden in the simulation. This owner override did not exist prior to this refactor, and is not needed because the simulation doesn't simulate the approval, but rather the inner nested sig tx action (i.e. what the outer signer sig is actually approving).
This PR removes this owner override. Fixes this issue: ethereum-optimism/superchain-ops#363 (comment)