Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DPE-5216] S3 integration #98

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

[DPE-5216] S3 integration #98

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

Batalex
Copy link
Contributor

@Batalex Batalex commented Aug 29, 2024

@Batalex Batalex self-assigned this Aug 29, 2024
@Batalex Batalex marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2024 09:38
Copy link
Contributor

@deusebio deusebio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, looks good! I don't have any major concern, so I'm going to approve.

I would have only one major important comment to be discussed: in Spark, we already have a s3 manager for doing similar things as done here (e.g. verifications). Why not having a similar API code or understand the differences such that we can see whether it would be possible to have a single implementation (for now, still copy and pasted in two different charms, but that is consistent one another - given we have a similar pattern and abstraction).

Also in Spark we do some tls-ca verifications. Would it be worth having it here too?

actions.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/models.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/events/backup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/managers/backup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/managers/backup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Batalex Batalex merged commit 3aa8820 into main Sep 3, 2024
13 checks passed
@Batalex Batalex deleted the feat/dpe-5216-s3-integration branch September 3, 2024 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants