Adding support for Additional Hooks Paths #3124
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
We would like to provide the ability to place hooks in multiple locations, meaning there can be multiple hooks of the same type, and they can be provided under different circumstances. These additional hooks are comma separated list, and ordered as they are provided in terms of how multiple hooks are executed. Those in
hooks-path
are always first, and then sequentially throughadditional-hooks-paths
.There are 2 places where we pull in these hooks:
We don't currently support the
pre-bootstrap
hook with additional paths.Note
There is no change to any default behaviour included, nor is there any change in existing functionality when configuration is not changed. The only way to have any impact from this change is to set the new option with some value (which should be a comma separated list of paths).
A test is included here to validate the ordering of the hooks is predictable and preserved, however there is a weird timing issue during the test that prevents the additional hooks from being executed successfully. All manual usage of the changes has yielded expected results, so the test is left with
t.SkipNow()
to highlight that it should be possible to test this, and perhaps there's something I've overlooked here.Screenshots
Before any additional hook paths are defined:
Example trace showing additional hooks being run for a job:
Build output of the above within Buildkite
Changes
BUILDKITE_ADDITIONAL_HOOKS_PATHS
configuration optionhooks-path
agent-startup
hookTesting
go test ./...
). Buildkite employees may check this if the pipeline has run automatically.go fmt ./...
)t.SkipNow()
is used)