Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 7, 2024. It is now read-only.

chore(deps): update dependency jsonschema to >=4.22,<4.23 #77

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jsonschema (changelog) >=4.20,<4.21 -> >=4.22,<4.23 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

python-jsonschema/jsonschema (jsonschema)

v4.22.0

Compare Source

=======

  • Improve best_match (and thereby error messages from jsonschema.validate) in cases where there are multiple sibling errors from applying anyOf / allOf -- i.e. when multiple elements of a JSON array have errors, we now do prefer showing errors from earlier elements rather than simply showing an error for the full array (#​1250).
  • (Micro-)optimize equality checks when comparing for JSON Schema equality by first checking for object identity, as == would.

v4.21.1

Compare Source

=======

  • Slightly speed up the contains keyword by removing some unnecessary validator (re-)creation.

v4.21.0

Compare Source

=======

  • Fix the behavior of enum in the presence of 0 or 1 to properly consider True and False unequal (#​1208).
  • Special case the error message for {min,max}{Items,Length,Properties} when they're checking for emptiness rather than true length.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 30, 2024 21:07
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented May 3, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@canonical canonical deleted a comment from github-actions bot May 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Test coverage for 990e9fc

Name                        Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
src/charm.py                   64     11      8      3    78%   45-47, 97-98, 100-101, 121->exit, 129-130, 134-135
src/charm_state.py             97      5     16      3    91%   29, 216-218, 325
src/charm_types.py              8      0      0      0   100%
src/constants.py               10      0      0      0   100%
src/database_migration.py      47      0      6      0   100%
src/databases.py               51     11     15      1    79%   74-75, 131-133, 137-141, 149
src/exceptions.py               5      0      0      0   100%
src/flask_app.py               50      2     18      2    94%   69->71, 106-107
src/observability.py           22      0      0      0   100%
src/secret_storage.py          35      3      6      2    88%   45->exit, 74, 87-88
src/webserver.py               65      4     12      1    94%   132, 138-144
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                         454     36     81     12    90%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2024-05-10 18:14:42.614104

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 1040
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 1
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants