Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor editor structure #13

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cp-megh-l
Copy link
Collaborator

@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l commented Feb 2, 2024

Changelog

  • Refactor editor structure to quill structure
  • Support bullet list
  • And unit tests for testcase scenarios
  • Add test in workflow

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced comprehensive text styling and management for the Quill editor, including support for bold, italic, underline, bullet lists, and headers.
    • Added functionality for encoding and decoding editor content to and from JSON format.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced text span management with new data classes and an enum for list types.
    • Updated and improved styling capabilities, including conditional bullet styling and corrected header mappings.
  • Refactor
    • Renamed various entities to align with the Quill editor naming convention.
  • Tests
    • Added new test cases for text styling and management functionalities.
    • Implemented a test rule for managing the main coroutine dispatcher.
  • Chores
    • Updated dependencies and Gradle configuration to improve build process and compatibility.
  • Documentation
    • Adjusted in-code documentation to reflect new functionalities and naming conventions.

@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l marked this pull request as draft February 2, 2024 05:44
@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l force-pushed the refactor-editor-structure branch 2 times, most recently from fefce9d to 527bd7e Compare February 13, 2024 12:18
@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l force-pushed the refactor-editor-structure branch from 3aebfac to 557a0d7 Compare February 26, 2024 06:54
@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l force-pushed the refactor-editor-structure branch from ab102d5 to 2e61f6f Compare March 5, 2024 10:26
@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l requested a review from cp-radhika-s March 5, 2024 10:43
@cp-megh-l cp-megh-l marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2024 10:43
@cp-radhika-s
Copy link
Member

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The update encompasses significant enhancements to Quill editor integration, focusing on text styling and serialization. It establishes a robust framework for managing editor states, styling text with various attributes, and encoding/decoding content in JSON format. The update also improves testing infrastructure and updates dependencies for a more reliable and up-to-date development environment.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../QuillEditorState.kt, .../QuillTextManager.kt, .../QuillSpan.kt, .../QuillTextSpan.kt, .../QuillEditorAdapter.kt, .../RichEditor.kt, .../ElementsSpanStyle.kt, .../QuillJsonEditorParser.kt, .../QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt, MainActivity.kt, .../parser/QuillJsonEditorParser.kt, .../parser/QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt Introduced and enhanced classes for managing Quill editor states, text styling, and JSON serialization/deserialization. Renamed entities for consistency.
.../MainCoroutineRule.kt, .../quilltextmanager/QuillTextManagerTest.kt Added new classes for coroutine testing and QuillTextManager testing.
.github/workflows/app-build.yml, build.gradle, editor/build.gradle, gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties Updated build scripts, dependencies, and Gradle version for an improved build process and testing.

"In a world of code and pixel,
Where text and style intermix,
A rabbit hopped, with tricks so slick,
🎩✨ Upgrading editors, with clicks and flicks.
With every leap, a bug fixed,
In JSON lands, where spans and styles affixed.
Cheers to changes, bold and nixed!"
🐰💻🔄

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b426344 and e85286d.
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • app/src/main/assets/android-quill-sample.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • app/src/main/assets/sample-data.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
  • app/src/main/res/drawable/baseline_format_list_bulleted_24.xml is excluded by: !**/*.xml
  • editor/src/test/assets/android-quill-sample.json is excluded by: !**/*.json
Files selected for processing (18)
  • .github/workflows/app-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/MainActivity.kt (6 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/parser/QuillJsonEditorParser.kt (1 hunks)
  • app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/parser/QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt (1 hunks)
  • build.gradle (1 hunks)
  • editor/build.gradle (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillEditorState.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillTextManager.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/model/QuillSpan.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/model/QuillTextSpan.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/parser/QuillEditorAdapter.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/ui/RichEditor.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/utils/ElementsSpanStyle.kt (4 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/MainCoroutineRule.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/QuillJsonEditorParser.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/quilltextmanager/QuillTextManagerTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 54
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/model/QuillTextSpan.kt (1)
  • 5-8: The change from a single TextSpanStyle to a list of TextSpanStyle objects in QuillTextSpan is a significant improvement for flexibility in styling. However, ensure that all usages of QuillTextSpan throughout the codebase have been updated to work with a list of styles instead of a single style object. This change might require updates in the logic where QuillTextSpan instances are created or manipulated.
Verification successful

The provided context from the shell scripts confirms that the codebase has been updated to accommodate the change from a single TextSpanStyle to a list of TextSpanStyle objects in QuillTextSpan. This includes updates in test cases and the main codebase, where QuillTextSpan instances are created and manipulated to work with a list of styles. Therefore, the initial review comment has been addressed properly.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of QuillTextSpan to ensure they handle a list of styles.
rg --type kotlin "QuillTextSpan" --context 5

Length of output: 25875

gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties (1)
  • 4-4: Upgrading the Gradle version to 8.2 is a good practice to stay up-to-date with the latest features and improvements. Ensure that this upgrade does not introduce any compatibility issues with the project's plugins and dependencies. It's recommended to perform a full build and run all tests to verify that everything works as expected after the upgrade.
.github/workflows/app-build.yml (1)
  • 16-17: Adding a step to run tests in the GitHub Actions workflow is a crucial improvement for ensuring code quality and catching regressions early. This aligns with the PR's objective to incorporate unit tests into the workflow. Make sure that the test suite is comprehensive and covers the new functionalities introduced by the refactor.
build.gradle (1)
  • 3-4: Updating the com.android.application and com.android.library plugins to version 8.2.2 is a positive step towards leveraging the latest features and bug fixes. Similar to the Gradle version upgrade, ensure compatibility with the project's configuration and dependencies. A full build and test run should be performed to confirm that there are no issues arising from this update.
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/model/QuillSpan.kt (1)
  • 1-22: The introduction of QuillSpan, Span, Attributes, and ListType data classes is a significant step towards implementing the Quill editor's structure. This change allows for a more flexible and extensible way to represent and manipulate editor content. Ensure that the rest of the editor's codebase is updated to utilize these new data structures where applicable. Additionally, consider adding documentation to these data classes to explain their roles and how they interact with each other, enhancing maintainability and readability.
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/parser/QuillEditorAdapter.kt (1)
  • 5-17: Introducing the QuillEditorAdapter interface and its default implementation QuillDefaultAdapter is a good practice for abstracting the encoding and decoding logic of the editor's content. This design allows for easy extension or replacement of the encoding/decoding strategy in the future. However, the current implementation of QuillDefaultAdapter returns an empty QuillSpan and converts QuillSpan to a string by calling toString() on its spans property. Ensure that these are placeholder implementations and plan to implement or extend these methods to handle the editor's content appropriately.

Consider implementing the encoding and decoding logic based on the Quill editor's specifications to fully support the editor's functionalities.

app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/parser/QuillJsonEditorParser.kt (1)
  • 10-22: Implementing QuillJsonEditorParser as an adapter for JSON parsing of editor content is a valuable addition, facilitating the serialization and deserialization of QuillSpan objects. Using Gson for this purpose is a solid choice due to its flexibility and ease of use. Ensure that the custom type adapter QuillRichTextStateAdapter (registered in line 13) is correctly implemented to handle the serialization and deserialization of Span objects, including their attributes. This is crucial for accurately representing the editor's content in JSON format.
editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/MainCoroutineRule.kt (1)
  • 12-25: Introducing MainCoroutineRule is an excellent practice for testing coroutines by setting the main dispatcher to a test dispatcher. This allows tests to run synchronously and control coroutine execution, making tests more predictable and reliable. Ensure that this rule is applied in all coroutine-based tests within the project to maintain consistency and improve test reliability.
editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt (1)
  • 14-42: Implementing QuillRichTextStateAdapter as a custom Gson type adapter for Span objects is crucial for handling the serialization and deserialization of editor content accurately. This implementation allows for custom handling of Span attributes, which is essential for representing the editor's content in JSON format correctly. Ensure that all possible attributes of Span objects are correctly handled in both serialization and deserialization processes. Additionally, consider adding more error handling and validation to the deserialize method to gracefully handle malformed JSON input.
app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/parser/QuillRichTextStateAdapter.kt (3)
  • 15-25: The serialize method correctly serializes a Span object into a JSON object. It's good practice to check for nullability of src and context before proceeding with serialization to avoid potential NullPointerExceptions.

Consider adding null checks or requireNonNull calls for src and context at the beginning of the method to ensure they are not null.

  • 27-43: In the deserialize method, the exception handling is broad, catching all Exception types. While this ensures that any runtime issues are caught and logged, it might obscure the root cause of some errors, such as ClassCastException or IllegalStateException.

Narrow down the exception handling to catch more specific exceptions related to JSON parsing, such as JsonParseException or IllegalStateException. This approach helps in identifying the exact issue during deserialization.

  • 41-42: Logging the exception in deserialize method is a good practice for debugging. However, re-throwing a generic JsonParseException with a fixed message "Invalid JSON" might not provide enough context about the error.

Consider including more details in the exception message, such as a part of the invalid JSON or a more specific error message based on the caught exception, to aid in debugging.

editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/ui/RichEditor.kt (2)
  • 17-21: The renaming of RichEditorState to QuillEditorState in the RichEditor function signature aligns with the PR's objective to refactor the editor's structure to match the Quill editor's architecture. This change is correctly reflected in the function parameter.
  • 14-24: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [21-88]

The RichEditor composable function correctly sets up an EditText for rich text editing, leveraging the QuillEditorState for managing the editor's state. The use of AndroidView to integrate the traditional Android EditText within Jetpack Compose is appropriate here, given the need for detailed text manipulation not yet fully supported by Compose's TextField.

However, consider adding comments explaining the rationale behind choosing EditText over Compose's TextField for future maintainers.

editor/build.gradle (3)
  • 71-73: Updating the versions of com.google.android.material:material and androidx.activity:activity-compose is a good practice to keep the project up-to-date with the latest libraries. Ensure that these version updates are tested thoroughly to avoid any compatibility issues with existing code.
  • 94-98: The addition of testing dependencies, including mockito-kotlin, kotlinx-coroutines-test, and mockito-inline, is essential for the PR's objective to add unit tests for various testcase scenarios. These libraries are well-suited for mocking and testing coroutines in Kotlin.

Ensure that the added dependencies are used effectively in the unit tests to mock dependencies and test asynchronous code.

  • 98-98: Adding com.google.code.gson:gson:2.10.1 as a dependency is necessary for JSON serialization and deserialization, aligning with the PR's changes that involve handling JSON data for the editor's state management.
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/utils/ElementsSpanStyle.kt (3)
  • 69-84: The introduction of BulletStyle with conditional creation of BulletSpan based on Build.VERSION.SDK_INT is a thoughtful approach to ensure compatibility with different Android versions. This allows for bullet list styling with custom indentation and color on newer Android versions while maintaining backward compatibility.
  • 102-102: Correcting the key for H2Style from "h3" to "h2" is a necessary fix to ensure that header styles are correctly applied and match their intended levels. This correction improves the consistency and accuracy of text styling within the editor.
  • 165-174: The addition of HeaderMap with mappings for header styles is a good practice for managing different header levels in a centralized manner. This makes it easier to apply the correct style based on the header level and enhances the maintainability of the code.
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillEditorState.kt (2)
  • 14-135: The QuillEditorState class is well-structured and provides a clear interface for managing the editor's state, including methods for toggling styles, updating styles, and resetting the editor. The use of a builder pattern for instantiation is appropriate for setting up the state with customizable options.

Consider adding more detailed documentation for public methods to improve code readability and maintainability.

  • 47-117: The logic for grouping spans and merging consecutive spans with the same attributes in getRichText method is complex but necessary for efficiently managing the editor's content. This approach helps in minimizing the number of spans and optimizing the editor's performance.

However, the method is quite lengthy and involves multiple nested operations. Consider refactoring it into smaller, more manageable functions to improve readability and maintainability.

app/src/main/java/com/example/texteditor/MainActivity.kt (3)
  • 42-45: Renaming RichEditorState to QuillEditorState and JsonEditorParser to QuillJsonEditorParser in the imports section correctly reflects the changes made in the PR to align with the Quill editor's architecture. This ensures consistency across the project.
  • 69-74: The setup of QuillEditorState using the builder pattern and initializing it with content from a JSON file demonstrates a practical use case for the editor's state management. The use of QuillJsonEditorParser for parsing the JSON content is appropriate and aligns with the PR's objectives.
  • 123-134: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [80-131]

The StyleContainer composable function demonstrates how to use QuillEditorState to toggle and update text styles within the editor. The inclusion of a button for bullet lists (BulletStyle) is a direct implementation of the PR's objective to introduce support for bullet lists.

editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/quilltextmanager/QuillTextManagerTest.kt (24)
  • 3-40: The setup method correctly initializes the QuillEditorState and other necessary instances for testing. However, consider adding a teardown method to clean up or reset the state after each test to ensure test isolation and prevent potential side effects between tests.
  • 43-47: The test test getQuillSpan correctly asserts the non-nullability of the quillSpan. It's a straightforward test ensuring the basic functionality works as expected.
  • 49-52: The test test output correctly asserts the non-nullability of the output from quillEditorState.output(). This test ensures that the editor state can produce an output, but it might be beneficial to also verify the correctness of the output against expected values.
  • 55-58: The test test reset correctly asserts that the quillTextSpans list is empty after calling reset. This ensures that the reset functionality works as intended.
  • 61-64: The test test hasStyle correctly asserts that the initial state does not have the BoldStyle. It's a good practice to also test the positive case where a style is present.
  • 67-71: The test test toggleStyle correctly toggles a style and asserts its presence. This test effectively covers both adding and checking for a style.
  • 74-78: The test test updateStyle seems to duplicate the functionality tested in test toggleStyle. Consider clarifying the difference between toggleStyle and updateStyle in the test names or comments if they are intended to test different aspects.
  • 81-86: The test scenario 1 - test span added successfully when text is selected and style is added correctly asserts that a new span is added when a style is applied. This test effectively checks the functionality of adding styles to selected text.
  • 89-100: The test scenario 2 - test span removed successfully when text is selected and style is removed correctly asserts that a span is removed when a style is toggled off. This test effectively checks the functionality of removing styles from selected text.
  • 103-109: The test scenario 3 - test span created successfully when user selects style and starts typing correctly asserts that a new span is created when a style is selected and the user starts typing. This test effectively checks the dynamic addition of styles while typing.
  • 112-126: The test scenario 4 - test other span created successfully when user deselects style and starts typing effectively checks the addition of a new span when a style is toggled off and the user continues typing. However, the comment "// Verify 2 new spans added compared to android-quill-sample.json as original has 3 spans" could be misleading if the initial state or the sample JSON changes. Consider making the test more self-contained by not relying on external state assumptions.
  • 130-143: The test scenario 5 - extend current span if user starts typing in middle of the word which have style on it effectively checks that the span is extended when typing in the middle of a styled word. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles inline text modifications.
  • 147-157: The test scenario 6 - extend current span if user starts typing just after styles text effectively checks that the span is extended when typing just after a styled word. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles text additions immediately following styled text.
  • 161-171: The test scenario 7 - test span is moved by typed character if user starts typing just before styles text effectively checks that the span is moved forward when typing just before a styled word. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles text additions immediately before styled text.
  • 175-181: The test scenario 8 - add span with selected style if user starts typing at initial position effectively checks that a new span with the selected style is added when the user starts typing at the initial position. This test ensures that the editor correctly applies styles from the beginning of the text.
  • 185-189: The test scenario 9 - break spans into 2 when user removes style from middle of word by selection text effectively checks that spans are correctly split into two when a style is removed from the middle of a word. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles style removal in complex scenarios.
  • 193-200: The test scenario 10 - break spans into 2 when user deselects style and starts typing in middle of any word which have style effectively checks that spans are split when a style is deselected and the user starts typing in the middle of a styled word. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles dynamic style changes during text modification.
  • 204-214: The test scenario 11 - update span length when any character is removed from it effectively checks that the span length is updated when characters are removed from it. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles character deletions within styled spans.
  • 218-228: The test scenario 12 - Move span by n position forward when user adds n character before styled text anywhere before that text effectively checks that spans are moved forward when characters are added before styled text. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles text additions that affect the position of styled spans.
  • 232-243: The test scenario 13 - Move span by n position backward when user removes n character before styled text anywhere before that text effectively checks that spans are moved backward when characters are removed before styled text. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles text deletions that affect the position of styled spans.
  • 247-257: The test scenario 14 - remove header style when user add new line effectively checks that the header style is removed when a new line is added. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles style removal in response to structural text changes.
  • 261-268: The test scenario 15 - merge spans if style applied to selected text is equivalent to previous and next span effectively checks that spans are merged when the applied style matches adjacent spans. This test ensures that the editor optimizes span storage by merging compatible spans.
  • 272-285: The test scenario 16 - if new line is entered in between text then remove header if available and split span into two effectively checks that spans are split and styles are correctly adjusted when a new line is entered within styled text. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles structural changes within styled spans.
  • 289-294: The test scenario 17 - test remove all styles if selection range is 0,0 effectively checks that all styles are removed when the selection range is at the initial position. This test ensures that the editor correctly handles style removal in a specific scenario.
editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillTextManager.kt (5)
  • 18-52: The constructor and initialization block effectively parse and set up the initial state based on the provided QuillSpan. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
  • The calculation of startIndex and fromIndex could potentially lead to incorrect indices if the same substring appears multiple times in the editableText. Consider ensuring uniqueness in the text spans or adopting a more robust indexing mechanism.
  • The handling of attributes and the creation of textSpanStyles is clear and modular. However, consider extracting this logic into a separate method to improve readability and maintainability.

Consider refactoring the initialization logic to ensure robust indexing and improve code clarity by extracting the style processing into a separate method.

  • 67-86: The updateText method demonstrates a good practice of removing existing spans before applying new ones. However, catching a generic Exception and printing its stack trace (e.printStackTrace()) is not the best practice for error handling in production code. It would be more beneficial to handle specific exceptions or use a logging framework to log the error appropriately.

Consider handling specific exceptions that might occur during span application and use a logging framework for error reporting instead of printStackTrace.

  • 134-235: The methods toggleStyle, removeStyle, and addStyle are central to the functionality of QuillTextManager, allowing dynamic style changes to the text. These methods are well-structured but have some areas that could be improved:
  • The handling of bullet styles and header styles is somewhat repetitive and could be abstracted into helper methods.
  • The direct manipulation of editable and currentStyles within these methods makes them somewhat hard to follow. Consider encapsulating some of this logic into more focused methods or classes.
  • The use of magic strings (e.g., "\u200B") and magic numbers (e.g., index calculations) could be replaced with well-named constants to improve code readability.

Refactor these methods to reduce repetition and improve clarity. Introduce helper methods for common tasks and replace magic strings and numbers with constants.

  • 358-364: The method onTextFieldValueChange correctly updates the internal state based on text field changes. However, it directly manipulates rawText and calls updateText without considering potential performance implications of frequent updates. For large texts or rapid input, this could lead to performance issues.

Consider debouncing or throttling updates to mitigate potential performance issues with large texts or rapid input.

  • 656-661: The generic removeSpans extension function for Editable is a clean and reusable way to remove all spans of a specific type. This is a good practice and enhances code readability and maintainability.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e85286d and 91c4849.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillTextManager.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/RichTextStateAdapter.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/TestEditorParser.kt (1 hunks)
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/quilltextmanager/QuillTextManagerTest.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • editor/src/main/java/com/canopas/editor/ui/data/QuillTextManager.kt
  • editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/quilltextmanager/QuillTextManagerTest.kt
Additional comments: 5
editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/TestEditorParser.kt (3)
  • 3-8: The import statement for com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken is used for generic type token creation in Gson deserialization. Ensure that the Gson library version used in the project supports this feature adequately, as it's crucial for the correct deserialization of QuillSpan objects.
  • 12-14: The Gson instance is configured with a custom type adapter RichTextStateAdapter for the Span class. This is a good practice for handling complex serialization and deserialization logic. However, ensure that RichTextStateAdapter is correctly implemented to handle all cases of Span objects, especially since Span might have been refactored or its properties changed as part of the editor's overhaul.
  • 16-22: The encode and decode methods correctly implement the QuillEditorAdapter interface, providing serialization and deserialization functionality for QuillSpan objects. It's important to ensure that all properties of QuillSpan are correctly handled by the Gson configuration, especially if QuillSpan has custom attributes or complex nested structures.
editor/src/test/java/com/canopas/editor/jsonparser/RichTextStateAdapter.kt (2)
  • 14-24: The serialize method correctly converts a Span object into a JsonObject. It's important to ensure that all relevant properties of Span are included in the serialization process. If Span has been modified or extended as part of the editor overhaul, additional properties might need to be serialized.
  • 26-42: The deserialize method attempts to convert a JsonObject back into a Span object. The use of a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions is a good practice. However, it's crucial to ensure that the deserialization process correctly handles all properties of Span, especially if new attributes have been introduced or existing ones modified. Additionally, consider logging the exception before throwing JsonParseException to aid in debugging potential issues.

Consider adding logging for exceptions in the deserialize method to improve debuggability.

@canopas canopas deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants