Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: MET-1673 Staking Delegation Lifecycle - Rewards Distributions C… #2123

Conversation

Sotatek-TungPham
Copy link
Collaborator

…F - 194

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and a brief description about this PR

Checklist before requesting a review

Issue ticket number and link

  • This PR has a valid ticket number or issue: [link]

Testing & Validation

  • This PR has been tested/validated in Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Brave browsers.
  • The code has been tested locally with test coverage match expectations.
  • Added new Unit/Component testing (if relevant).

Security

  • No secrets are being committed (i.e. credentials, PII)
  • This PR does not have any significant security implications

Code Review

  • There is no unused functionality or blocks of commented out code (otherwise, please explain below)
  • In addition to this PR, all relevant documentation (e.g. Confluence / README.md file) and architecture diagrams (e.g. Miro) were updated

Design Review

  • If this PR contains changes to the UI, it has gone through a design review with UX Designer or Product owner.
  • In case PR contains changes to the UI, add some screenshots to notice the differences

Chrome

Before
After

Safari

Before
After

Responsive

Before
After

@Sotatek-TungPham Sotatek-TungPham added the dev-test This label is for sota test purpose label Oct 4, 2023
@Sotatek-TrungHoang Sotatek-TrungHoang merged commit f9dc130 into sota_testing Oct 4, 2023
2 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev-test This label is for sota test purpose
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants