Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SRML-64 - fix: Focus ring offset #230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

SRML-64 - fix: Focus ring offset #230

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

jaieds
Copy link
Contributor

@jaieds jaieds commented Dec 26, 2024

Description

Screenshots

Types of changes

How has this been tested?

Checklist:

  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • I've created the npm build.
  • My code follows accessibility standards
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included any necessary tests
  • I've included developer documentation
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

@jaieds jaieds changed the title fix: Focus ring offset SRML-64 - fix: Focus ring offset Dec 27, 2024
ravindra114
ravindra114 approved these changes Dec 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ravindra114 ravindra114 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅

@jaieds jaieds changed the base branch from dev to staging December 30, 2024 08:39
@jaieds jaieds merged commit 9d8ed58 into staging Dec 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@jaieds jaieds deleted the uat-bugs/focus-ring branch December 30, 2024 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ravindra114 ravindra114 ravindra114 approved these changes

@vrundakansara vrundakansara Awaiting requested review from vrundakansara

@earth9890 earth9890 Awaiting requested review from earth9890

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jaieds @ravindra114