impr(web): ai assistant feature flag #426
Conversation
* chore: create correct sitemaps * chore: create correct SEO * chore: update sitemap * chore: update metadata * chore: update sitemap in category * chore: support target ES6 typescript * refactor: code update, according to coderabbitai
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR implements a feature flag for the AI Assistant component. The implementation adds a new environment variable to control the visibility of the AI Assistant feature and includes a conditional rendering check in the component. Class diagram for AI Assistant feature flagclassDiagram
class AiAssistant {
+nanoid() String
+render() void
}
class appConfig {
+features: Features
}
class Features {
+learn: Boolean
+i18n: Boolean
+auction: Boolean
+aiAssistant: Boolean
}
AiAssistant --> appConfig: uses
appConfig --> Features: has
note for AiAssistant "Conditional rendering based on aiAssistant feature flag"
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the environment configuration and the AI assistant functionality within the application. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @AndlerRL - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please add NEXT_PUBLIC_FEAT_AI_ASSISTANT to the .env.example file to help other developers understand the required environment variables.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/.env.example (2)
30-30: Update default value to align with production stateSince the AI assistant is currently disabled in production due to reported issues, consider setting the default value to "false" in the example file to match the current production state.
-NEXT_PUBLIC_FEAT_AI_ASSISTANT="true" +NEXT_PUBLIC_FEAT_AI_ASSISTANT="false"
32-39: Consider moving sensitive API keys to a separate sectionFor better security practices, consider grouping sensitive API keys (OPENAI_API_KEY, HUGGINGFACE_API_KEY) in a separate "Sensitive Keys" section with appropriate comments about secure handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/web/.env.example(1 hunks)apps/web/components/ai-assistant/index.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/lib/config.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/lib/config.ts (1)
38-38: LGTM: Feature flag implementation is consistent
The implementation follows the established pattern for feature flags and correctly converts the environment variable to boolean.
apps/web/components/ai-assistant/index.tsx (1)
10-12: LGTM: Clean feature flag implementation
The early return pattern is well implemented and efficiently prevents rendering when the feature is disabled.
Let's verify there are no side effects from the null return:
✅ Verification successful
Feature flag implementation is safe to use
The component is dynamically imported with ssr: false and used in the layout component. Since it's client-side only and the parent layout doesn't depend on its render output, returning null when the feature is disabled won't cause any side effects.
- The component is imported using
dynamicwithssr: falseinapps/web/app/(routes)/[lang]/layout.tsx - It's rendered alongside other components like
DynamicVConsole,GoogleAnalytics, andAnalytics - No direct dependencies on its render output were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any parent components that might depend on AiAssistant's render output
rg -l "AiAssistant" | xargs rg -A 5 "<AiAssistant"
Length of output: 50
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for AiAssistant usage patterns
rg "AiAssistant" -A 5
# Also search for potential imports of AiAssistant
rg "import.*AiAssistant"
Length of output: 1413
gaboesquivel
force-pushed
the
develop
branch
from
2358f2f to
6b559eb
Compare
Summary by Sourcery
Implement a feature flag for the AI Assistant component to control its availability based on configuration settings.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes