Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[deps]: Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v6.14.0 #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 6.13.1 -> 6.14.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 6.13.1 -> 6.14.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: add no-unsafe-unary-minus, prefer-destructuring to disable-type-checked (#​8038) (431cd15)
  • eslint-plugin: correct message for no-unsafe-unary-minus (#​7998) (705370a)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [explicit-function-return-type] add support for typed class property definitions (#​8027) (bff47d7)
  • eslint-plugin: [require-await] allow yielding Promise in async generators (#​8003) (4c3e704)

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.2 (2023-12-04)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.1 (2023-11-28)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v6.13.2

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.2 (2023-12-04)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

6.13.1 (2023-11-28)

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v6.13.2

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2023 07:12
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from bc109d0 to 6cce8f9 Compare December 18, 2023 16:20
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 6cce8f9 to 43973d2 Compare December 18, 2023 16:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@Thomas-Avery Thomas-Avery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dev dependency upgrades only. LGTM

@Thomas-Avery Thomas-Avery merged commit d29ca26 into main Dec 18, 2023
5 checks passed
@Thomas-Avery Thomas-Avery deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 18, 2023 17:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant