Create hint design #306
Create hint design #306
Conversation
thomastepi
commented
Oct 19, 2024
thomastepi
commented
- Replaced the static preview with previewComponent prop.
- created hint preview component.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (1)
Action Required: Address Issues with
DefaultPageTemplatePropsThe current implementation of
DefaultPageTemplateinHintDefaultPage.jsxhas some areas that need attention:
deleteItemProp:
- The
deleteItemprop is currently an empty function. This should be properly implemented to handle item deletions effectively.
getItemsProp:
- The
getItemsprop is returning mock data (mockHints). Ensure this is connected to the actual data source before moving to production.
navigateToCreateFunction:
- Verify that the
navigateToCreatefunction correctly routes to the intended creation page to prevent navigation issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
23-35: Yo, this DefaultPageTemplate's got more props than a Hollywood movie set!Listen up, my dude! That DefaultPageTemplate you're usin'? It's like a Swiss Army knife of components, but we gotta make sure all them props are doin' work!
- That
deleteItemprop is emptier than my wallet after a shopping spree. We gotta implement that for real, ya feel me?- The
getItemsprop is still spittin' out that mock data. We need to hook it up to the real deal when we're ready to drop this in production.- Make sure that
navigateToCreatefunction is takin' us to the right spot. We don't wanna end up lost in the sauce!Let's make sure we're usin' this DefaultPageTemplate correctly elsewhere:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, let's see how we're usin' this DefaultPageTemplate in other spots rg --type javascript "DefaultPageTemplate" -A 10 -g '!HintDefaultPage.jsx'Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected rg command to search for DefaultPageTemplate in JavaScript files rg --type js "DefaultPageTemplate" -A 10 -g '!HintDefaultPage.jsx'Length of output: 8254
frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css (1)
32-32: Bruh, this formatting's cleaner than Eminem's rhymes!Yo, peep this. We just dropped a fresh line for that .popupContentContainer. It ain't much, but it's honest work. Makes the code look slicker than a rapper's new kicks. Keep it up, homie!
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx (1)
35-47: This button's got more style than Slim Shady, but it's making me dizzy!Your conditional rendering is tighter than Eminem's rhymes, and using that custom Button component? That's the real Slim Shady right there!
But yo, those inline styles are making me feel like I'm about to lose myself. Let's clean it up like we're cleaning out our closet:
const buttonStyles = { backgroundColor: buttonBackgroundColor, color: buttonTextColor, margin: "1rem", }; <div className="preview-button-container"> {previewBtnText && ( <Button style={buttonStyles} text={previewBtnText} /> )} </div>This way, your styles are organized better than Eminem's lyric notebook. Keep it up, and your code will be dropping beats smoother than Dr. Dre's production!
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (2)
64-71: Yo, this preview's got a whole new flavor!Aight, check it out. We've tossed out the old recipe and cooked up this fresh
HintComponentin ourpreviewComponentprop. It's like we've gone from microwave meals to gourmet pasta, you feel me?But yo, this prop's looking kinda chunky. How about we slim it down a bit? Here's a little remix for ya:
previewComponent={ <HintComponent previewBtnText={leftContentFormData.actionButtonText} headerBackgroundColor={headerBackgroundColor} headerColor={headerColor} textColor={textColor} buttonBackgroundColor={buttonBackgroundColor} buttonTextColor={buttonTextColor} /> }This way, it's easier to digest, like breaking up a long spaghetti noodle, you know?
Line range hint
1-85: Yo, this component's got a whole new vibe!Listen up, homie. You've taken this
CreateHintPageand turned it into a five-star dining experience. We've got that newHintComponentcookin', and it's serving up a storm with all those custom props. It's like we've gone from mom's spaghetti to a gourmet pasta bar!But yo, I'm thinking we could spice it up even more in the future. Maybe we could whip up a custom hook to manage all those color states? It'd be like having a master chef handle all the ingredients, you feel me? Something like:
const [hintStyles, setHintStyles] = useHintStyles();This way, we keep our main component recipe clean and let the custom hook do the heavy lifting. Just a thought for the next time we're in the kitchen, aight?
Overall, though, this PR's looking tastier than a plate of perfectly al dente spaghetti. You've nailed it, chef!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (4 hunks)
- frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css (1 hunks)
- frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css (2 hunks)
- frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (3 hunks)
- frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx
[error] 33-33: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (3)
20-21: Aight, this component's structure is tighter than mom's spaghetti!Yo, check it out! This
HintDefaultPagecomponent is lookin' fresh with that arrow function syntax. And thatuseNavigatehook? It's gonna help us bounce around the app like we're in a mosh pit! Keep it up, homie!
Line range hint
37-37: This export's smoother than a fresh jar of Skippy!Yo, that default export is on point! It's gonna make importin' this component in other files easier than stealin' candy from a baby. Keep it up, you're killin' it!
Line range hint
1-19: Yo, dawg! This mock data's got me sweatin' like I just ran a marathon!Listen up, homie! That mock data you got there? It's cool for testin' and all, but it's like bringin' a water gun to a fire fight in production. We gotta make sure we're fetchin' real data from the backend when we're ready to drop this beat for real, ya feel me?
Let's check if we're usin' this mock data anywhere else in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Mock Data Usage Isolated Successfully
The mock data
const mockHintsis only used withinHintDefaultPage.jsx. This ensures that testing data doesn't inadvertently affect other parts of the application. Make sure to replace mock data with real data from the backend before moving to production.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Yo, let's hunt down any other instances of this mock data, aight? rg --type javascript "const mockHints = \[" -g '!HintDefaultPage.jsx'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Alright, let's give this another shot with the right file type rg --type js "const mockHints = \[" -g '!HintDefaultPage.jsx'Length of output: 63
frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css (1)
29-29: Yo, this padding's lit, fam!Aight, check it. This new padding's gonna make that h3 pop like mom's spaghetti. It's all about that horizontal space, you feel me? Readability's gonna be off the charts now.
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx (1)
1-15: Yo, these imports are fire, dawg!The imports and component declaration are on point, like mom's spaghetti. You've got React, DOMPurify for that sweet security, and a custom Button component. Props destructuring is clean, making the code easier to digest than Eminem's lyrics.
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (2)
6-6: Yo, this import's legit!Aight, homie, you've brought in that fresh
HintComponent. It's like you're cookin' up some new spaghetti code, but in a good way, you feel me? This import's gonna make our hint game strong.
20-20: Yo, we just bleached that header!Listen up, dawg. We just switched up the header background from off-white to straight-up white. It's like we're cleaning up mom's spaghetti stains, you know what I'm sayin'? But for real, make sure this change don't mess with our design flow.
Can you double-check with the design team if this white-out is what they wanted? We don't want our UI looking like it's covered in flour, feel me?
| <div | ||
| className="preview-content" | ||
| style={{ color: textColor }} | ||
| dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(htmlContent) }} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Whoa, this content's got me shook, like mom's spaghetti!
You're using DOMPurify to sanitize that HTML content, which is dope for keeping those XSS attacks at bay. But yo, that dangerouslySetInnerHTML is making my knees weak. Even though you're sanitizing, it's still a bit sketch.
Consider using a markdown parser or a rich text editor component instead. It'll make your code safer than Eminem's secret stash of rhymes.
Also, that inline style for text color? It's cool, but it's making my arms heavy. Let's move it to a separate object or use CSS classes for better maintainability.
Here's a quick refactor to make it pop:
const contentStyles = {
color: textColor,
};
<div
className="preview-content"
style={contentStyles}
>
{/* Use a markdown parser or rich text editor component here */}
</div>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 33-33: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
|
Hi @thomastepi - any updates here? |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (19)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css (1)
11-14: Consider adding min-height for better content accommodation 🤔While the overflow-y: auto handles scrolling nicely, setting a min-height could prevent the editor from becoming too cramped with minimal content.
.ProseMirror { height: 7.5rem; + min-height: 4rem; padding: 0 25px; overflow-y: auto; }frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx (2)
3-3: Heads up about this context initialization, fam!The context is initialized without a default value. While this works, it's better to provide an initial value to help with type checking and avoid potential undefined issues.
Consider adding a default value:
-const GuideTemplateContext = createContext(); +const GuideTemplateContext = createContext({ + isOpen: false, + openDialog: () => {}, + closeDialog: () => {} +});
7-18: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this provider's looking steady! 💪The provider implementation is clean, but there's room for performance optimization.
Consider memoizing the context value to prevent unnecessary re-renders:
export const GuideTemplateProvider = ({ children }) => { const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false); const openDialog = () => setIsOpen(true); const closeDialog = () => setIsOpen(false); + const value = React.useMemo( + () => ({ isOpen, openDialog, closeDialog }), + [isOpen] + ); + return ( - <GuideTemplateContext.Provider value={{ isOpen, openDialog, closeDialog }}> + <GuideTemplateContext.Provider value={value}> {children} </GuideTemplateContext.Provider> ); };frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (2)
18-25: These props be dropping like they're hot! 🎤The DefaultPageTemplate props look solid, but let's make it bulletproof with PropTypes validation.
Add this at the top of your file:
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types';And at the bottom:
+DefaultPageTemplate.propTypes = { + getItems: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + deleteItem: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + navigateToCreate: PropTypes.func.isRequired, + itemType: PropTypes.object.isRequired, + itemTypeInfo: PropTypes.object.isRequired, + getItemDetails: PropTypes.func.isRequired +};
17-27: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this structure's ready! 💪The Fragment wrapper with both components looks clean. Consider adding a brief comment explaining this dual-component pattern for future maintainers.
return ( + // Renders both the default page template and create popup dialog <>frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx (1)
22-25: These inline styles are all over the place like loose papers in 8 Mile! 📝Let's clean up these styles and move them to CSS modules or styled-components.
Create a new file
HintComponent.styles.js:export const getHeaderStyles = (backgroundColor, color) => ({ backgroundColor, color, }); export const getButtonStyles = (backgroundColor, color) => ({ backgroundColor, color, margin: '1rem', });Then import and use these style generators:
+ import { getHeaderStyles, getButtonStyles } from './HintComponent.styles'; - style={{ - backgroundColor: headerBackgroundColor, - color: headerColor, - }} + style={getHeaderStyles(headerBackgroundColor, headerColor)} - style={{ - backgroundColor: buttonBackgroundColor, - color: buttonTextColor, - margin: "1rem", - }} + style={getButtonStyles(buttonBackgroundColor, buttonTextColor)}Also applies to: 38-43
frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.module.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-91: Yo, these styles could use some organization!The SCSS structure could benefit from some organization using partial files and better separation of concerns. Consider:
- Breaking out reusable variables and mixins
- Separating component-specific styles
- Using BEM methodology more consistently
Here's a suggested structure:
// _variables.scss $header-padding: 20px; $content-padding: 15px 25px; // _mixins.scss @mixin menu-button-base { border: none; background: transparent; cursor: pointer; padding: 13px 20px; position: relative; } // Then import these in your component SCSSfrontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
21-22: Don't lose yourself! Add some validation! 🎤Consider adding input validation to prevent potential XSS attacks or invalid header content.
const handleHeaderChange = (e) => { + const value = e.target.value; + if (value.length > 100) return; // Prevent extremely long headers + if (/<[^>]*>/g.test(value)) return; // Prevent HTML injection setHeader(e.target.value); };frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.jsx (3)
23-26: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's make this size validation more robust!While the size validation works, it could be more maintainable and type-safe.
Consider this improvement:
-const validSizes = ["small", "medium", "large"]; -const sizeClass = validSizes.includes(popupSize.toLowerCase()) - ? styles[popupSize.toLowerCase()] - : ""; +const VALID_SIZES = Object.freeze({ + SMALL: 'small', + MEDIUM: 'medium', + LARGE: 'large' +}); +const sizeClass = Object.values(VALID_SIZES) + .includes(popupSize?.toLowerCase()) + ? styles[popupSize.toLowerCase()] + : "";
54-62: Knees weak, but these styles are strong! 💪The header styling is well-structured, but the hardcoded values could be moved to constants.
Consider extracting these values:
+const HEADER_STYLES = { + CLOSE_ICON: { + color: "#98A2B3", + fontSize: "20px", + cursor: "pointer" + }, + TITLE_MARGIN: "5px" +}; - <h3 style={{ marginLeft: "5px" }}>{header}</h3> + <h3 style={{ marginLeft: HEADER_STYLES.TITLE_MARGIN }}>{header}</h3> <CloseOutlinedIcon - style={{ color: "#98A2B3", fontSize: "20px", cursor: "pointer" }} + style={HEADER_STYLES.CLOSE_ICON} onClick={handleClose} />
78-78: That margin's ready, but we need consistency! 🎯The margin style uses quotes while other styles use template literals.
For consistency with other styles in the file:
- margin: "1rem", + margin: `1rem`,frontend/src/App.jsx (1)
Yo, we've got some inconsistencies in the hint creation flow! 🍝
The codebase shows mixed implementation where hint creation is handled both through dialog and direct routing:
HintDefaultPageuses dialog approach (openDialogand embedded<CreateHintPage />)- But
/hint/createroute still exists in:
Dashboard.jsx- navigates to "/hint/create"HintDefaultPage.jsx- hasnavigateToCreatefunction with '/hint/create'This dual approach could cause confusion and inconsistent user experience. Either the dialog-based or route-based approach should be used consistently, not both.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-64: Verify the removal of CreateHintPage route 🤔The removal of the
/hint/createroute aligns with the PR objectives of integrating hint creation into dialog-based navigation. Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that CreateHintPage is now used with useDialog # and not referenced in other routing configurations # Test 1: Check for any remaining route definitions using CreateHintPage echo "Checking for remaining route definitions..." rg -l "CreateHintPage.*element" --type jsx # Test 2: Verify the new dialog-based usage echo "Verifying dialog-based usage..." rg "useDialog.*CreateHintPage" --type jsxLength of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try without specifying file type and use more generic patterns echo "Checking for CreateHintPage route definitions..." rg -l "CreateHintPage.*Route" echo "Checking for CreateHintPage imports..." rg -l "import.*CreateHintPage" echo "Checking for dialog-based usage..." rg "useDialog.*CreateHintPage" # Let's also check for any remaining references to hint/create path echo "Checking for hint/create path references..." rg "hint/create" # Check for CreateHintPage component existence echo "Looking for CreateHintPage component file..." fd CreateHintPageLength of output: 869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of HintDefaultPage to see how CreateHintPage is used echo "Checking HintDefaultPage implementation..." cat frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx # Also check the CreateHintPage component echo "Checking CreateHintPage implementation..." cat frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx # Check Dashboard implementation for hint/create navigation echo "Checking Dashboard implementation..." cat frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsxLength of output: 8989
frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx (2)
69-89: Mom's spaghetti: Let's optimize these TextField props!The current slotProps configuration is quite nested and could be simplified. Also, consider extracting style constants.
- Extract style constants:
const STYLES = { formHelper: { marginLeft: 0, paddingTop: 1, }, input: (inputHeight) => ({ height: inputHeight, paddingTop: 0, paddingBottom: 0, }), };
- Simplify the chips logic:
- ...(chips && - chips.length > 0 && { - startAdornment: <ChipAdornment chips={chips} />, - }), + startAdornment: chips?.length ? <ChipAdornment chips={chips} /> : startAdornment,
- Consider memoizing the slotProps object to prevent unnecessary re-renders:
const getSlotProps = React.useMemo( () => ({ formHelperText: { style: STYLES.formHelper, }, input: { style: STYLES.input(inputHeight), startAdornment: chips?.length ? <ChipAdornment chips={chips} /> : startAdornment, endAdornment, }, }), [inputHeight, chips, startAdornment, endAdornment] );
Line range hint
96-124: Yo, we're missing some PropTypes here!The following props are used but not defined in PropTypes:
labelSubTextautoFocusdisabledstyleAdd these to the PropTypes definition:
CustomTextField.propTypes = { + labelSubText: PropTypes.string, + autoFocus: PropTypes.bool, + disabled: PropTypes.bool, + style: PropTypes.object, // ... existing PropTypes };frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx (3)
109-124: Yo, these props are dropping harder than mom's spaghetti! 🍝Consider extracting the preview component to reduce prop drilling and improve readability. The current implementation passes many props through multiple levels.
Here's a cleaner approach:
- previewComponent={({header, content}) => ( - <PopupComponent - header={header} - content={content} - setHeader={setHeader} - setContent={setContent} - previewBtnText={actionButtonText} - headerBackgroundColor={headerBackgroundColor} - headerColor={headerColor} - textColor={textColor} - buttonBackgroundColor={buttonBackgroundColor} - buttonTextColor={buttonTextColor} - popupSize={popupSize} - /> - )} + previewComponent={PopupPreview}And create a new component:
const PopupPreview = ({ header, content }) => { const { setHeader, setContent, actionButtonText, headerBackgroundColor, headerColor, textColor, buttonBackgroundColor, buttonTextColor, popupSize, } = usePopupContext(); // Create a context for these props return ( <PopupComponent header={header} content={content} setHeader={setHeader} setContent={setContent} previewBtnText={actionButtonText} headerBackgroundColor={headerBackgroundColor} headerColor={headerColor} textColor={textColor} buttonBackgroundColor={buttonBackgroundColor} buttonTextColor={buttonTextColor} popupSize={popupSize} /> ); };
125-130: These styles be looking nervous, but on the surface they look calm and ready! 💅Consider extracting the inline styles to a separate styles object for better maintainability.
const editorStyles = { width: "100%", maxWidth: "700px", marginLeft: "2.5rem", marginTop: "1rem", }; // Then in your component: <RichTextEditor sx={editorStyles} />
108-132: Drop some memoization to capture this moment! 🎵The preview component function is being recreated on every render. Consider using useCallback to optimize performance.
const renderPreviewComponent = useCallback( ({ header, content }) => ( <PopupComponent header={header} content={content} // ... other props /> ), [actionButtonText, headerBackgroundColor, headerColor, textColor, buttonBackgroundColor, buttonTextColor, popupSize] ); // Then in your JSX: <RichTextEditor previewComponent={renderPreviewComponent} />frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx (2)
65-69: Consider closing the dialog instead of navigating away on "Cancel" click.On line 68, the "Cancel" button uses
navigate("/")to redirect to the root path. For consistency with the close icon, which invokescloseDialog, consider usingcloseDialoghere as well to simply close the dialog without navigating away.
45-45: Correct the typo in the comment.In line 45, the comment has a typo:
- {/* Content and Appereance buttons */} + {/* Content and Appearance buttons */}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
frontend/src/App.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx(5 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Tabs/EditorTabs.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Toolbar/EditorToolbar.css(0 hunks)frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/index.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/login/Login.module.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.module.scss(2 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Toolbar/EditorToolbar.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.css
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Tabs/EditorTabs.css
- frontend/src/scenes/login/Login.module.css
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css
- frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css
- frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
- frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx
[error] 33-33: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22.x)
frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx
[failure] 20-20: src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx > CreatePopupPage component > handles onSave and successful popup creation
TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'isOpen' of 'useDialog(...)' as it is undefined.
❯ GuideTemplate src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx:20:11
❯ renderWithHooks node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:15486:18
❯ mountIndeterminateComponent node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:20103:13
❯ beginWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:21626:16
❯ beginWork$1 node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:27465:14
❯ performUnitOfWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26599:12
❯ workLoopSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26505:5
❯ renderRootSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26473:7
❯ recoverFromConcurrentError node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25889:20
❯ performConcurrentWorkOnRoot node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25789:22
[failure] 20-20: src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx > CreatePopupPage component > handles onSave and failed popup creation
TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'isOpen' of 'useDialog(...)' as it is undefined.
❯ GuideTemplate src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx:20:11
❯ renderWithHooks node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:15486:18
❯ mountIndeterminateComponent node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:20103:13
❯ beginWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:21626:16
❯ beginWork$1 node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:27465:14
❯ performUnitOfWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26599:12
❯ workLoopSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26505:5
❯ renderRootSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26473:7
❯ recoverFromConcurrentError node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25889:20
❯ performConcurrentWorkOnRoot node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25789:22
[failure] 20-20: src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx > CreatePopupPage component > initializes form fields correctly
TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'isOpen' of 'useDialog(...)' as it is undefined.
❯ GuideTemplate src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx:20:11
❯ renderWithHooks node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:15486:18
❯ mountIndeterminateComponent node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:20103:13
❯ beginWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:21626:16
❯ beginWork$1 node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:27465:14
❯ performUnitOfWork node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26599:12
❯ workLoopSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26505:5
❯ renderRootSync node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:26473:7
❯ recoverFromConcurrentError node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25889:20
❯ performConcurrentWorkOnRoot node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:25789:22
🔇 Additional comments (14)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css (1)
11-11: Yo! The switch to rem units is fire, but let's verify content handling! 🔥
The change from fixed pixels to relative units (7.5rem) is a solid improvement for responsive design. However, we should verify that:
- Content doesn't get cut off with longer text
- The editor remains usable across different viewport sizes
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, we're good here - the overflow's got our back! ✌️
Just checked the RichTextEditor.css and found overflow-y: auto already handling any content that might spill over. That's exactly what we need when the content gets too large for the 7.5rem container. The switch to rem units with proper overflow handling is actually a solid combo - it's responsive AND functional.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any height-related media queries or responsive adjustments
rg -g "*.css" "height.*@media"
# Look for potential overflow handling in related components
rg -g "*.css" "overflow|scroll" "./frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/"
Length of output: 190
frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx (2)
1-1: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
Clean and precise import statement including only the necessary React features.
1-18: Verify the provider's usage across the application! 🔍
Let's ensure this context provider is properly integrated where needed.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual implementation of these files to better understand the context usage.
Yo, the context provider's integration is clean and proper! 🍝
The GuideTemplateProvider is properly wrapped at the root level in index.jsx, serving the whole app with that sweet dialog context. The useDialog hook is being correctly consumed in:
- GuideTemplate.jsx: Using
isOpenandcloseDialogfor dialog control - HintDefaultPage.jsx: Using
openDialogfor hint management - PopupDefaultPage.jsx: Using
openDialogfor popup handling
Everything's flowing smooth like mom's spaghetti! 🔥
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GuideTemplateProvider usage
echo "Checking GuideTemplateProvider usage..."
rg -l "GuideTemplateProvider"
# Search for useDialog hook usage
echo "\nChecking useDialog hook usage..."
rg -l "useDialog"
# Look for potential spots where we might need the dialog context
echo "\nChecking potential dialog-related components..."
rg -l "Dialog|Modal|Popup"
Length of output: 2862
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check GuideTemplateProvider implementation in index.jsx
echo "Checking index.jsx implementation..."
rg -A 5 "GuideTemplateProvider" frontend/src/index.jsx
# Check how useDialog is used in the components
echo "\nChecking useDialog usage in GuideTemplate.jsx..."
rg -A 5 "useDialog" frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx
echo "\nChecking useDialog usage in HintDefaultPage.jsx..."
rg -A 5 "useDialog" frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx
echo "\nChecking useDialog usage in PopupDefaultPage.jsx..."
rg -A 5 "useDialog" frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx
Length of output: 2173
frontend/src/index.jsx (2)
9-9: Yo, this import's clean!
The GuideTemplateProvider import is properly structured and follows project conventions.
16-21: Yo dawg, we need to verify this Toast placement!
Moving Toast inside the Router component could affect its behavior. Let's verify this change won't cause issues with:
- Portal rendering
- Z-index stacking
- Routing context dependencies
Let's check if there are any portal-related implementations in the Toast component:
Consider keeping Toast outside the Router if it doesn't explicitly need routing context, as this is a common pattern for global UI elements.
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (1)
3-3: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports for CreatePopupPage and useDialog are properly structured and align perfectly with the component's needs.
Also applies to: 6-6
frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.module.scss (1)
49-49: Yo! Let's verify this spacing change, fam!
The reduction in margin-top from 2rem to 1rem might affect the vertical rhythm. Make sure this aligns with our design system's spacing guidelines and maintains visual harmony with surrounding elements.
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, this margin change is straight fire! 🔥
The 1rem margin-top is actually the standard spacing used across the codebase! Looking at the evidence:
- Most components use 1rem margin-top consistently (PopupComponent, RichTextEditor, Logo, ParagraphCSS, etc.)
- Only ProgressStepsMain uses 2rem, but that's a different component with different spacing needs
- The codebase has a px-to-rem function in globals.scss, showing there's a systematic approach to spacing
The change from 2rem to 1rem actually brings this component in line with the rest of the application's spacing patterns. It's not losing the beat, it's finding its rhythm!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other margin-top declarations to verify consistency
rg "margin-top:\s+[12]rem" --type scss
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with the correct file extension for SCSS files
rg "margin-top:\s+[12]rem" --type css
# Also search for other margin declarations to understand spacing patterns
rg "margin.*:\s+[12]rem" --type css
# Let's also check for any design system or spacing variables
rg "spacing|margin|rem" frontend/src/styles
Length of output: 3034
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (5)
1-2: Yo, these imports are clean as mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The removal of unused imports and addition of PropTypes shows good housekeeping.
15-17: Vomit on his sweater already... I mean, state management! 🤢
Consider accepting state handlers as props to allow parent components to control the editor's state.
19-19: Mom's spaghetti approved! 🍝
Good job implementing the Preview component assignment as suggested.
74-77: These PropTypes are fire! 🔥
Excellent implementation of PropTypes with the correct elementType validation.
62-62:
Snap back to reality! Props don't match! 🎵
The Preview component receives content prop but the state variable is named htmlContent.
- <Preview header={header} content={htmlContent} />
+ <Preview header={header} htmlContent={htmlContent} />Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.jsx (1)
19-19: Yo dawg, that trailing comma is straight fire! 🔥
The addition of the trailing comma after isReal follows best practices for version control and makes future additions cleaner.
frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx (1)
4-5: Yo dawg, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The relative imports are properly structured and the new PopupComponent import aligns perfectly with the component's needs.
frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Fixed overflow and removed the grey area at the bottom. For large popup sizes, should the dialog maintain a fixed width with horizontal scroll or expand/shrink based on content width? |
Let's expand/shrink the popup based on the content width. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (2)
41-43: We need some error handling here, my G! 🛡️The content update callback could fail if
setContentis undefined or if the HTML extraction fails.Consider adding error handling:
onUpdate: ({ editor }) => { + try { setContent(editor.getHTML()); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to update content:', error); + } },
14-20: Let's drop some docs here, homie! 📚The component could benefit from JSDoc documentation to explain its purpose and props usage.
Consider adding documentation:
+/** + * A rich text editor component with preview capabilities. + * @param {Object} props + * @param {Object} props.sx - Style overrides for the container + * @param {React.ElementType} props.previewComponent - Component to render the preview + * @param {string} props.header - Header text + * @param {Function} props.setHeader - Header update callback + * @param {Function} props.setContent - Content update callback + */ const RichTextEditor = ({ sx = {}, previewComponent, header, setHeader, setContent, }) => {frontend/src/tests/components/textFieldComponent/CustomTextField.test.jsx (1)
70-70: Yo, this height check improvement is straight fire! 🔥The change to check the wrapper's height instead of the input directly is more reliable, as Material-UI applies styles to the
.MuiOutlinedInput-rootwrapper.Consider adding a comment to explain why we're targeting the wrapper:
+ // Height is applied to the MUI wrapper rather than the input directly expect(screen.getByRole('textbox').closest('.MuiOutlinedInput-root').style.height).toBe('50px');frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx (4)
1-9: Yo dawg, let's organize these imports to keep it fresh!Group related imports together for better maintainability:
- React and core dependencies
- Material-UI components
- Local components and styles
- Hooks and utilities
import { React } from "react"; import PropTypes from "prop-types"; +import { useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; +import classNames from "classnames"; + import CloseOutlinedIcon from "@mui/icons-material/CloseOutlined"; import { Dialog } from "@mui/material"; + import styles from "./GuideTemplate.module.scss"; -import classNames from "classnames"; import Button from "../../components/Button/Button"; -import { useNavigate } from "react-router-dom"; import { useDialog } from "./GuideTemplateContext";
24-30: Clean up those commented props, they're making me nervous!Remove the commented-out props if they're not needed. If they're for future use, document why they're kept.
<Dialog open={isOpen} onClose={closeDialog} maxWidth="lg" - //fullWidth - //PaperProps={{ style: {} }} >
67-69: Navigation on cancel needs some love!Consider using
closeDialogbefore navigation to ensure the dialog closes properly.onClick={() => { + closeDialog(); navigate("/"); }}
81-87: Strengthen those PropTypes like your knees should be!Consider adding
.isRequiredto essential props and more specific PropTypes for structured data.GuideTemplate.propTypes = { - title: PropTypes.string, + title: PropTypes.string.isRequired, handleButtonClick: PropTypes.func, activeButton: PropTypes.number, leftContent: PropTypes.func, rightContent: PropTypes.func, leftAppearance: PropTypes.func, - onSave: PropTypes.func, + onSave: PropTypes.func.isRequired, };frontend/src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx (2)
Line range hint
113-166: Mom's spaghetti moment - let's tackle this TODO! 🍝The commented-out edit test is crucial for ensuring the popup editing functionality works correctly. This is especially important given the PR's focus on preview components.
Would you like me to help implement this test case? I can provide a complete implementation that:
- Tests the edit mode initialization
- Verifies preview component integration
- Validates form field population
Line range hint
99-107: Yo, these form field assertions looking kinda sus! 🤔The current form field assertions are checking for incorrect initial values:
'No action'and'https://'don't seem like valid default values for color fields- The assertion messages don't match what's being tested
Here's how to fix these assertions:
-const headerBackgroundColor = screen.getByDisplayValue('No action'); -const headerColor = screen.getByDisplayValue('https://'); +const headerBackgroundColor = screen.getByLabelText(/header background color/i); +const headerColor = screen.getByLabelText(/header color/i); -expect(headerBackgroundColor).not.toBeNull(); -expect(headerColor).not.toBeNull(); +expect(headerBackgroundColor).toHaveValue('#ffffff'); // Replace with actual default +expect(headerColor).toHaveValue('#000000'); // Replace with actual defaultfrontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (1)
Line range hint
22-26: Knees weak, arms heavy, but these color states are ready! 💪The default color scheme looks solid, but we could make this more maintainable.
Consider extracting these default values to a constants file:
+// Add to src/constants/theme.js +export const DEFAULT_HINT_COLORS = { + headerBackground: "#FFFFFF", + header: "#101828", + text: "#344054", + buttonBackground: "#7F56D9", + buttonText: "#FFFFFF" +}; -const [headerBackgroundColor, setHeaderBackgroundColor] = useState("#FFFFFF"); -const [headerColor, setHeaderColor] = useState("#101828"); +const [headerBackgroundColor, setHeaderBackgroundColor] = useState(DEFAULT_HINT_COLORS.headerBackground); +const [headerColor, setHeaderColor] = useState(DEFAULT_HINT_COLORS.header);frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx (5)
13-13: Yo dawg, let's add some PropTypes to keep it real!Consider adding PropTypes validation for the
autoOpenprop to make the component more robust and self-documenting.+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; const CreatePopupPage = ({autoOpen = false}) => { // ... component code ... }; + +CreatePopupPage.propTypes = { + autoOpen: PropTypes.bool +};
38-44: Mom's spaghetti moment: We can simplify this state logic!The
stablePopupSizestate and effect could be replaced with a derived value or simplified state update.-const [stablePopupSize, setStablePopupSize] = useState(''); - -useEffect(() => { - if (popupSize) { - setStablePopupSize(popupSize); - } -}, [popupSize]); +// Use this derived value instead +const stablePopupSize = popupSize || 'Small'; // or whatever default size you prefer
Line range hint
82-103: Knees weak, arms are heavy - let's validate before we save!The save function should validate required fields before submission to prevent invalid data.
const onSave = async () => { + // Validate required fields + if (!header.trim() || !content.trim()) { + toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, 'Header and content are required'); + return; + } + + if (actionButtonUrl !== 'https://' && !actionButtonUrl.match(/^https?:\/\/.+/)) { + toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, 'Please enter a valid URL'); + return; + } + const popupData = { // ... existing code ... };
140-145: There's vomit on his sweater already - these styles need cleanup!Extract inline styles to a separate styles object or CSS module for better maintainability.
+const richTextEditorStyles = { + width: "100%", + maxWidth: "700px", + marginLeft: "2.5rem", + marginTop: "1rem", +}; <RichTextEditor - sx={{ - width: "100%", - maxWidth: "700px", - marginLeft: "2.5rem", - marginTop: "1rem", - }} + sx={richTextEditorStyles} />
124-136: Optimize that preview like mom's spaghetti recipe!The preview component should be memoized to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
+const PreviewComponent = React.memo(({ header, content, ...props }) => ( + <PopupComponent + header={header} + content={content} + {...props} + /> +)); <RichTextEditor previewComponent={() => ( - <PopupComponent - header={header} - content={content} - previewBtnText={actionButtonText} - headerBackgroundColor={headerBackgroundColor} - headerColor={headerColor} - textColor={textColor} - buttonBackgroundColor={buttonBackgroundColor} - buttonTextColor={buttonTextColor} - popupSize={stablePopupSize} - /> + <PreviewComponent + previewBtnText={actionButtonText} + headerBackgroundColor={headerBackgroundColor} + headerColor={headerColor} + textColor={textColor} + buttonBackgroundColor={buttonBackgroundColor} + buttonTextColor={buttonTextColor} + popupSize={stablePopupSize} + /> )} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Tabs/EditorTabs.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.module.scss(2 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/tests/components/textFieldComponent/CustomTextField.test.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Tabs/EditorTabs.css
- frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.module.scss
- frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
25-27: Clean handler, fam! 👊
The header change handler is simple and effective.
frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx (1)
20-20: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's fix that useDialog error!
The build is failing because useDialog returns undefined. This needs to be wrapped in a GuideTemplateContext.Provider.
frontend/src/tests/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.test.jsx (1)
9-9: Yo, nice wrapper setup for providing context! 🔥
The GuideTemplateProvider wrapper is cleanly implemented and follows the testing best practices by providing necessary context. The composition with Router is on point!
Also applies to: 22-26
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (1)
4-4: Yo! These imports are straight fire! 🔥
The new imports enhance the component's capabilities:
HintComponentfor preview renderinguseLocationfor routinguseDialogfor dialog management
Also applies to: 10-11
|
|
||
| const HintPage = () => { | ||
| const navigate = useNavigate(); | ||
| const { closeDialog } = useDialog(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo, there's some spaghetti in this dialog flow! 🍝
Based on the code analysis, we've got multiple form states but no unsaved changes protection or confirmation dialogs. When users close that dialog, their changes will vanish faster than mom's spaghetti at dinner time!
- Add unsaved changes detection using the form states (header, content, colors, etc.)
- Implement a confirmation dialog when closing with unsaved changes
- Consider adding a "Cancel" button alongside close for better UX
🔗 Analysis chain
Mom's spaghetti moment: Dialog flow needs verification! 🍝
The switch from navigation to dialog closing looks good, but let's verify the user flow:
- Does closing the dialog handle unsaved changes?
- Is there a way back if closed accidentally?
Also applies to: 106-106
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for unsaved changes handling patterns
rg -l "confirmBeforeClose|unsavedChanges|beforeunload" --type js
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for dialog-related patterns in the component and its dependencies
rg -A 5 "useDialog|closeDialog|onClose" frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
# Also search for form-related patterns that might handle unsaved state
rg -A 5 "handleSubmit|formState|isDirty|isSubmitting" frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
# Look for any dialog components being used
ast-grep --pattern 'Dialog$_'
Length of output: 795
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any form state management or unsaved changes handling
rg -A 10 "const.*form.*=.*useForm|const.*=.*useState" frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
# Look for any confirmation or warning dialogs
rg -A 5 "confirm|warning|alert" frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
# Check if there's a back button or navigation handling
rg -A 5 "goBack|history|navigate" frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx
Length of output: 1375
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- In hint preview, these buttons on the bottom are over each other
- In create new popup content, I think the 'Editor' and 'preview' buttons are not used to calculate the modal size. That's why they don't fit the screen adn we get the grey area at the bottom
- Also after creating/editing a popup/hint the default page doesn't fetch the new popup/hint automatically to show it on the screen
|
I previously set the position of the 'Editor' and 'Preview' buttons to absolute. This was because, when you change the size of the popup or hint, I wanted those buttons to stay in place and not get pushed. You can change it if you want. Or @gorkem-bwl should be move them to the top of the right section instead of the bottom? |
I think it's good as is. When the size of the popup changes they should stay in place. |
|
Then maybe we can add a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupAppearance/PopupAppearance.module.scss (2)
16-16: Yo dawg, consider making this width responsive! 🎵The fixed width of 241px might not adapt well on smaller screens. Consider using relative units or media queries for better responsiveness.
- width: 241px; + width: min(241px, 100%); + @media (max-width: 480px) { + width: 100%; + }
16-19: Mom's spaghetti says: Document this specific width! 🍝The choice of 241px seems specific. Consider adding a comment explaining why this exact width was chosen, especially since it matches the width in HintLeftAppearance.css. This will help future developers understand the design decision.
.color{ display: flex; align-items: center; + // Matches width of HintLeftAppearance color selector for consistency width: 241px; > div { width: 100%; }frontend/src/components/ColorTextField/ColorTextField.module.scss (1)
16-18: Yo! Let's merge these selectors to avoid repetition, dawg! 🔥There's already a
.MuiOutlinedInput-rootselector above. We can combine these styles for cleaner code.Here's how to keep it fresh:
:global { .MuiOutlinedInput-root { + border-radius: 8px; + &:hover fieldset { border-color: var(--main-purple); } &.Mui-focused fieldset { border-color: var(--main-purple); } } - - .MuiOutlinedInput-root { - border-radius: 8px; - } }frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css (1)
22-31: That height calc is giving me anxiety, no cap!That
calc(100% - 20px)is pretty sus - it's making assumptions about the header height. Consider using flex-grow instead for more reliable content distribution..preview-content-container { color: var(--second-text-color); justify-content: space-between; display: flex; flex-direction: column; box-sizing: border-box; - height: calc(100% - 20px); + flex-grow: 1; padding: 0 2rem; font-size: 13px; }frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (1)
9-12: Ayy, let's add some PropTypes to keep it real! 💯The state management is clean, but we could make it even better with some type safety.
Consider adding PropTypes or TypeScript for better type safety:
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; const HintDefaultPage = () => { // ... existing code ... }; +HintDefaultPage.propTypes = { + setItemsUpdated: PropTypes.func, + isEdit: PropTypes.bool, + itemId: PropTypes.string +};frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (3)
9-12: Yo, let's make this state management as organized as mom's recipe book! 🍝Consider combining related states into a single object to reduce state management complexity:
-const [isEdit, setIsEdit] = useState(false); -const [itemId, setItemId] = useState(null); +const [editState, setEditState] = useState({ + isEdit: false, + itemId: null +});This would make state updates more atomic and reduce the chance of state inconsistencies.
14-24: These dialog handlers are cookin', but let's add some error catching! 🍝The handlers look clean, but consider wrapping the state updates in try-catch blocks to handle any potential state update errors:
const openEditPopupDialog = (id) => { + try { setIsEdit(true); setItemId(id); openDialog(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to open edit dialog:', error); + // Handle error appropriately + } };
33-49: Props are flowing like mom's spaghetti sauce! 🍝The component structure is clean, but we're passing quite a few props down the chain. Consider using React Context for managing the edit state and dialog visibility if these props are needed in deeper child components.
// Example Context implementation const PopupContext = React.createContext({ isEdit: false, itemId: null, setItemsUpdated: () => {}, });This would reduce prop drilling and make the component more maintainable.
frontend/package.json (1)
32-37: Knees weak, arms heavy - let's talk about that bundle size! 💪The addition of both markdown-related packages might impact the bundle size. Consider implementing code splitting if these features aren't needed on initial load:
// Example dynamic import const MarkdownComponent = React.lazy(() => import('./MarkdownComponent'));frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (2)
46-49: That onDestroy cleanup's got me nervous! 😰The onDestroy callback clears both content and header. This might be too aggressive - what if we're just temporarily unmounting the editor? Consider making this cleanup optional or handling it at a higher level.
onDestroy: () => { - setContent(""); - setHeader(""); + // Let parent component handle cleanup if needed },
67-67: That hardcoded width's making me lose myself! 🎤Instead of hardcoding
TextFieldWidth="100%", consider making it configurable through props or using thesxprop for consistency:-TextFieldWidth="100%" +TextFieldWidth={sx.textFieldWidth || "100%"}frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx (1)
Line range hint
12-17: Lose yourself in the refactor - the loading state needs cleanup!The component uses two state variables (
loadingandload) to manage loading states, which adds unnecessary complexity.Consider simplifying the loading state management:
- const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); - const [load, setLoad] = useState(true) + const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true); const handleDelete = async () => { try { await deleteItem(itemToDelete); setPopupOpen(false); - if(items.length > 1){ - setLoad(false); - } + setIsLoading(items.length <= 1); setItemDeleted(prevState => !prevState);frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (3)
14-14: Yo dawg, your props are looking kinda naked! 🎤Let's drop some PropTypes validation to keep these props from losing themselves:
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; const HintPage = ({ isEdit, itemId, setItemsUpdated }) => { // ... component code ... }; +HintPage.propTypes = { + isEdit: PropTypes.bool, + itemId: PropTypes.string, + setItemsUpdated: PropTypes.func.isRequired +}; +HintPage.defaultProps = { + isEdit: false, + itemId: null +};
Line range hint
89-120: Validation's weak, errors are heavy! 🎤The save function needs some input validation before we lose ourselves in invalid data:
const onSave = async () => { + // Validate required fields + const requiredFields = { + header: 'Header', + content: 'Content', + actionButtonUrl: 'Action Button URL' + }; + + const missingFields = Object.entries(requiredFields) + .filter(([key]) => !eval(key)?.trim()) + .map(([, label]) => label); + + if (missingFields.length) { + toastEmitter.emit( + TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, + `Required fields missing: ${missingFields.join(', ')}` + ); + return; + } const hintData = { // ... existing data };
130-135: These inline styles are heavy, we need to drop 'em! 🎵Extract these styles to a styled component or CSS module:
+const editorStyles = { + width: "400px", + maxWidth: "700px", + marginLeft: "2.5rem", + marginTop: "1rem" +}; <RichTextEditor - sx={{ - width: "400px", - maxWidth: "700px", - marginLeft: "2.5rem", - marginTop: "1rem", - }} + sx={editorStyles}frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx (3)
39-45: Mom's spaghetti moment: Why do we need stablePopupSize? 🍝The
stablePopupSizestate looks like a workaround for an emptypopupSize. We should handle this more elegantly.Consider setting a default value for
popupSizeinstead:-const [popupSize, setPopupSize] = useState('Small'); -const [stablePopupSize, setStablePopupSize] = useState(''); +const [popupSize, setPopupSize] = useState('Small'); -useEffect(() => { - if (popupSize) { - setStablePopupSize(popupSize); - } -}, [popupSize]);Then use
popupSize || 'Small'when passing toPopupComponent.
Line range hint
56-80: Knees weak, arms heavy: Error handling needs some love! 🍝The error handling in the fetch logic could be more specific to help with debugging.
Consider enhancing error handling:
} catch (error) { - emitToastError(error); + const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message + ? `Failed to fetch popup: ${error.response.data.message}` + : `Failed to fetch popup: ${error.message || 'Unknown error'}`; + emitToastError(errorMessage); + console.error('Fetch popup error:', error); }
127-151: He's nervous, but on the surface the styles look calm and ready! 🍝The hardcoded styles and dimensions should be moved to a theme or constants file for better maintainability.
Create a styles constant file:
// styles/editorStyles.js export const EDITOR_STYLES = { minWidth: "400px", maxWidth: "700px", marginLeft: "2.5rem", marginTop: "1rem" };Then import and use it:
-sx={{ - minWidth: "400px", - maxWidth: "700px", - marginLeft: "2.5rem", - marginTop: "1rem", -}} +sx={EDITOR_STYLES}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ColorTextField/ColorTextField.module.scss(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Toolbar/EditorToolbar.css(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextFieldStyles.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.jsx(4 hunks)frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css(3 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx(6 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupAppearance/PopupAppearance.module.scss(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance.css
- frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.css
- frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/Toolbar/EditorToolbar.css
- frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.jsx
- frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.jsx
- frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (12)
frontend/src/products/Hint/hintComponent.css (3)
14-20: Heads up on that padding, fam!
The padding on the header (2rem) should match the content container for that clean alignment. Looking good otherwise!
33-36: These paragraph styles are straight fire!
The line height and margin combo is on point for readability. Keep it as is!
38-46: Button styling's clean as mom's spaghetti!
The flex-end alignment and margin reset create a clean, professional look. No changes needed here!
frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (2)
1-7: Yo, these imports are straight fire! 🔥
The organization is clean and each import serves a clear purpose. The separation between internal components, templates, and services is on point!
32-48: Knees weak, arms heavy, but this render logic is steady! 🎯
The component composition looks clean, but let's verify the integration with DefaultPageTemplate.
✅ Verification successful
The previous pattern didn't work, so let's try a broader search to understand the component's structure and its imports. This will help us verify the integration properly. Mom's spaghetti won't stop us from getting to the bottom of this! 🍝
Found the component location! Now let's check its implementation and docs to verify the props interface. Knees still weak, but we're getting closer to the truth! 🍝
Yo, this integration is as clean as mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The props passed to DefaultPageTemplate in HintDefaultPage perfectly match the component's interface and requirements:
- All required props are present (getItems, deleteItem, navigateToCreate, itemType, itemTypeInfo, getItemDetails)
- Extra props (itemsUpdated, onEditItem) are properly handled in the component for edit functionality
- The component follows the same pattern as shown in the documentation example
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify DefaultPageTemplate prop interface
ast-grep --pattern 'const DefaultPageTemplate = ({ $$$props }) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find DefaultPageTemplate
rg -A 5 "DefaultPageTemplate" --type jsx
# Also search for its import
rg "import.*DefaultPageTemplate"
Length of output: 910
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the DefaultPageTemplate implementation
cat frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx
# And its documentation
cat frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/README.md
Length of output: 5821
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (1)
1-7: Yo, these imports are cleaner than mom's kitchen! 🍝
The switch from navigation to dialog-based interaction looks clean. The imports are now properly organized and the unnecessary navigation-related imports have been removed.
frontend/package.json (2)
37-37: Mom's spaghetti check for turndown! 🍜
The turndown package for HTML-to-Markdown conversion needs security validation:
Consider adding content sanitization if not already implemented elsewhere.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check how turndown is actually used in the codebase before making the final call.
Yo, the spaghetti's safe - turndown usage checks out! 🍝
The security scan shows no known vulnerabilities for turndown, and the usage is straightforward in both CreatePopupPage and CreateHintPage components. The package is only used for basic HTML-to-Markdown conversion of content from a rich text editor, with no direct user input processing. Since the content comes from a controlled RichTextEditor component, there's no need for additional sanitization at the turndown level.
frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx: Simple conversion of editor contentfrontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx: Same controlled usage pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify turndown's security status and usage patterns
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "turndown") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
# Search for sanitization usage with turndown
rg -l "turndown.*sanitize" || echo "No sanitization found - please verify content safety!"
Length of output: 431
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find files using turndown
rg -l "turndown"
# Check actual usage patterns
rg -A 5 "turndown"
# Look for any HTML processing or conversion logic
rg -A 5 "\.turndown\("
rg -A 5 "new TurndownService"
Length of output: 5070
32-32: Yo! Let's verify react-markdown's security and compatibility! 🍝
The addition of react-markdown for content rendering needs verification:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, react-markdown is lookin' clean and ready! 🍝
The package is solid as mom's spaghetti:
- Compatible with React 18.2.0 ✅
- Built-in URI sanitization through micromark-util-sanitize-uri ✅
- Used properly in PopupComponent and HintComponent ✅
- No security vulnerabilities found ✅
Keep it real though - make sure to test those markdown inputs thoroughly in your components, especially in PopupComponent.jsx and HintComponent.jsx. That's the sauce! 🔥
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities and React 18 compatibility
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "react-markdown") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
# Check bundle size impact
curl -s "https://bundlephobia.com/api/[email protected]" | jq '.gzip'
Length of output: 431
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check React compatibility and actual usage
# Search for react-markdown imports and usage
rg -A 3 "import.*react-markdown"
# Check package.json for React version
cat frontend/package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .peerDependencies.react'
# Look for any markdown-related components
fd -e tsx -e ts -e js -e jsx . | xargs rg -l "ReactMarkdown|markdown"
# Check if there's any sanitization or security measures
rg -A 3 "sanitize|allowDangerousHtml|remarkPlugins|rehypePlugins"
Length of output: 2252
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (2)
81-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
These styles got vomit on my sweater already! 🤢
The absolute positioning of EditorTabs with a hardcoded top value could break the layout on different screen sizes. Consider using a more flexible approach:
<EditorTabs
mode={mode}
setMode={setMode}
sx={{
- position: "absolute",
- top: "400px",
- left: 0,
+ position: "relative",
+ marginTop: "2rem",
+ width: "100%",
}}
/>Likely invalid or redundant comment.
15-20: Let's verify this integration's not spaghetti! 🍝
Let's ensure the component properly integrates with HintComponent and other consumers.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, this spaghetti's actually pretty well-organized! 🍝
The RichTextEditor component is cleanly integrated with both CreatePopupPage and CreateHintPage. Both parent components properly manage their state with useState hooks and pass the required header/content props correctly. The preview functionality is implemented consistently across both use cases.
- CreatePopupPage and CreateHintPage both maintain their own header/content state
- RichTextEditor receives and handles these props appropriately
- State management follows React best practices with no prop drilling or messy patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RichTextEditor integration with consumers
# Check for proper prop usage in consumers
echo "Checking RichTextEditor usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "<RichTextEditor"
# Verify preview component implementations
echo "Checking preview component implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ({ header, content }) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1227
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's dig deeper into the preview components and prop handling
# Check for preview component implementations
echo "Checking for preview components in popup and hints..."
rg -A 10 "const.*Component.*=.*\{.*\}.*=>" frontend/src/scenes/popup frontend/src/scenes/hints
# Check RichTextEditor implementation
echo "Checking RichTextEditor implementation..."
rg -A 15 "const RichTextEditor" frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx
# Look for header/content state management
echo "Checking header/content state management..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const [$_] = useState($$$)'
Length of output: 817
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# One last check to see how the preview components are used
# Check PopupComponent implementation
echo "Checking PopupComponent implementation..."
rg -A 10 "const PopupComponent" frontend/src/scenes/popup
# Check HintComponent implementation
echo "Checking HintComponent implementation..."
rg -A 10 "const HintComponent" frontend/src/scenes/hints
# Check where header and content are managed
echo "Checking state management in parent components..."
rg -A 5 "const \[(?:header|content)" frontend/src/scenes/
Length of output: 2990
frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx (2)
59-59: Straight fire! 🔥 The dependency array is on point!
Adding itemsUpdated to the dependency array ensures the component stays fresh with the latest data.
65-65: This edit callback is cleaner than mom's spaghetti! 🍝
The direct use of onEditItem simplifies the code flow. However, let's make sure all callers are ready for this change.
✅ Verification successful
Yo, this callback change is clean and ready to drop! 🎤
The search results show that navigateToCreate and onEditItem are properly handled across the codebase. The DefaultPageTemplate component receives both props, and the change aligns perfectly with how it's used in PopupDefaultPage and HintDefaultPage, which already use their own edit handlers (openEditPopupDialog and openEditHintDialog). No spaghetti code in sight!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct uses of navigateToCreate for editing
rg "navigateToCreate.*edit" --type js --type jsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct uses of navigateToCreate for editing, using ripgrep with js files
rg "navigateToCreate.*edit" -t js
# Also search for any usage of navigateToCreate function to understand the context
rg "navigateToCreate" -t js -A 3
# Let's also check for onEditItem prop usage
rg "onEditItem" -t js -A 2
Length of output: 5768
| @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ | |||
| &.Mui-focused fieldset { | |||
| border-color: var(--main-purple); | |||
| } | |||
| border-radius: 8px !important; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, that !important looking kinda sus! 🍝
Using !important to override styles can lead to specificity wars and make the codebase harder to maintain. Consider these alternatives:
-.textField .MuiOutlinedInput-root {
- border-radius: 8px !important;
-}
+/* Option 1: Use Material-UI's theme customization */
+const theme = createTheme({
+ components: {
+ MuiOutlinedInput: {
+ styleOverrides: {
+ root: {
+ borderRadius: 8,
+ },
+ },
+ },
+ },
+});
+
+/* Option 2: Increase specificity without !important */
+.textField .MuiOutlinedInput-root.MuiOutlinedInput-root {
+ border-radius: 8px;
+}Mom's spaghetti would be proud of a cleaner approach! 🍜
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const openEditHintDialog = (id) => { | ||
| setIsEdit(true); | ||
| setItemId(id); | ||
| openDialog(); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const openNewHintDialog = () => { | ||
| setIsEdit(false); | ||
| setItemId(null); | ||
| openDialog(); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's catch those errors! 🍝
The dialog handling functions look solid, but we should add some error handling to prevent any unexpected states.
Here's a suggested improvement:
const openEditHintDialog = (id) => {
+ try {
+ if (!id) throw new Error('Invalid hint ID');
setIsEdit(true);
setItemId(id);
openDialog();
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to open edit dialog:', error);
+ // Consider adding error notification here
+ }
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import toastEmitter, { TOAST_EMITTER_KEY } from '../../utils/toastEmitter'; | |||
| import './DefaultPageTemplate.css' | |||
| import { useAuth } from '../../services/authProvider'; | |||
|
|
|||
| const DefaultPageTemplate = ({ getItems, deleteItem, navigateToCreate, itemType, itemTypeInfo, getItemDetails }) => { | |||
| const DefaultPageTemplate = ({ getItems, deleteItem, navigateToCreate, itemType, itemTypeInfo, getItemDetails, itemsUpdated, onEditItem }) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo! PropTypes are missing for the new props, dawg!
The new props itemsUpdated and onEditItem need their PropTypes validation. Don't let those props be undefined when you need them the most!
Add these PropTypes to keep it real:
DefaultPageTemplate.propTypes = {
getItems: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
deleteItem: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
navigateToCreate: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
itemType: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
itemTypeInfo: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
getItemDetails: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
+ itemsUpdated: PropTypes.bool,
+ onEditItem: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const DefaultPageTemplate = ({ getItems, deleteItem, navigateToCreate, itemType, itemTypeInfo, getItemDetails, itemsUpdated, onEditItem }) => { | |
| DefaultPageTemplate.propTypes = { | |
| getItems: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| deleteItem: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| navigateToCreate: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| itemType: PropTypes.string.isRequired, | |
| itemTypeInfo: PropTypes.string.isRequired, | |
| getItemDetails: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| itemsUpdated: PropTypes.bool, | |
| onEditItem: PropTypes.func.isRequired, | |
| }; |
| if (isEdit) { | ||
| const fetchHintData = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const hintData = await getHintById(location.state?.id); | ||
| setHeaderBackgroundColor(hintData.headerBackgroundColor || '#F8F9F8'); | ||
| setHeaderColor(hintData.headerColor || '#101828'); | ||
| setTextColor(hintData.textColor || '#344054'); | ||
| setButtonBackgroundColor(hintData.buttonBackgroundColor || '#7F56D9'); | ||
| setButtonTextColor(hintData.buttonTextColor || '#FFFFFF'); | ||
| setHeader(hintData.header || ''); | ||
| setContent(hintData.hintContent || ''); | ||
| setActionButtonUrl(hintData.actionButtonUrl || 'https://'); | ||
| setActionButtonText(hintData.actionButtonText || ''); | ||
| setButtonAction(hintData.action || 'No action'); | ||
|
|
||
| const hintData = await getHintById(itemId); | ||
| setHeaderBackgroundColor(hintData.headerBackgroundColor || "#F8F9F8"); | ||
| setHeaderColor(hintData.headerColor || "#101828"); | ||
| setTextColor(hintData.textColor || "#344054"); | ||
| setButtonBackgroundColor(hintData.buttonBackgroundColor || "#7F56D9"); | ||
| setButtonTextColor(hintData.buttonTextColor || "#FFFFFF"); | ||
| setHeader(hintData.header || ""); | ||
| setContent(hintData.hintContent || ""); | ||
| setActionButtonUrl(hintData.actionButtonUrl || "https://"); | ||
| setActionButtonText(hintData.actionButtonText || ""); | ||
| setAction(hintData.action || "No action"); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| emitToastError(error); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| fetchHintData(); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [location.state]) | ||
| }, [isEdit, itemId]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
This error handling's making me nervous, but I keep on forgetting! 🎵
The error handling could use some love, and those setState calls are looking like mom's spaghetti:
- Add loading state to handle fetch status
- Batch state updates for better performance
- Add proper error boundaries
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
if (isEdit) {
const fetchHintData = async () => {
+ setIsLoading(true);
try {
const hintData = await getHintById(itemId);
- setHeaderBackgroundColor(hintData.headerBackgroundColor || "#F8F9F8");
- setHeaderColor(hintData.headerColor || "#101828");
- // ... more setState calls
+ const updates = {
+ headerBackgroundColor: hintData.headerBackgroundColor || "#F8F9F8",
+ headerColor: hintData.headerColor || "#101828",
+ // ... more properties
+ };
+ Object.entries(updates).forEach(([key, value]) => {
+ const setter = `set${key.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + key.slice(1)}`;
+ if (typeof window[setter] === 'function') window[setter](value);
+ });
} catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch hint data:', error);
emitToastError(error);
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
};
fetchHintData();
}
}, [isEdit, itemId]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! After you change the CreateBanner route like popup, and resolve the conflicts I think it is ready to merge.
Also @gorkem-bwl Should we set the minimum height of the popup to the maximum height of the content and appearance sections? Switching between the two could cause the popup height to change, which might be eye-straining.
Yep, that makes sense. Overall the design looks good otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (1)
195-206: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionStill dropping these preview component bombs! 💣
The preview component could benefit from memoization to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (2)
14-24: Yo, these dialog functions need some seasoning! 🍝The dialog management functions are looking tasty, but let's add some error handling sauce to make them more robust:
const openEditPopupDialog = (id) => { + if (!id) { + console.error('Invalid popup ID provided'); + return; + } setIsEdit(true); setItemId(id); openDialog(); };
26-31: This getPopupDetails recipe needs more ingredients! 🍝The popup details are looking a bit bland. Consider adding more flavor:
const getPopupDetails = (popup) => ({ title: `Popup ${popup.id}`, - text: popup.header, + text: `${popup.header} - ${popup.description || 'No description'}`, + lastModified: popup.updatedAt, + status: popup.isActive ? 'Active' : 'Inactive' });frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkAppearance.jsx (2)
46-47: Mom's spaghetti moment: Color defaults need consistency! 🍝The color defaults are scattered throughout the component. Consider extracting these into a constants object at the top of the file for better maintainability.
Here's how you could clean this up:
+ const DEFAULT_COLORS = { + HEADER_BG: "#F8F9F8", + LINK_FONT: "#344054", + ICON: "#7F56D9" + }; const LinkAppearance = () => { // ... existing code ... // Then use them like: - value={helper.headerBackgroundColor || "#F8F9F8"} + value={helper.headerBackgroundColor || DEFAULT_COLORS.HEADER_BG} // ... and so on for other color inputsAlso applies to: 60-60, 67-68, 88-89
Line range hint
13-16: Knees weak, arms heavy: This useEffect needs cleanup! 💪The
useEffecthook that focuses the header input doesn't have a cleanup function. While it might not cause issues in this case, it's good practice to handle cleanup, especially for DOM operations.Consider updating it like this:
useEffect(() => { - document.querySelector('#header').focus() + const headerElement = document.querySelector('#header'); + if (headerElement) { + headerElement.focus(); + } + return () => { + if (headerElement) { + headerElement.blur(); + } + }; }, [])frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.module.scss (1)
Line range hint
11-13: Mom's spaghetti moment: duplicate box-shadows! 🍝The component has two separate box-shadow declarations that could be combined for better maintainability.
Consider combining the shadows:
- box-shadow: 0px 8px 8px -4px var(--shadow-one); - box-shadow: 0px 20px 24px -4px var(--shadow-two); + box-shadow: 0px 8px 8px -4px var(--shadow-one), + 0px 20px 24px -4px var(--shadow-two);frontend/src/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.jsx (2)
94-95: There's vomit on his sweater already: Error handling needs love!The
setItemsUpdatedcall should be moved after all operations complete successfully, including the deletion of links.Consider moving the state update:
- setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState); closeDialog(); } catch (err) { emitToastError(buildToastError(err)); return null; } if (helperToEdit && deletedLinks.length) { await Promise.all( // ... existing code ); } if (newHelper) { + setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState); const toastMessage = helper.id
131-131: He's nervous, but on the surface he looks calm and ready: Add optional chaining!The title relies on
helperState.isEditwithout checking ifhelperStateexists first.Add optional chaining:
- title={helperState?.isEdit ? "Edit Helper Link" : "New Helper Link"} + title={helperState?.isEdit ?? false ? "Edit Helper Link" : "New Helper Link"}frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx (3)
6-13: Yo dawg, we need some prop validation up in here!The props refactoring is fire 🔥, but without PropTypes, we're living dangerously. Let's add some safety nets to catch those props before they drop!
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; const HintLeftContent = ({ actionButtonText, actionButtonUrl, action, targetElement, tooltipPlacement, updateHintStates, }) => { // ... component code ... }; +HintLeftContent.propTypes = { + actionButtonText: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + actionButtonUrl: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + action: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + targetElement: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + tooltipPlacement: PropTypes.string.isRequired, + updateHintStates: PropTypes.func.isRequired, +};
14-32: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's optimize these handlers!These handlers are looking clean, but they're getting recreated on every render like dropping fresh pasta in boiling water. Let's wrap them in useCallback to keep them as stable as mom's recipe! 🍝
+import React, { useCallback } from 'react'; - const handleActionButtonText = (event) => { + const handleActionButtonText = useCallback((event) => { updateHintStates("actionButtonText", event.target.value); - }; + }, [updateHintStates]); - const handleActionButtonUrl = (event) => { + const handleActionButtonUrl = useCallback((event) => { updateHintStates("actionButtonUrl", event.target.value); - }; + }, [updateHintStates]); // Apply similar changes to other handlers
36-41: These styles are making my knees weak! 🎵The inline styles are scattered like mom's spaghetti. Let's clean this up by moving them to your CSS file for better maintainability!
// In HintLeftContent.css +.hint-label { + margin-bottom: 0; + margin-top: 16px; +} + +.hint-label--with-bottom-margin { + margin-bottom: 8px; +} // In your component -<h2 className="hint-label" style={{ marginTop: "16px", marginBottom: "8px" }}> +<h2 className="hint-label hint-label--with-bottom-margin">Also applies to: 47-48, 72-74
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPage.module.scss (1)
26-26: Yo! That fixed width's making me nervous! 🍝Using a fixed width of 15rem might cause layout issues on different screen sizes. Consider using a responsive approach:
- width: 15rem; + width: clamp(15rem, 50%, 20rem);frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (1)
24-24: Clean up that commented code, dawg! 🧹Remove the commented out useDialog hook usage to keep the code clean.
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (2)
1-12: Yo! These imports are all over the place like mom's spaghetti! 🍝There's inconsistency in import paths - mixing
@componentsaliases with relative paths. Let's keep it consistent:-import RichTextEditor from "@components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor"; -import HintLeftContent from "@components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent"; -import HintLeftAppearance from "@components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance"; +import RichTextEditor from "../../components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor"; +import HintLeftContent from "../../components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent"; +import HintLeftAppearance from "../../components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftAppearance/HintLeftAppearance";
156-175: This reset effect's got vomit on its sweater already! 🍝The reset effect could be simplified and made more robust:
- Hardcoded path check is fragile
- Multiple state resets could be consolidated
Consider this improvement:
-if (!isOpen && location.pathname === "/hint") { +const shouldReset = !isOpen && location.pathname.endsWith("/hint"); +if (shouldReset) { - setHintStates({ - headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF", - // ... rest of the state reset - }); + setHintStates(initialHintState); setIsEdit(false); }frontend/src/tests/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx (1)
60-61: Heads up on the test selector change!Switching from
findByRoletofindByTestIdfor the settings form:
- ✅ More stable for testing
- ❌ Less accessible by moving away from ARIA roles
Consider keeping both for better test coverage:
- const settings = await screen.findByTestId("settings-form"); + const settings = await screen.findByTestId("settings-form"); + expect(settings).toHaveAttribute('role', 'form');frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupAppearance/PopupAppearance.jsx (1)
8-11: Clean up that spaghetti code with early return! 🍝The nested if condition can be simplified with an early return pattern.
- const handleActionChange = (newAction) => { - if (newAction) { - updatePopupStates("popupSize", newAction.toLowerCase()); - }; - }; + const handleActionChange = (newAction) => { + if (!newAction) return; + updatePopupStates("popupSize", newAction.toLowerCase()); + };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/src/tests/scenes/links/__snapshots__/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/DropdownList/DropdownList.jsx(0 hunks)frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.module.scss(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/products/LinkPreview/Preview.module.scss(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkAppearance.jsx(5 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkPage.module.scss(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/LinksDefaultPage.jsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.jsx(5 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupAppearance/PopupAppearance.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupContent/PopupContent.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideMainPageTemplate/GuideMainPageTemplate.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/tests/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx(5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/DropdownList/DropdownList.jsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- frontend/src/products/LinkPreview/Preview.module.scss
- frontend/src/components/Links/Settings/Settings.jsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- frontend/package.json
- frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplate.jsx
- frontend/src/templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext.jsx
- frontend/src/templates/DefaultPageTemplate/DefaultPageTemplate.jsx
- frontend/src/components/TextFieldComponents/CustomTextField/CustomTextField.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx
[error] 111-111: This property value named header is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.
Overwritten with this value.
If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named header
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
[error] 112-112: This property value named content is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.
Overwritten with this value.
If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named content
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupDefaultPage.jsx (2)
1-12: Yo, this state management is cleaner than mom's kitchen! 🍝
The switch from navigation to dialog-based state management is looking fresh! The hooks setup is clean and organized:
- Removed the messy navigation spaghetti
- Added proper dialog management
- Clean state variables for tracking updates and edits
33-50: This component structure is al dente perfection! 🍝
The component rendering is looking mighty fine:
- Clean fragment usage
- Props passed down like a well-oiled pasta machine
- Dialog integration smoother than marinara sauce
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinkAppearance.jsx (1)
31-32: Yo dawg, this default value addition is straight fire! 🔥
Adding || "" as a fallback is crucial to prevent the dreaded 'undefined' from showing up in your input. That's some defensive programming right there!
frontend/src/scenes/links/LinksDefaultPage.jsx (2)
32-34: Mom's spaghetti moment: Fragment wrapping looks clean!
The Fragment wrapping is on point! This prevents unnecessary DOM nesting while maintaining component structure.
Also applies to: 74-76
11-11: Yo! These hooks are fire, but let's double-check that cleanup!
The useDialog hook and itemsUpdated state are solid additions, but we might want to consider cleanup to prevent memory leaks.
Let's check if useDialog has any cleanup requirements:
Consider adding a cleanup effect:
+ useEffect(() => {
+ return () => {
+ setItemsUpdated(false);
+ };
+ }, []);Also applies to: 18-20
frontend/src/components/HintPageComponents/HintLeftContent/HintLeftContent.jsx (1)
43-46: Verify that URL handling is as smooth as fresh pasta! 🍝
Let's make sure the URL opening functionality is properly implemented in the parent components.
Also applies to: 75-79
frontend/src/scenes/hints/HintDefaultPage.jsx (4)
9-12: Yo! Your state management's looking clean! 🍝
The state variables and hooks are well-organized and follow React best practices.
14-24: Mom's spaghetti moment: Let's catch those errors! 🍝
The dialog handling functions need error handling to prevent unexpected states.
26-30: Clean function, just like mom's kitchen! 👨🍳
The getHintDetails function is pure and follows good practices.
32-49: Your component structure's looking fresh! 🔥
Clean component composition with well-organized props passing.
frontend/src/components/RichTextEditor/RichTextEditor.jsx (4)
Line range hint 31-52: Editor config's looking tight! 💪
Good job implementing cleanup in onDestroy and proper content management.
54-59: This useEffect's making my arms heavy! 💪
The condition for content updates could be simplified.
83-91: Those hardcoded styles making me nervous, yo! 😰
The EditorTabs component's absolute positioning needs to be more flexible.
96-103: Props validation's making my knees weak! 🤔
PropTypes need to be updated to mark essential props as required.
frontend/src/scenes/hints/CreateHintPage.jsx (1)
94-122:
This error handling's making me nervous, but on the surface I look calm and ready! 🎵
The error handling in the fetch operation needs improvement:
- No loading state to handle UI feedback
- No specific error cases handled
- No retry mechanism for transient failures
Add proper error handling:
+const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
+const [error, setError] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (isEdit) {
const fetchHintData = async () => {
+ setIsLoading(true);
+ setError(null);
try {
const hintData = await getHintById(itemId);
// ... state updates
} catch (error) {
+ const errorMessage = error.response?.status === 404
+ ? "Hint not found"
+ : "Failed to load hint data";
+ setError(errorMessage);
emitToastError(error);
+ } finally {
+ setIsLoading(false);
}
};
fetchHintData();
}
}, [isEdit, itemId]);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/tests/scenes/links/NewLinksPopup.test.jsx (2)
Line range hint 97-105: These form validations are straight fire! 🔥
The detailed input field validations are solid:
- ✅ Validates exact number of inputs
- ✅ Checks specific input names
- ✅ Ensures form structure integrity
9-9: Yo dawg, let's verify these provider changes!
The addition of GuideTemplateProvider and the new props structure needs validation:
- Is GuideTemplateProvider required for all test cases?
- Are the default values in currentHelper aligned with the production defaults?
Also applies to: 37-49
✅ Verification successful
Yo, these provider changes are legit! 🍝
The GuideTemplateProvider setup is consistent with the app's architecture:
- It's properly imported in the main index.jsx for app-wide context
- The test files using it (NewLinksPopup.test.jsx and CreatePopupPage.test.jsx) match the actual usage in LinksDefaultPage.jsx
- The currentHelper props in the test match the structure used in production code
The styling defaults in the test are just mock values for testing purposes, which is exactly what we want in a test environment.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if GuideTemplateProvider is consistently used across test files
rg -l "GuideTemplateProvider" "frontend/src/tests"
# Verify default values consistency
rg -A 5 "currentHelper.*=.*{" "frontend/src"
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix that regex and check for currentHelper usage
rg -A 5 "currentHelper\s*=\s*\{" "frontend/src"
# Check GuideTemplateProvider imports and usage patterns
rg -A 3 "import.*GuideTemplateProvider" "frontend/src"
# Look for GuideTemplate related context or defaults
ast-grep --pattern 'const currentHelper = $_'
Length of output: 2387
frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupAppearance/PopupAppearance.jsx (1)
6-6: Yo dawg, we need some prop validation up in here! 🍝
The component's accepting props but ain't got no PropTypes. Let's make it bulletproof!
Add prop validation:
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
const PopupAppearance = ({ data = [], popupSize, updatePopupStates }) => {
// ... component code ...
};
+PopupAppearance.propTypes = {
+ data: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({
+ stateName: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ state: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ setState: PropTypes.func.isRequired
+ })),
+ popupSize: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ updatePopupStates: PropTypes.func.isRequired
+};frontend/src/scenes/popup/PopupPageComponents/PopupContent/PopupContent.jsx (1)
6-11: Yo dawg, we need some prop validation here too! 🍝
Add PropTypes to validate the component's props.
+import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
const PopupContent = ({
actionButtonText,
buttonAction,
actionButtonUrl,
updatePopupStates,
}) => {
// ... component code ...
};
+PopupContent.propTypes = {
+ actionButtonText: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ buttonAction: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ actionButtonUrl: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ updatePopupStates: PropTypes.func.isRequired
+};frontend/src/scenes/popup/CreatePopupPage.jsx (2)
176-194: There's vomit on his sweater already: Reset all states after save! 🍝
The state reset logic should be extracted into a reusable function to avoid duplication.
+const initialState = {
+ header: "",
+ content: "",
+ activeButton: 0,
+ headerBackgroundColor: "#F8F9F8",
+ headerColor: "#101828",
+ textColor: "#344054",
+ buttonBackgroundColor: "#7F56D9",
+ buttonTextColor: "#FFFFFF",
+ actionButtonUrl: "https://",
+ actionButtonText: "Take me to subscription page",
+ buttonAction: "No action",
+ popupSize: "Small",
+};
+const resetState = () => {
+ setPopupStates(initialState);
+ setIsEdit(false);
+};
useEffect(() => {
if (!isOpen && location.pathname === "/popup") {
- setPopupStates({
- header: "",
- content: "",
- // ... other state resets
- });
- setIsEdit(false);
+ resetState();
}
}, [isOpen, location.pathname]);110-125:
Fix that duplicate spaghetti in the object keys! 🍝
The object has duplicate keys for 'header' and 'content' which will cause only the last values to be used.
const updatedStates = {
- header: popupData.header || "",
- content: popupData.content || "",
headerBackgroundColor: popupData.headerBackgroundColor || "#F8F9F8",
headerColor: popupData.headerColor || "#101828",
textColor: popupData.textColor || "#344054",
buttonBackgroundColor: popupData.buttonBackgroundColor || "#7F56D9",
buttonTextColor: popupData.buttonTextColor || "#FFFFFF",
header: popupData.header || "",
content: popupData.content || "",
actionButtonUrl: popupData.url || "https://",
actionButtonText: popupData.actionButtonText || "Take me to subscription page",
buttonAction: popupData.closeButtonAction || "No action",
popupSize: popupData.popupSize || "Small",
};Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 111-111: This property value named header is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.
Overwritten with this value.
If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named header
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
[error] 112-112: This property value named content is later overwritten by an object member with the same name.
Overwritten with this value.
If an object property with the same name is defined multiple times (except when combining a getter with a setter), only the last definition makes it into the object and previous definitions are ignored.
Unsafe fix: Remove this property value named content
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
| @@ -56,14 +57,14 @@ const LinkAppearance = () => { | |||
| Link font color{" "} | |||
| <div className={s.appearance__color}> | |||
| <span className={`${s.appearance__input} ${s.link}`}> | |||
| {helper.linkFontColor} | |||
| {helper.linkFontColor || "#344054"} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's vomit on his sweater: Inconsistent value display! 🤢
The link font color preview shows the default value ({helper.linkFontColor || "#344054"}), but the icon color preview doesn't have a default ({helper.iconColor}). Let's make this consistent!
Fix this inconsistency:
- {helper.iconColor}
+ {helper.iconColor || "#7F56D9"}Also applies to: 83-83
| @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ | |||
| height: 99.5vh; | |||
| right: 0; | |||
| top: 0; | |||
| z-index: 10000; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, that z-index is definitely out of control! 🍝
Looking at the z-index values across the codebase:
- Toast component: 9999
- Settings component: 10000
- Most other components: between 1-1000
This is like a rap battle where everyone's trying to outdo each other with higher numbers! We should bring this back down to earth.
Suggested fixes:
- Create a z-index scale variable system (like
--z-index-overlay: 100,--z-index-toast: 200,--z-index-settings: 300) - Settings panel should be just slightly higher than the toast (if it needs to be above it)
- Keep values under 1000 to maintain sanity
- z-index: 10000;
+ z-index: var(--z-index-settings, 300);🔗 Analysis chain
Yo! That z-index is higher than my anxiety levels! 🍝
The z-index value of 10000 is unnecessarily high and could lead to stacking context wars in the future. Consider using a more reasonable value and managing z-indices systematically.
Here's a more maintainable approach:
- z-index: 10000;
+ z-index: var(--z-index-settings, 100);Also, let's verify if this high z-index is really needed:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other z-index values in the codebase
rg -n "z-index:" --type css
Length of output: 739
| @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
| .product-page-container { | |||
| padding: 2% 3%; | |||
| width: 100%; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Yo dawg, we need that box-sizing: border-box to keep it tight!
After checking the codebase like mom's recipe book, I found that:
- The same
.product-page-containeris used in both GuideMainPageTemplate and ProductTour - Neither has
box-sizing: border-boxset - There's no global
box-sizingrule for these containers - ProductTour has a chunkier padding (3rem) compared to GuideMainPage (2% 3%)
Adding width: 100% without box-sizing: border-box is gonna make that container overflow like overcooked spaghetti! Here's what we need:
.product-page-container {
padding: 2% 3%;
width: 100%;
+ box-sizing: border-box;
}🔗 Analysis chain
Yo dawg, let's make sure this width doesn't cause any overflow issues!
Adding width: 100% with the existing padding could potentially cause horizontal scrolling. Consider adding box-sizing: border-box to ensure the padding is included within the width calculation, keeping everything tight like mom's spaghetti. 🍝
.product-page-container {
padding: 2% 3%;
width: 100%;
+ box-sizing: border-box;
}Let's check if this container appears in other templates that might be affected:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other uses of product-page-container class
rg "product-page-container" --type html --type jsx --type tsx
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the class usage
# First, let's find all potential frontend files
fd -e js -e jsx -e tsx -e html frontend/ | xargs rg "product-page-container"
# Also check the CSS file content to understand the context better
cat frontend/src/templates/GuideMainPageTemplate/GuideMainPageTemplate.css
# Let's also check for any other CSS files that might be related
fd -e css frontend/ | xargs rg "product-page"
Length of output: 3070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of ProductTourStyles.css to see if it has box-sizing
cat frontend/src/scenes/tours/ProductTourStyles.css
# Also check if there's any global box-sizing rule
fd -e css . | xargs rg "box-sizing"
Length of output: 1916
| @@ -10,13 +10,16 @@ import { emitToastError } from "../../utils/guideHelper"; | |||
| import toastEmitter, { TOAST_EMITTER_KEY } from "../../utils/toastEmitter"; | |||
| import LinkAppearance from "./LinkAppearance"; | |||
| import LinkContent from "./LinkContent"; | |||
| import { useDialog } from "../../templates/GuideTemplate/GuideTemplateContext"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, we need to update them PropTypes!
The new props setItemsUpdated and autoOpen are missing from the PropTypes definition at the bottom of the file. Let's not lose our spaghetti over this!
Add these bad boys to the PropTypes:
NewLinksPopup.propTypes = {
+ setItemsUpdated: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
+ autoOpen: PropTypes.bool,
currentHelper: PropTypes.shape({
// ... existing propsAlso applies to: 21-22
| const [hintStates, setHintStates] = useState({ | ||
| headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF", | ||
| headerColor: "#101828", | ||
| textColor: "#344054", | ||
| buttonBackgroundColor: "#7F56D9", | ||
| buttonTextColor: "#FFFFFF", | ||
| header: "", | ||
| content: "", | ||
| actionButtonUrl: "https://", | ||
| actionButtonText: "Take me to subscription page", | ||
| action: "No action", | ||
| targetElement: ".element", | ||
| tooltipPlacement: "Top", | ||
| activeButton: 0, | ||
| }); | ||
| const { | ||
| headerBackgroundColor, | ||
| headerColor, | ||
| textColor, | ||
| buttonBackgroundColor, | ||
| buttonTextColor, | ||
| header, | ||
| content, | ||
| actionButtonUrl, | ||
| actionButtonText, | ||
| action, | ||
| targetElement, | ||
| tooltipPlacement, | ||
| activeButton, | ||
| } = hintStates; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
These initial states are making me lose myself! 🎵
The initial state values are duplicated in the reset effect (lines 158-172). Let's extract them to avoid duplication:
+const initialHintState = {
+ headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF",
+ headerColor: "#101828",
+ textColor: "#344054",
+ buttonBackgroundColor: "#7F56D9",
+ buttonTextColor: "#FFFFFF",
+ header: "",
+ content: "",
+ actionButtonUrl: "https://",
+ actionButtonText: "Take me to subscription page",
+ action: "No action",
+ targetElement: ".element",
+ tooltipPlacement: "Top",
+ activeButton: 0,
+};
-const [hintStates, setHintStates] = useState({
- headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF",
- // ... rest of the initial state
-});
+const [hintStates, setHintStates] = useState(initialHintState);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [hintStates, setHintStates] = useState({ | |
| headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF", | |
| headerColor: "#101828", | |
| textColor: "#344054", | |
| buttonBackgroundColor: "#7F56D9", | |
| buttonTextColor: "#FFFFFF", | |
| header: "", | |
| content: "", | |
| actionButtonUrl: "https://", | |
| actionButtonText: "Take me to subscription page", | |
| action: "No action", | |
| targetElement: ".element", | |
| tooltipPlacement: "Top", | |
| activeButton: 0, | |
| }); | |
| const { | |
| headerBackgroundColor, | |
| headerColor, | |
| textColor, | |
| buttonBackgroundColor, | |
| buttonTextColor, | |
| header, | |
| content, | |
| actionButtonUrl, | |
| actionButtonText, | |
| action, | |
| targetElement, | |
| tooltipPlacement, | |
| activeButton, | |
| } = hintStates; | |
| const initialHintState = { | |
| headerBackgroundColor: "#FFFFFF", | |
| headerColor: "#101828", | |
| textColor: "#344054", | |
| buttonBackgroundColor: "#7F56D9", | |
| buttonTextColor: "#FFFFFF", | |
| header: "", | |
| content: "", | |
| actionButtonUrl: "https://", | |
| actionButtonText: "Take me to subscription page", | |
| action: "No action", | |
| targetElement: ".element", | |
| tooltipPlacement: "Top", | |
| activeButton: 0, | |
| }; | |
| const [hintStates, setHintStates] = useState(initialHintState); | |
| const { | |
| headerBackgroundColor, | |
| headerColor, | |
| textColor, | |
| buttonBackgroundColor, | |
| buttonTextColor, | |
| header, | |
| content, | |
| actionButtonUrl, | |
| actionButtonText, | |
| action, | |
| targetElement, | |
| tooltipPlacement, | |
| activeButton, | |
| } = hintStates; |
| const response = isEdit | ||
| ? await editHint(itemId, hintData) | ||
| : await addHint(hintData); | ||
| const toastMessage = location?.state?.isEdit ? "You edited this hint" : "New hint saved"; | ||
| const toastMessage = isEdit ? "You edited this hint" : "New hint saved"; | ||
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, toastMessage); | ||
| navigate("/hint"); | ||
| setItemsUpdated((prev) => !prev); | ||
| closeDialog(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This save operation's got me dropping bombs! 💣
The save operation needs validation and better error handling:
- No data validation before save
- No optimistic updates
- Generic error handling
Consider these improvements:
const onSave = async () => {
+ // Validate required fields
+ if (!header.trim() || !content.trim()) {
+ toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, "Header and content are required");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Optimistic update
+ setItemsUpdated((prev) => !prev);
+
try {
const response = isEdit
? await editHint(itemId, hintData)
: await addHint(hintData);
- setItemsUpdated((prev) => !prev);
closeDialog();
} catch (error) {
+ // Revert optimistic update
+ setItemsUpdated((prev) => !prev);
// ... error handling
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| screen.debug(); // Log the rendered DOM | ||
| expect(asFragment()).to.matchSnapshot(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti moment with these snapshots! 🍝
The debug logging in the snapshot test could cause issues:
- Debug output might contaminate snapshots
- Unnecessary console noise in test runs
Remove the debug call:
await waitFor(() => {
- screen.debug(); // Log the rendered DOM
expect(asFragment()).to.matchSnapshot();
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| screen.debug(); // Log the rendered DOM | |
| expect(asFragment()).to.matchSnapshot(); | |
| }); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(asFragment()).to.matchSnapshot(); | |
| }); |
| <CustomTextField | ||
| TextFieldWidth="241px" | ||
| value={actionButtonUrl} | ||
| onChange={handleActionButtonUrl} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mom's spaghetti: Add URL validation! 🍝
The actionButtonUrl input needs validation to ensure it's a valid URL.
+const isValidUrl = (url) => {
+ try {
+ new URL(url);
+ return true;
+ } catch {
+ return false;
+ }
+};
const handleActionButtonUrl = (event) => {
+ const url = event.target.value;
+ if (!url.startsWith('http://') && !url.startsWith('https://')) {
+ toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, 'URL must start with http:// or https://');
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!isValidUrl(url)) {
+ toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, 'Please enter a valid URL');
+ return;
+ }
updatePopupStates("actionButtonUrl", event.target.value);
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| try { | ||
| const response = isEdit | ||
| ? await editPopup(itemId, popupData) | ||
| : await addPopup(popupData); | ||
|
|
||
| const toastMessage = isEdit ? "You edited this popup" : "New popup Saved"; | ||
|
|
||
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, toastMessage); | ||
| setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState); | ||
| closeDialog(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message | ||
| ? `Error: ${error.response.data.message}` | ||
| : "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again."; | ||
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, errorMessage); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance that error handling spaghetti! 🍝
The error handling could be more robust with specific error types and better error messages.
try {
const response = isEdit
? await editPopup(itemId, popupData)
: await addPopup(popupData);
const toastMessage = isEdit ? "You edited this popup" : "New popup Saved";
toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, toastMessage);
setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState);
closeDialog();
} catch (error) {
- const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message
- ? `Error: ${error.response.data.message}`
- : "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.";
+ let errorMessage = "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.";
+ if (error.response?.status === 404) {
+ errorMessage = "Popup not found. It may have been deleted.";
+ } else if (error.response?.status === 403) {
+ errorMessage = "You don't have permission to perform this action.";
+ } else if (error.response?.data?.message) {
+ errorMessage = `Error: ${error.response.data.message}`;
+ }
toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, errorMessage);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| const response = isEdit | |
| ? await editPopup(itemId, popupData) | |
| : await addPopup(popupData); | |
| const toastMessage = isEdit ? "You edited this popup" : "New popup Saved"; | |
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, toastMessage); | |
| setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState); | |
| closeDialog(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message | |
| ? `Error: ${error.response.data.message}` | |
| : "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again."; | |
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, errorMessage); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = isEdit | |
| ? await editPopup(itemId, popupData) | |
| : await addPopup(popupData); | |
| const toastMessage = isEdit ? "You edited this popup" : "New popup Saved"; | |
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, toastMessage); | |
| setItemsUpdated((prevState) => !prevState); | |
| closeDialog(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| let errorMessage = "An unexpected error occurred. Please try again."; | |
| if (error.response?.status === 404) { | |
| errorMessage = "Popup not found. It may have been deleted."; | |
| } else if (error.response?.status === 403) { | |
| errorMessage = "You don't have permission to perform this action."; | |
| } else if (error.response?.data?.message) { | |
| errorMessage = `Error: ${error.response.data.message}`; | |
| } | |
| toastEmitter.emit(TOAST_EMITTER_KEY, errorMessage); | |
| } |
|
Created #401 with the merged changes |
