Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renames config file to sim file #130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

sr-gi
Copy link
Member

@sr-gi sr-gi commented Oct 5, 2023

Currently we are using the term config file for the file that contains the simulation details. This is kind of fine for now, but it will get messy down the line when we want to start storing default values for the CLI parameters in a config file. Furthermore, we are requiring the config file to be passed, but --config is required.

This both renames config to sim, and makes the parameter positional instead of named.

Copy link
Contributor

@carlaKC carlaKC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tACK, naming nit but I don't have much better.

sim-lib/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Currently we are using the term config file for the file that contains the
simulation details. This is kind of fine for now, but it will get messy down the
line when we want to start storing default values for the CLI parameters in a config
file. Furthermore, we are requiring the config file to be passed, but `--config` is
required.

This both renames config to sim, and makes the parameter positional instead of named.
@sr-gi sr-gi force-pushed the 20231005-simfile branch from 9add2c9 to 4db438c Compare October 5, 2023 20:25
@sr-gi sr-gi merged commit 390039d into bitcoin-dev-project:main Oct 5, 2023
2 checks passed
@okjodom okjodom mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants