Datadog metrics

[itsdevbear]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• run make lint and make test
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated pull request template for clarity and consistency.
  • Revised checklist format in documentation to improve readability.

• Chores

  • Implemented a new weekly update schedule for dependencies in the /x/auth directory.
  • Reorganized directory assignments for better categorization in PR labeling.
  • Updated various GitHub Actions workflows to use the latest versions of actions for improved CI/CD processes.

• Refactor

  • Removed redundant deploy-docs.yml workflow to streamline documentation deployment.
  • Adjusted GitHub Actions workflows to refine testing and building for release branches.

• New Features

  • Introduced new fields in API modules to enhance configuration options for governance proposals and deposits.

• Bug Fixes

  • Corrected anchor link in CONTRIBUTING.md to ensure proper navigation.

• Style

  • Expanded the scope of modules included in Dockerfile copies for a more comprehensive build context.

• Tests

  • Updated testing targets in Makefile with new genesis file paths and flags for simulation tests.

• Revert

  • No changes to revert in this release.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes across various files reflect updates to GitHub Actions workflows, with a notable shift from setup-go v4 to v5, and other action versions being updated. Configuration files and templates have been reformatted, and new fields and methods have been added to Go structs, particularly in protobuf-generated files. The alterations suggest a broad update to dependencies, build processes, and the structure of exported entities, enhancing the project's functionality and maintainability.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/.../PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, .github/.../docs.md	Updated PR checklist formatting and headings
.github/dependabot.yml	Added new package-ecosystem schedule
.github/pr_labeler.yml	Reassigned directory categories
.github/workflows/...	Updated setup-go action from v4 to v5, and other action version updates
.github/workflows/lint.yml	Introduced Nix for environment setup and updated setup-go action
.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml	Updated github/issue-labeler action version
.github/workflows/issues.yml	Added comment for issue triage step
.github/workflows/lint-pr.yml	Updated amannn/action-semantic-pull-request action version
.github/workflows/proto-registry.yml, .github/workflows/proto.yml	Updated buf-setup-action version
.github/workflows/starship-tests.yml	Updated setup-go and starship-action versions, added cli-version parameter
.github/workflows/test.yml	Updated setup-go action version and go-version parameter values
.golangci.yml	Added new file patterns and build tags
CONTRIBUTING.md, README.md, RELEASE_PROCESS.md, UPGRADING.md	Modified markdown content and links
Dockerfile	Added new module copies
Makefile	Updated paths, flags, and URLs
api/.../module/v1/..., api/.../v1/...	Added fields and methods to Go structs, modified byte values

"In the warren of code, where the bytes do hop,
🐇 A rabbit did prance, with a skip and a bop.
With each pull and merge, the software takes shape,
🌟 A dance of the keys, an escape from the scrape."

---

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

• If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
• To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
• Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 6

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d903059 and 5ad56f5.

Files ignored due to filter (35)

• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/query_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/query_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/tx_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/tx_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/nft/v1beta1/query_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/query_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/tx_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/tx_grpc.pb.go
• api/cosmos/store/streaming/abci/grpc_grpc.pb.go
• api/go.mod
• api/go.sum
• client/docs/swagger-ui/favicon-16x16.png
• client/docs/swagger-ui/favicon-32x32.png
• client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml
• client/v2/go.mod
• client/v2/go.sum
• collections/go.mod
• collections/go.sum
• core/go.mod
• core/go.sum
• crypto/keys/secp256k1/keys.pb.go
• depinject/go.mod
• depinject/go.sum
• docs/user/run-node/category.json
• errors/go.mod
• errors/go.sum
• go.mod
• go.sum
• log/go.mod
• log/go.sum
• math/go.mod
• math/go.sum
• orm/go.mod
• orm/go.sum

Files selected for processing (53)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (2 hunks)
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/docs.md (2 hunks)
• .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/pr_labeler.yml (4 hunks)
• .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/dependencies-review.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/issues.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/lint-pr.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/proto-registry.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/proto.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release-confix.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release-cosmovisor.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/sims-047.yml (5 hunks)
• .github/workflows/sims-050.yml (5 hunks)
• .github/workflows/sims-nightly.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/sims.yml (4 hunks)
• .github/workflows/starship-tests.yml (2 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (50 hunks)
• .golangci.yml (1 hunks)
• CHANGELOG.md (13 hunks)
• CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
• Dockerfile (1 hunks)
• Makefile (4 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)
• RELEASE_PROCESS.md (3 hunks)
• UPGRADING.md (12 hunks)
• api/cosmos/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/account_abstraction.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (5 hunks)
• api/cosmos/auth/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (2 hunks)
• api/cosmos/authz/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/autocli/v1/options.pulsar.go (16 hunks)
• api/cosmos/bank/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/counter/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/query.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/distribution/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/distribution.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
• api/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/tx.pulsar.go (5 hunks)
• api/cosmos/gov/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (14 hunks)
• api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (16 hunks)
• api/cosmos/group/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
• api/cosmos/mint/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/query.pulsar.go (6 hunks)
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/types.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/slashing/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
• api/cosmos/staking/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (2 hunks)
• api/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/staking.pulsar.go (21 hunks)

Files not summarized due to errors (11)

• CHANGELOG.md: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/account_abstraction.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/query.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/counter/v1/tx.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/distribution.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/tx.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/query.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/types.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
• api/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/staking.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/docs.md
• .github/dependabot.yml
• .github/pr_labeler.yml
• .github/workflows/dependencies-review.yml
• .github/workflows/issues.yml
• .github/workflows/lint-pr.yml
• .github/workflows/proto-registry.yml
• .github/workflows/proto.yml
• .github/workflows/release-cosmovisor.yml
• .github/workflows/sims-047.yml
• .github/workflows/sims-050.yml
• .github/workflows/sims-nightly.yml
• .github/workflows/sims.yml
• .github/workflows/starship-tests.yml
• .golangci.yml
• CONTRIBUTING.md
• api/cosmos/bank/module/v1/module.pulsar.go

Additional comments: 182

.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

• 24-30: The update to actions/setup-go@v5 and the specification of Go version 1.21 with check-latest: true are correct and follow best practices for ensuring the latest patch version is used.

.github/workflows/dependabot-update-all.yml (2)

• 18-21: The update to actions/setup-go@v5 is correctly implemented and should provide the latest features and fixes from the action. Ensure that the specified Go version 1.21 is compatible with the rest of the codebase and the dependencies.

---

The update to actions/setup-go@v5 with Go version 1.21 is consistent with the Go version specified in the majority of the go.mod files in the codebase.

• 20-21: The check-latest flag is set to true, which is a good practice for ensuring the latest Go version is used. However, it's important to ensure that the CI pipeline and codebase are prepared to handle any potential breaking changes that could come with newer Go versions.

.github/workflows/issue_labeler.yml (1)

• 7-13: The update of the github/issue-labeler action from v3.2 to v3.3 is correctly implemented and should bring the benefits of the newer version, such as bug fixes or new features.

.github/workflows/lint.yml (3)

• 14-22: The changes to the workflow file correctly introduce the new Nix actions and update the setup-go action to version 5.

• 31-50: The introduction of environment variables NIX and GIT_DIFF and the use of Nix for the linting process are correctly implemented in the workflow.

• 31-50: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [14-50]

No issues found with the changes in the workflow file. The updates to the actions and the linting process are consistent with the PR objectives and the summary provided.

.github/workflows/release-confix.yml (1)

• 14-20: The update of the setup-go action to v5 is correct and aligns with the PR's objective to update GitHub Actions workflows.

.github/workflows/test.yml (3)

• 23-23: The summary indicates that the go-version parameter values have been updated from "1.21" to "1.20" in some places, but the hunks show that the go-version is consistently "1.21". Please verify this discrepancy.

Also applies to: 57-57, 91-91, 122-122, 200-200, 230-230, 263-263, 294-294, 325-325, 354-354, 385-385, 416-416, 452-452, 483-483, 514-514, 545-545, 576-576, 609-609, 640-640, 678-678, 709-709, 740-740, 771-771, 802-802, 833-833, 864-864, 895-895, 925-925, 955-955

• 428-431: The summary mentions updates to the go test commands where the tags parameter has been updated to remove the rocksdb_build tag. However, the hunks do not show any such modifications to the go test commands. Please verify this discrepancy.

Also applies to: 723-724, 754-755, 785-786, 816-817, 847-848, 878-879, 909-910, 939-940, 969-970, 999-1000, 1029-1030, 1060-1061, 1091-1092, 1122-1123, 1153-1154, 1184-1185, 1215-1216

• 21-21: The update of the actions/setup-go action version from v4 to v5 is consistent with the summary and is correctly applied across all instances.

Also applies to: 55-55, 89-89, 120-120, 198-198, 228-228, 261-261, 292-292, 323-323, 352-352, 383-383, 414-414, 450-450, 481-481, 512-512, 543-543, 574-574, 605-605, 638-638, 676-676, 707-707, 738-738, 769-769, 800-800, 831-831, 862-862, 893-893, 923-923, 953-953

CHANGELOG.md (20)

• 43-56: The changelog entries under "Features" correctly document new features added to the codebase. Each entry is associated with a pull request, providing traceability.

• 57-73: The "Improvements" section of the changelog lists various enhancements made across different modules. It is important to ensure that these improvements are reflected in the actual code changes and that the linked pull requests accurately describe the improvements made.

• 75-87: The "Bug Fixes" section details the fixes applied to various issues in the codebase. Each fix is linked to a pull request, which should contain the actual code changes and discussions around the fix.

• 89-94: The "API Breaking Changes" section is critical as it documents changes that may affect users of the codebase. It is essential to verify that these breaking changes are communicated clearly to developers and that the linked pull requests provide migration paths or additional context where necessary.

• 139-144: The entries here continue to document API breaking changes. It is important to ensure that these changes are necessary and that they have been communicated to the users of the library or application.

• 151-167: This section continues with API breaking changes, which are significant updates that may require users to modify their code. It is crucial to ensure that these changes are justified and that the documentation provides enough information for users to adapt to these changes.

• 177-179: The changelog entries here document more API breaking changes. It is important to ensure that these changes are communicated clearly and that the linked pull requests provide sufficient information for users to understand and adapt to the changes.

• 182-186: The "CLI Breaking Changes" section documents changes to the command-line interface, which can significantly impact users who interact with the application through the CLI. It is important to ensure that these changes are necessary and that they are communicated effectively to the users.

• 189-191: The "State Machine Breaking" section documents changes that affect the state machine's behavior. These are critical changes that can impact the application's core functionality, and it is essential to ensure that they are well-documented and justified.

• 230-237: The features listed here are significant additions to the codebase. It is important to ensure that they are implemented correctly and that the linked pull requests provide detailed information about the features.

• 241-251: The improvements listed in this section enhance the existing functionality. It is important to verify that these improvements are reflected in the code and that they align with the project's goals.

• 257-262: The improvements listed here should be verified against the code changes to ensure they are accurately represented and that the linked pull requests provide the necessary context.

• 305-307: The "State Machine Breaking" section here documents significant changes to the state machine. It is crucial to ensure that these changes are necessary, correctly implemented, and communicated to the users.

• 376-377: The removal of methods from the gov keeper and functions from the gov types are significant changes that should be clearly documented and communicated to the users, ensuring they understand how to adapt to these changes.

• 465-467: The "Client Breaking Changes" section documents changes that affect the client-side of the application. It is important to ensure that these changes are necessary and that they are communicated effectively to the users.

• 495-497: The CLI command changes listed here are significant and should be verified against the code changes to ensure they are accurately represented and that the linked pull requests provide the necessary context.

• 502-513: The "Bug Fixes" section documents important fixes to the codebase. It is crucial to ensure that these fixes are correctly implemented and that the linked pull requests provide detailed information about the fixes.

• 520-525: The bug fixes listed here should be verified against the code changes to ensure they are accurately represented and that the linked pull requests provide the necessary context.

• 539-541: The deprecation of the delegator_address field in MsgCreateValidator is a significant change that should be clearly documented and communicated to the users, ensuring they understand how to adapt to this change.

• 913-920: The EOL notice for the v0.46.x line is important for users to be aware of. It is crucial to ensure that users are informed about the end-of-life status of this version line and that they are encouraged to upgrade to a supported version.

Makefile (4)

• 269-273: The update to the test-sim-custom-genesis-fast target correctly changes the genesis file path and adds the -SigverifyTx=false flag.

• 283-286: The update to the test-sim-custom-genesis-multi-seed target correctly changes the genesis file path and adds the -SigverifyTx=false flag.

• 365-365: The golangci_version has been correctly updated to v1.55.0.

• 410-410: The CMT_URL has been correctly updated to https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cometbft/cometbft/v0.38.0/proto/tendermint.

README.md (1)

• 37-39: The updated warning message and note about the Go version reflect the changes mentioned in the summary. The language used in the warning message now suggests a less stable state of the Cosmos SDK, and the note emphasizes the necessity of using the latest maintained Go version.

RELEASE_PROCESS.md (4)

• 29-40: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [29-47]

The summary mentions the removal of the deploy-docs.yml workflow, but this is not reflected in the provided hunks. Please verify if this change is included elsewhere in the file or in another part of the PR.

• 85-86: The updates to the support timeline and bugfix-only rule for the 0.47 and 0.50 major releases are correctly reflected in the hunks.

• 241-247: The clarification regarding the release process for modules that do not depend on the Cosmos SDK, with a specific exception for Store v1, is accurately reflected in the hunks.

• 32-37: The summary does not mention the modifications made to test.yml and build.yml workflows, which are present in the hunks. Please verify if these changes are intended and if they should be documented in the summary.

UPGRADING.md (8)

• 101-107: The changes correctly reflect the deprecation of the params module and the introduction of the x/protocolpool module, as mentioned in the user-provided summary.

• 433-484: The changes to the TxConfig interface and the introduction of the new sign_mode_textual are correctly documented and align with the user-provided summary.

• 61-98: The changes to the module imports, where modules like auth, authz, bank, distribution, group, gov, mint, slashing, and staking are now spun out into their own go.mod files and imported using the cosmossdk.io domain, are correctly documented and align with the user-provided summary.

• 800-806: The deprecation of the params module is correctly documented, aligning with the user-provided summary.

• 105-107: The introduction of the new x/protocolpool module is correctly documented, aligning with the user-provided summary.

• 434-484: The changes to the TxConfig interface are correctly documented, aligning with the user-provided summary.

• 436-443: The introduction of the new sign mode is correctly documented, aligning with the user-provided summary.

• 802-806: The deprecation of the params module is correctly documented, aligning with the user-provided summary.

api/cosmos/accounts/testing/rotation/v1/partial.pulsar.go (8)

• 1584-1593: The MsgInit struct has a field PubKeyBytes which is exported and contains public key bytes. Ensure that there are no security implications of this field being publicly accessible, especially if it's used in a context where the public key should remain confidential.

• 1656-1657: The MsgRotatePubKey struct has a field NewPubKeyBytes which is exported and contains new public key bytes. Similar to the MsgInit struct, ensure that there are no security implications of this field being publicly accessible.

• 266-290: The ProtoMethods function for MsgInit includes a size method that calculates the size of the message for marshaling purposes. Ensure that the size calculation accounts for all fields, including any newly added fields in the future, to prevent issues with incomplete message encoding.

• 292-328: The ProtoMethods function for MsgInit includes a marshal method. Verify that the marshaling process correctly handles all fields, especially if new fields are added in the future, to ensure complete and correct data serialization.

• 330-425: The ProtoMethods function for MsgInit includes an unmarshal method. It's important to verify that the unmarshaling process correctly handles all fields and that any changes to the message structure are compatible with the expected wire format.

• 1044-1067: The ProtoMethods function for MsgRotatePubKey includes a size method. As with MsgInit, ensure that the size calculation is accurate and accounts for all fields to prevent issues with incomplete message encoding.

• 1070-1106: The ProtoMethods function for MsgRotatePubKey includes a marshal method. Verify that the marshaling process correctly handles all fields and that any changes to the message structure are compatible with the expected wire format.

• 1108-1203: The ProtoMethods function for MsgRotatePubKey includes an unmarshal method. It's important to verify that the unmarshaling process correctly handles all fields and that any changes to the message structure are compatible with the expected wire format.

api/cosmos/accounts/v1/account_abstraction.pulsar.go (29)

• 1-14: The import block is well-organized and follows Go conventions.

• 16-65: The _UserOperation_5_list and _UserOperation_7_list types and their methods are correctly implemented to satisfy the protoreflect.List interface.

• 130-140: Initialization of global variables in the init function is correct and follows Go best practices for setup of protobuf descriptors.

• 143-200: The fastReflection_UserOperation type and its methods are correctly implemented to provide efficient reflection-based operations on UserOperation messages.

• 202-255: The Range method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly iterates over the fields of the UserOperation message.

• 258-293: The Has method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly reports whether a field is populated.

• 295-324: The Clear method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly clears the fields of the UserOperation message.

• 327-371: The Get method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly retrieves the value for a field.

• 373-411: The Set method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly stores the value for a field.

• 413-455: The Mutable method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly returns a mutable reference to a composite type.

• 457-486: The NewField method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly returns a new value that is assignable to the field.

• 488-497: The WhichOneof method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly reports which field within the oneof is populated.

• 499-515: The GetUnknown and SetUnknown methods for fastReflection_UserOperation are correctly implemented to handle unknown fields.

• 517-527: The IsValid method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation correctly reports the validity of the message.

• 529-984: The ProtoMethods implementation for fastReflection_UserOperation provides optional fast reflection-based implementations of various operations.

• 986-1035: The _UserOperationResponse_3_list and _UserOperationResponse_5_list types and their methods are correctly implemented to satisfy the protoreflect.List interface.

• 1098-1106: Initialization of global variables in the init function is correct and follows Go best practices for setup of protobuf descriptors.

• 1109-1166: The fastReflection_UserOperationResponse type and its methods are correctly implemented to provide efficient reflection-based operations on UserOperationResponse messages.

• 1168-1210: The Range method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly iterates over the fields of the UserOperationResponse message.

• 1212-1243: The Has method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly reports whether a field is populated.

• 1245-1271: The Clear method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly clears the fields of the UserOperationResponse message.

• 1273-1311: The Get method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly retrieves the value for a field.

• 1313-1347: The Set method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly stores the value for a field.

• 1349-1387: The Mutable method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly returns a mutable reference to a composite type.

• 1389-1414: The NewField method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly returns a new value that is assignable to the field.

• 1416-1425: The WhichOneof method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly reports which field within the oneof is populated.

• 1427-1443: The GetUnknown and SetUnknown methods for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse are correctly implemented to handle unknown fields.

• 1445-1455: The IsValid method implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse correctly reports the validity of the message.

• 1457-1823: The ProtoMethods implementation for fastReflection_UserOperationResponse provides optional fast reflection-based implementations of various operations.

api/cosmos/accounts/v1/tx.pulsar.go (2)

• 2024-3074: The addition of MsgExecuteBundle and MsgExecuteBundleResponse message types with operations and responses fields respectively, is consistent with the summary provided.

• 3368-3370: The file descriptor variable File_cosmos_accounts_v1_tx_proto is part of the generated protobuf code and is used by the protobuf runtime.

api/cosmos/auth/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (2)

• 1302-1305: The byte value at line 1302 has been correctly updated from 0x22, 0xe6, 0x01 to 0x22, 0xd6, 0x01 as mentioned in the summary.

• 1314-1317: The byte value at line 1317 has been correctly updated from 0x3a, 0x2b, 0xba, 0xc0, 0x96, 0xda, 0x01, 0x25 to 0x3a, 0x1b, 0xba, 0xc0, 0x96, 0xda, 0x01, 0x15 as mentioned in the summary.

api/cosmos/authz/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1)

• 418-425: The changes in this hunk are related to the generated code comments and do not reflect any modifications to byte values or fields within the Module struct as mentioned in the summary. This discrepancy should be noted, and the summary should be updated to accurately reflect the changes made in the code.

api/cosmos/autocli/v1/options.pulsar.go (5)

• 1712-1715: The addition of the GovProposal field to the RpcCommandOptions struct is correctly implemented and used within the Range method.

• 1730-1733: The FlagOptions map field in RpcCommandOptions is correctly defined and used.

• 1734-1734: The PositionalArgs field in RpcCommandOptions is correctly defined and used.

• 1870-1873: The Skip field in RpcCommandOptions is correctly defined and used.

• 1874-1879: The GovProposal field in RpcCommandOptions is correctly defined and used.

api/cosmos/counter/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1)

• 1-579: The summary mentions the addition of new fields to the Module message in various packages, including MaxTitleLen, MaxSummaryLen, MaxProposalTitleLen, MaxProposalSummaryLen, and MinDepositRatio. However, these fields are not present in the provided hunk for the Module struct in api/cosmos/counter/module/v1/module.pulsar.go. Please verify if these fields should be included or if the summary is incorrect.

api/cosmos/counter/v1/query.pulsar.go (8)

• 1-1: The file is auto-generated from a protobuf definition and should not be manually edited. Ensure that any changes are made in the corresponding .proto files and re-generate this file as needed.

• 788-793: The QueryGetCountRequest message type is defined without any fields. Confirm that this is intentional and that no additional data is required for the count query.

• 815-821: The QueryGetCountResponse message includes a single field TotalCount. Ensure that this field is sufficient for the response and that no additional information is needed.

• 88-236: The methods Range, Has, Clear, Get, Set, Mutable, NewField, WhichOneof, GetUnknown, SetUnknown, IsValid, and ProtoMethods are auto-generated to fulfill the protoreflect.Message interface and should be correct if generated properly.

• 244-368: The ProtoMethods method provides custom implementations for marshaling, unmarshaling, and size calculation of the protobuf messages. Ensure that these implementations are correct and efficient.

• 19-22: The init function initializes the message descriptors from the protobuf file. Confirm that the protobuf definitions are correct and that the descriptors are being initialized as expected.

• 788-793: The QueryGetCountRequest struct includes internal fields for state management, caching, and handling unknown fields. Confirm that these fields are necessary and correctly implemented.

• 815-821: The QueryGetCountResponse struct includes an internal field for the total count along with state management, caching, and handling unknown fields. Confirm that these fields are necessary and correctly implemented.

api/cosmos/counter/v1/tx.pulsar.go (1)

• 1-1106: The summary does not mention updates to .go files generated from .proto files, yet the provided hunk is from a .go file that appears to be generated from a .proto file. Please ensure that the summary accurately reflects all changes made in the PR, including generated files.

api/cosmos/distribution/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1)

• 564-593: The summary mentions alterations to field names and types within the protobuf message definitions, but the hunk provided only shows changes to the protobuf raw descriptor bytes, which are automatically generated and do not typically require manual review. It's important to ensure that any changes to the protobuf definitions are reflected in the corresponding .proto files and that they are compatible with any systems that consume these messages.

api/cosmos/distribution/v1beta1/distribution.pulsar.go (15)

• 3706-3767: The implementation of the _FeePool_2_list type and its methods appears to be correct and follows the pattern of protobuf list handling in Go. The methods are implemented to manipulate a list of DecCoin pointers, which is consistent with protobuf's handling of repeated fields.

• 3841-3846: The check for len(x.DecimalPool) != 0 before invoking the callback function f with the fd_FeePool_decimal_pool field descriptor and the value of the DecimalPool list is correct. It ensures that the callback is only called if the DecimalPool is not empty.

• 3864-3865: The case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" in the switch correctly checks for the presence of elements in the DecimalPool field by checking its length.

• 3884-3885: The case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" correctly sets the DecimalPool field to nil, which is a common way to clear a slice in Go.

• 3908-3913: The case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" correctly handles the case where DecimalPool is empty by returning a new instance of _FeePool_2_list with an empty list. This is consistent with the protobuf pattern for handling repeated fields.

• 3938-3941: The assignment of the DecimalPool field from the list value in the case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" is correct. It uses type assertion to convert the protoreflect.List to the concrete type _FeePool_2_list and then assigns the underlying list to the DecimalPool field.

• 3968-3973: The case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" correctly initializes the DecimalPool field if it is nil before returning a protoreflect.Value of the list. This ensures that the DecimalPool field is always initialized when accessed.

• 3990-3992: The case statement for "cosmos.distribution.v1beta1.FeePool.decimal_pool" correctly creates a new list of DecCoin and returns a protoreflect.Value of the list. This is consistent with the protobuf pattern for handling repeated fields.

• 4068-4073: The loop that iterates over x.DecimalPool and calculates the size for serialization is correct. It uses the runtime.Sov function to compute the size of the varint that represents the length of the encoded message, which is a standard protobuf operation.

• 4103-4117: The loop that marshals the DecimalPool field in reverse order for serialization is correct. It checks for errors during marshaling and returns early if an error occurs, which is good error handling practice.

• 4218-4251: The unmarshaling logic for the DecimalPool field is correct. It checks the wire type, reads the message length, and handles potential errors such as integer overflow, unexpected EOF, and invalid length. It then appends a new DecCoin to the DecimalPool and unmarshals the data into it.

• 7066-7074: The FeePool struct has been updated to include the DecimalPool field, which is a slice of DecCoin pointers. The comment indicates that the CommunityPool field is deprecated and should not be used, which is a good practice for communicating changes in the API.

• 7097-7110: The getter methods for CommunityPool and DecimalPool are implemented correctly. They check for nil before returning the field value, which prevents potential nil pointer dereferences.

• 7456-7548: The protobuf descriptor changes reflect the addition of the DecimalPool field to the FeePool message. The type names and field numbers are consistent with protobuf's syntax and conventions.

• 7587-7594: The type name references in the init function are correct and follow the protobuf pattern for linking message fields to their respective types.

api/cosmos/feegrant/v1beta1/tx.pulsar.go (4)

• 1775-2552: The summary does not mention updates to protobuf definitions, but the provided hunk includes changes to protobuf files. Please ensure the summary accurately reflects all significant changes in the PR.

• 1775-2552: The addition of MsgPruneAllowances and MsgPruneAllowancesResponse message types introduces new functionality for pruning expired fee allowances. This should be reflected in the summary.

• 2727-2734: The MsgPruneAllowances message type correctly includes a pruner field, following the established pattern for message types in this file.

• 2764-2771: The MsgPruneAllowancesResponse message type is empty, which is consistent with other response types that do not return data.

api/cosmos/gov/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (14)

• 17-31: The addition of field descriptors for MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen in the init function is correct and aligns with the summary.

• 107-121: The Range method has been correctly updated to handle the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 138-147: The Has method correctly checks for the presence of the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 162-171: The Clear method has been updated to clear the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen when called.

• 188-199: The Get method has been correctly updated to retrieve the values of the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 218-227: The Set method has been updated to set the values for the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 246-255: The Mutable method correctly panics for the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen as they are not mutable composite types.

• 267-276: The NewField method has been updated to return a new default value for the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 347-358: The size function within ProtoMethods has been updated to account for the size of the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 382-397: The marshal function within ProtoMethods has been updated to include the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 504-547: The unmarshal function within ProtoMethods has been updated to correctly unmarshal the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen.

• 601-610: The Module struct has been updated to include the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen with appropriate protobuf tags and comments.

• 643-658: Getter methods for the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen have been added to the Module struct.

• 665-694: The protobuf file descriptor has been updated to include the new fields MaxTitleLen and MaxSummaryLen in the Module message.

api/cosmos/gov/v1/gov.pulsar.go (15)

• 5550-5550: The addition of the MinDepositRatio field descriptor is consistent with the changes described in the summary.

• 5571-5571: The initialization of the MinDepositRatio field descriptor in the init function is correct and follows the pattern established by other fields.

• 5729-5734: The conditional check and assignment for MinDepositRatio in the Range method are implemented correctly, following the established pattern for other fields.

• 5780-5781: The Has method's case for MinDepositRatio is correctly checking for a non-empty string, which is the expected behavior for a string field.

• 5828-5829: The Clear method's case for MinDepositRatio correctly sets the field to an empty string, which is the expected behavior for clearing a string field.

• 5897-5899: The Get method's case for MinDepositRatio correctly retrieves the value of the field as a protoreflect.ValueOfString.

• 5954-5955: The Set method's case for MinDepositRatio correctly assigns the value to the field, ensuring type safety by asserting the interface to a string.

• 6023-6024: The Mutable method's case for MinDepositRatio correctly panics, as the field is not mutable, which is consistent with the behavior of other non-mutable fields.

• 6073-6074: The New method's case for MinDepositRatio correctly returns a default empty string value, which is the expected behavior for a string field.

• 6205-6208: The size calculation for MinDepositRatio in the Size method is correct, accounting for the length of the string and the size of the varint encoding.

• 6238-6246: The marshaling code for MinDepositRatio in the MarshalToSizedBuffer method is correct, ensuring the string is copied into the buffer and preceded by the appropriate tag and length.

• 6909-6940: The unmarshaling code for MinDepositRatio is correct, handling the wire type check, length calculation, and assignment to the field.

• 7728-7733: The comment for MinDepositRatio provides a clear explanation of the field's purpose and default behavior, which is helpful for understanding the context of the field.

• 7861-7866: The getter method GetMinDepositRatio is implemented correctly, providing a safe way to access the MinDepositRatio field with a default value if the receiver is nil.

• 8064-8106: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [8006-8103]

The protobuf field tags and options for MinDepositRatio are correctly defined, with the field number, type, and JSON tag all set appropriately.

api/cosmos/group/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (13)

• 17-34: The initialization of field descriptors for the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen in the Module struct is correctly implemented.

• 110-125: The Range method has been correctly updated to handle the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 141-150: The Has method correctly checks for the presence of the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 165-174: The Clear method correctly resets the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen to their zero values.

• 191-202: The Get method correctly retrieves the values for the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 221-230: The Set method correctly assigns values to the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 252-261: The Mutable method correctly throws an error when attempting to mutate the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen, as they are not mutable.

• 274-283: The NewField method correctly provides a way to create new instances of the fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 354-365: The ProtoMethods size function has been correctly updated to account for the size of the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 389-404: The ProtoMethods marshal function has been correctly updated to include the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 522-565: The ProtoMethods unmarshal function has been correctly updated to parse the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen.

• 617-634: The Module struct has been correctly updated with the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen, including appropriate protobuf field tags.

• 668-683: Getter methods for the new fields MaxProposalTitleLen and MaxProposalSummaryLen have been correctly implemented in the Module struct.

api/cosmos/mint/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (1)

• 563-587: The summary mentions changes in byte values and string lengths within the variable declaration at line 563, but the hunk provided does not show any changes to variable declarations. It only shows the raw descriptor data for the protobuf file. Please ensure that the summary accurately reflects the changes made in the code.

api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/query.pulsar.go (6)

• 871-880: The initialization of md_QueryUnclaimedBudgetRequest should be checked to ensure that the message descriptor is correctly retrieved and that the message name matches the expected protobuf message.

• 2170-2178: The QueryUnclaimedBudgetRequest message includes an Address field. It's important to ensure that this field is properly validated wherever it's used to prevent any security issues related to invalid or malicious addresses.

• 2214-2227: The QueryUnclaimedBudgetResponse message includes several fields related to budgeting. It's crucial to ensure that the business logic that populates these fields correctly handles the calculations and time-based operations to prevent any logical errors in budget tracking.

• 2401-2411: The message types and Go types are correctly defined and mapped to the corresponding protobuf messages. This ensures that the generated code will correctly handle the serialization and deserialization of these messages.

• 2412-2428: The dependency indexes are correctly set up, which ensures that the generated code will have the correct import paths and type references for the protobuf messages.

• 2485-2494: The TypeBuilder is used to construct the file descriptor for the protobuf file. This is part of the generated code and should not be modified manually. It's important to ensure that the generation process is correctly configured to produce the expected output.

api/cosmos/protocolpool/v1/types.pulsar.go (2)

• 1-1: The file is auto-generated by protoc-gen-go-pulsar and should not be manually edited.

• 944-969: The Budget message type is correctly defined with fields for recipient address, total budget, claimed amount, start time, next claim from, tranches, tranches left, and period.

api/cosmos/slashing/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (2)

• 492-502: The summary mentions alterations to the byte sequence for module_proto_rawDesc, but the provided hunk does not show any changes to a byte sequence. Please verify if the summary is accurate or if the relevant changes are not included in the provided hunk.

• 492-502: The changes in the provided hunk are related to comments and package declarations, which typically do not contain substantive changes.

api/cosmos/staking/module/v1/module.pulsar.go (2)

• 773-777: The summary indicates changes in byte values at line 773 and a longer sequence at line 784, but these changes are not present in the provided hunks. Please verify the accuracy of the summary or the provided hunks.

• 773-777: The comments in the protobuf file descriptor have been updated, which seems to reflect a change in the structure or content of the Module message. Please ensure that these changes are intentional and correctly represent the desired state of the protobuf definitions.

api/cosmos/staking/v1beta1/staking.pulsar.go (2)

• 15947-15948: The addition of the fee field to ConsPubKeyRotationHistory should be accompanied by updates to any logic that creates or processes this message to ensure the new field is handled correctly.

• 16006-16014: The new ValAddrsOfRotatedConsKeys message should be integrated into the system. Ensure that any logic related to key rotation accounts for this new message and that it is stored and retrieved correctly in the state.

[coderabbitai]

The specified Go version 1.21 does not align with the official Go release versions. Please verify if this is a typo or if a specific versioning system is being used.

[coderabbitai]

The specified Go version 1.21 is not valid. Go versions follow the pattern 1.x where x is a single digit. Please update to a valid Go version, such as 1.21.x if that was the intended version.

-          go-version: "1.21"
+          go-version: "1.21.x" # Replace with the correct version if different

---

Committable suggestion

❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	go-version: "1.21"
	go-version: "1.21.x" # Replace with the correct version if different

[coderabbitai]

There seems to be a discrepancy in the path for the x/tx module's go.mod and go.sum files. The destination path should be consistent with other modules and have a dot prefix.

- COPY x/tx/go.mod x/tx/go.sum /x/tx/
+ COPY x/tx/go.mod x/tx/go.sum ./x/tx/

---

Committable suggestion

❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	COPY x/tx/go.mod x/tx/go.sum /x/tx/
	COPY x/tx/go.mod x/tx/go.sum ./x/tx/

[coderabbitai]

The import of the cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/msg/v1 package is unused and should be removed to keep the code clean.

-	_ "cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/msg/v1"

---

Committable suggestion

❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	package accountsv1
	import (
	_ "cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/msg/v1"
	fmt "fmt"
	runtime "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto/runtime"
	protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
	package accountsv1
	import (
	fmt "fmt"
	runtime "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto/runtime"
	protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"

[coderabbitai]

The import of fmt is unused and should be removed to keep the code clean and maintainable.

- import (
-   ...
-   fmt "fmt"
-   ...
- )

---

Committable suggestion

❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	import (
	v1beta1 "cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/base/v1beta1"
	fmt "fmt"
	_ "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto"
	runtime "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto/runtime"
	_ "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/gogoproto"
	_ "google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api/annotations"
	protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
	protoiface "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoiface"
	protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
	durationpb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/durationpb"
	timestamppb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/timestamppb"
	io "io"
	reflect "reflect"
	sync "sync"
	import (
	v1beta1 "cosmossdk.io/api/cosmos/base/v1beta1"
	_ "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto"
	runtime "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-proto/runtime"
	_ "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/gogoproto"
	_ "google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api/annotations"
	protoreflect "google.golang.org/protobuf/reflect/protoreflect"
	protoiface "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoiface"
	protoimpl "google.golang.org/protobuf/runtime/protoimpl"
	durationpb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/durationpb"
	timestamppb "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/timestamppb"
	io "io"
	reflect "reflect"
	sync "sync"

[coderabbitai]

The closing braces for the ProtoMethods function seem to be missing a comment or annotation that typically accompanies generated code to indicate the end of a method. This is not a functional issue but could be a minor inconsistency in the code generation template.