Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated README with 'table of content' and troubleshooting guidelines #2017

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Favy217
Copy link

@Favy217 Favy217 commented Sep 22, 2024

added Table of content for easy navigation, i also added possible fix to common errors devs may encounter

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a "Table of Contents" in the README for improved navigation.
    • Added a "Troubleshooting" section with common fixes for user issues.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced the README to provide clearer guidance on project structure and troubleshooting.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the README.md file, adding a "Table of Contents" section for better navigation and a "Troubleshooting" section that provides solutions for common user issues. The project status remains unchanged, indicating it is still a work in progress and not recommended for production use.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added "Table of Contents" and "Troubleshooting" sections. Existing content on project status remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

  • Docs: Update README #2009: The changes in this PR also involve updates to the README.md file, enhancing user navigation and accessibility, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving the document's structure and usability.

Suggested reviewers

  • ocnc
  • itsdevbear

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With a table of contents to light the way.
Troubleshooting tips, like carrots in a row,
Helping all users, as they learn and grow.
So let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
In the README we cherish, we share with all! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89f7411 and bb1dca0.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
README.md

25-25: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


26-26: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

LanguageTool
README.md

[uncategorized] ~87-~87: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...not starting**: Ensure Docker is running and you have enough allocated resources (RA...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)

Additional comments not posted (2)
README.md (2)

Line range hint 92-94: Important Status information retained

The Status section, although unchanged, provides crucial information about the project's current state and limitations. It's essential for users to understand that the project is still a work in progress and not recommended for production use.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~87-~87: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...not starting**: Ensure Docker is running and you have enough allocated resources (RA...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)


Line range hint 1-94: Overall, excellent improvements to the README!

The additions of the Table of Contents and Troubleshooting sections significantly enhance the document's usability and directly address the PR objectives. These changes will make it easier for users to navigate the README and resolve common issues.

A few minor formatting and grammatical suggestions have been made to further improve readability. Once these small adjustments are addressed, this PR will be ready for merge.

Great work on improving the documentation!

Tools
Markdownlint

25-25: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


26-26: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.30%. Comparing base (767e5b9) to head (a8e8b3b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2017      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.37%   22.30%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         358      354       -4     
  Lines       16065    16015      -50     
  Branches       13        0      -13     
==========================================
- Hits         3594     3572      -22     
+ Misses      12322    12294      -28     
  Partials      149      149              
Flag Coverage Δ
22.30% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@Favy217 Favy217 requested a review from ocnc September 25, 2024 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants