Architectural Decision Records #1592
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@thunderbiscuit I'm curious if you have input on what has been the impact, if any, of the new persistence APIs on bdk-ffi |
evanlinjin
reviewed
Sep 12, 2024
ValuedMammal
force-pushed
the
doc/adr
branch
from
219982e
to
d913b62
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Opening this up as a record of past decisions. The template is inspired by the one used by uniffi. Whether or not we decide to add these to the repo, it's an opportunity to learn, discuss, and collab when it comes to design and architecture.
I'm currently working on summarizing the design choices behind
PersistedWalletthat was introduced in beta.1 and later refined. Another recent suggestion was to document how we're thinking about single vs multiple descriptor wallets. Feedback welcome.See #1309