Permit Tracker View

[qhanson55]

Description

Created tracker page to replace the old tracker modal.
Better flow and viewing in the application for proponents so they can see all relevant information towards the permit.
PADS-360

Types of changes

New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Documentation (non-breaking change with enhancements to documentation)

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I have checked that unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Further comments

[github-actions]

Coverage Report (Frontend)

Totals
Statements:	24.68% ( 1641 / 6650 )
Methods:	19.98% ( 227 / 1136 )
Lines:	29.28% ( 957 / 3269 )
Branches:	20.36% ( 457 / 2245 )

[github-actions]

Coverage Report (Application)

Totals
Statements:	36.25% ( 1047 / 2888 )
Methods:	24.6% ( 123 / 500 )
Lines:	47.55% ( 698 / 1468 )
Branches:	24.57% ( 226 / 920 )

[naixin-zhangbc]

The look and feel is great, but there are some major issues. I'm not sure if all of them are part of this ticket/branch though.

• The empty status pill problem occurred on all permits that are added automatically from the intake form, including the permits from both the "permits you have submitted" and "permits you think you might need" sections.
• I see the permit cards in the Submitted Applications section are using the old design. I guess it's because the new design is not part of this branch?

I'm not sure if the followings are issues, or they are not showing properly because they aren't part of this branch.

• The submitted permits from the intake form shouldn't appear on Props' project page upon the intake submission. They should show after Navs finish their intake process. Maybe this issue is caused by the removal of the "needed" data from the rule for showing Submitted Applications? Might want to check with Wilson. This shows correctly on his branch. Upon intake form submission, this is what Props should see.

**But this is how it shows in this branch**

• This "status not available" should not happen either. This might be related to the issue above?

Once these questions are cleared up, I'll continue the review.

[slhurley]

Agree we might need to merge Wilsons work together with this to evaluate properly but any problems with the first page are not part of this PR. The only thing I noticed missing is the little ? icon beside "Application status and progress" doesn't do anything?