Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ascii art #16

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024
Merged

add ascii art #16

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

grizz
Copy link
Member

@grizz grizz commented Jan 25, 2024

Add ascii representations of the mermaid docs. They are hand made and I'm not sure it makes sense to diagram more than the Auth loop part.

It does look like we can have the svg rendered for the html views [0], using our github actions template [1]. Should we look at adding both or leave it as is for the first version?

[0] https://authors.ietf.org/diagrams
[1] https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc/wiki/SVG

@grizz grizz requested a review from jramseyer January 25, 2024 20:14
@@ -93,6 +93,62 @@ Using the token bearer model ([RFC6750](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rf
# Example Request Flow
For a diagram, please see: https://github.com/bgp/autopeer/blob/main/README.md#sequence-diagram

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As per
https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc/blob/master/examples/stupid-s.mkd
You should "box" this diagram with

~~~~~~~~~~

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ichabond oh, good catch, thanks. I guess I should do a local install and check how the rendering works.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can check the build artifacts here, too: https://github.com/bgp/draft-ietf-peering-api/actions/runs/7659907136

Let's see if it works with the ~~~?

@jramseyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks nice to me! Thanks for putting it together. Fine by me to merge once it renders correctly in the artifact.

@jramseyer
Copy link
Collaborator

resolved merge conflicts

@jramseyer jramseyer merged commit 9ffff4d into main Jan 29, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants