[FIX] BE condition to check AMS terms agreed #3056
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s updates to BE test for this scenario
|
asinn134
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
henryoforeh-dev
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
simensma-fresh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
fix condition for ams terms agreed to match what is sent from FE, plus updates to BE test for this scenario
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
Nonewhen it should have been looking for data shaped like{amendments: [], new: []}MDS-5844
Why are you making this change? Provide a short explanation and/or screenshots