-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update build process, adapt wasm and keychain CI #717
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
381f62c
to
86f1b2c
Compare
86f1b2c
to
d9cfbe7
Compare
branches: [main] | ||
jobs: | ||
test: | ||
if: always() == 'skip' # temporarily skip cc @jun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes 🙏
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
turbo.json
Outdated
"build-wasm": { | ||
"outputs": ["packages/account-wasm/pkg/**"] | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's prob simpler to rename the script to build:deps in packages/account-wasm/package.json
so pnpm turbo build:deps
handles the all lib build
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we probably don't want to build wasm everywhere though as it has more deps and requires more resources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah I see, I guess that's why pkg
is committed. Makes sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one thing about pnpm vm, otherwise it's working fine locally!
.tool-versions
Outdated
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | |||
scarb 2.7.0 | |||
starknet-foundry 0.18.0 | |||
nodejs v20.11.1 | |||
pnpm 9.7.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pnpm version should be managed by corepack
# once Node.js is installed via asdf or whatever vm,
corepack enable pnpm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we have it here anyway? I am using asdf for pnpm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer to avoid duplication of versioning
Line 3 in 1bc2065
"packageManager": "[email protected]", |
No description provided.