Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing some bugs and active development #28

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vishnumahamkali
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Bug causing problems with accessing equilibrator accessions

@vishnumahamkali
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@timmccubbin, FYI

@carrascomj carrascomj mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@carrascomj carrascomj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have left some comments, but in general it has solved some of the issues that I had when reloading a model with CPLEX (which I think was a cobrapy/optlang issue), so it looks good, thanks!

@@ -261,6 +262,60 @@ def calculate_transport_charge(self):
{key: sum(val) for key, val in n_proton.items()},
)

def update_variable_bounds(self):
"""Updating the method from cobra to update the flux bounds in cplex_interface. Currently not doing it for gurobi_interface as I don't have a licence to test this"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a Gurobi license, could give it a try and make a PR to this branch or in a follow-up after this is merged. Or would you rather stop support for gurobi? My use case for gurobi so far has been that the constraint relaxation is more flexible, but I have managed to get CPLEX to do what I want. Not sure if the "Debugging" part of the docs would still work, although I don't think that gurobi's computeIIS function takes the quadratic constraint into account anyways.


logs_dir = cwd + os.sep + "logs"
if not os.path.exists(logs_dir):
os.makedirs(logs_dir)


def variability(model_variability, variable_list=None):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have been using this branch with CPLEX for a couple of days, including the variability, and it's been working great so far.

@@ -31,7 +28,7 @@
R = 8.31e-3 # "kJ / mol / K"
FARADAY = 96.485 # "kJ / mol"
Vmax = 1000
K = 1e8
K = 1e6
default_T = 298.15 # , "K")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have opened an issue about this #29.

equilibrator-api==0.3.2b7
component-contribution==0.3.2b4
equilibrator-cache==0.3.2b2
equilibrator-api
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to pin it, since the different equilibrator packages usually need to coordinated. This version set works for me with this branch:

equilibrator-api==0.6.0
equilibrator-cache==0.6.0
component-contribution==0.6.0

I think stating only equilibrator-api>=0.6.0 and letting pip do the dependency resolution might also be fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants